BUSINESS & POLITICS IN THE WORLD

 

GLOBAL OPINION REPORT NO. 707

 

 

Week: September 06 –September 12, 2021

 

Presentation: September 17, 2021

 

 

Contents

 

707-43-22/Commentary: Twenty Years On, 80% Of Britons Still Remember Where They Were On 9/11. 2

SUMMARY OF POLLS. 5

ASIA   12

Indian Consumers, Reveals A Spending Propensity Of 90.71 Among Urban Indians This Festive Season. 12

Three In Ten Urban Indians Have Changed Their Primary Bank In The Past 13

AFRICA.. 16

More Than Three-Fourths (77%) Of Guineans Prefer Democracy To Any Other Form Of Government 16

More Than One In Four Gambian Citizens (28%) Say They Or A Member Of Their Family Suffered Human-Rights Abuses Under Jammeh’s Regime. 22

A Majority (58%) Of Tanzanians Say They Have Heard Of Social Media. 25

Seven In Every Ten (71%) South Africans Have Indicated That They Would Vote In The Coming Local Government Elections. 29

WEST EUROPE.. 32

7 In 10 Parents Worried About Their Children Catching Covid-19 When They Return To School 32

Just One In Five Members Of The Public Have A Positive View Of The Foreign Secretary. 34

41% Of Britons Said Brexit Is The Main Reason For Reported Shortage Of Drivers And Supply Chain Issues. 35

More Than Two In Five Think Christmas Will Be Free Of Pandemic Restrictions. 36

Twenty Years On, 80% Of Britons Still Remember Where They Were On 9/11. 38

55% Of Arsenal Supporters Interviewed With Yougov Direct Said They Were Confident In The Team... 41

4 In 10 Britons Think Country Heading In Wrong Direction But Johnson Much More Popular Than Starmer Among Their Own Voters. 44

Most Britons 57% Want To Ban Cigarettes – And Half Want To Ban Vaping Products. 47

NORTH AMERICA.. 48

Ahead Of The COVID-19 Recession The Unemployment Rate Was Below 4%... 48

62% Of Adults With A Disability Say They Own A Desktop Or Laptop Computer 54

46% Of Canadians Who Say They Are Going To Support A Party On Election Day Are Absolutely Certain Of Their Vote Choice. 56

One In Eight (13%) Canadians Is Completely Undecided On How To Vote. 59

AUSTRALIA.. 60

The Australian Economy Grew By A Stunning 9.6% Over The Year To June 2021. 60

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES. 62

4 Out Of 10 Brazilians Want To Go Back To Working Outside The Home At The End Of The Pandemic. 62

Most Adults Vaccinated Against Covid-19 In All 13 Countries Surveyed Intend To Get A Booster Shot 64

 


 

INTRODUCTORY NOTE

 

This weekly report consists of twenty one surveys. The report includes two multi-country studies from different states across the globe.

 

707-43-22/Commentary: Twenty Years On, 80% Of Britons Still Remember Where They Were On 9/11

Two decades have passed since terrorists brought down the Twin Towers in hijacked planes in an unprecedented attack on the US, killing nearly 3,000 people. A new YouGov survey now shows that 80% of Britons can still remember where they were when they heard the news of the incident. Only one in ten people (10%) can’t remember their whereabouts when hearing the news, while another 8% were too young or not yet born.

Britons aged 50 to 64 are the most likely to remember the day, with 93% saying it’s still fresh in their memory. Among 18-24-year-olds, 7% remember where they were when they first heard about the attacks, despite the oldest people in this group having been only four years old at the time.

Fewer Britons believe 9/11 changed the world completely than ten years ago

While a large share of the public are convinced that the world was not the same after 9/11, this number of those believing it became radically different has fallen over time. Two fifths of Britons (42%) say the terrorist incident “changed the world completely” – down from 53% a decade ago. Another 45% believe it changed it “a little”, which is slightly higher than in 2011, at 38%.

Only one in twelve people either say it did not change very much (6%) or not at all (2%), which is similar to previously (5% not very much, 2% not at all).

Three in five Britons (59%) likewise say that the 11 September attacks have had a larger impact on the world than the 2007-08 global financial crisis, a similar figure to the number who said so in 2018 (54%) on the 10th anniversary of the crisis. Around three in ten people (30%) currently believe the financial crisis – which until the coronavirus pandemic had been the worst recession since the 1920s – had a greater impact (from 32% in 2018).

Conservative voters are slightly more likely than Labour members to say the 9/11 attacks had a larger impact on the world at 65% vs 54%.

But while many people still vividly remember hearing about the attacks, and several terror incidents having happened in the UK since, few Britons fear for their safety in this context.

Some 8% of the public believe there’s a ‘very’ (1%) or ‘fairly’ (7%) high chance they or someone close to them would become injured or killed in a terrorist attack. This is similar to both in 2011 (1% very high, 6% fairly high) and 2006 (2% very high, 6% fairly high).

While the proportion of people who feel the odds are high remains the same, fewer people now say the possibility is ‘almost non-existent’ or ‘very low’ than previously.

In 2006 and 2011, one in four Britons (25%) believed there was virtually no chance they or a loved one could become a victim of terrorism, while another 29-30% felt the chance was very low.

Today, only a fifth (18%) regard the possibility as near non-existent, while a quarter (24%) see it as very low. Instead the most common answer is ‘fairly low’ at 36% - 5-6 points higher than in 2011 and 2006.

(YouGov UK)

September 09, 2021

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2021/09/09/twenty-years-80-britons-still-remember-where-they-

707-43-23/Country Profile:

UK2UK3

SUMMARY OF POLLS

ASIA

(India)

Indian Consumers, Reveals A Spending Propensity Of 90.71 Among Urban Indians This Festive Season

YouGov’s Diwali Spending Index, an indicator of the spending intent among Indian consumers, reveals a spending propensity of 90.71 among urban Indians this festive season. Even though it is below average (of 100), the intent to spend is higher than last time (80.96), indicating a recovering appetite to spend among urban Indians.

(YouGov India)

September 7, 2021

 

Three In Ten Urban Indians Have Changed Their Primary Bank In The Past

YouGov’s latest survey reveals close to a third (31%) of urban Indians claim to have changed their primary bank in the past five years or more. Among different generations, millennials appear to be the most visible switchers and are much more likely than Gen X to have changed their primary bank in the past (41% vs 23%). Among the genders, men as compared to women are more likely to switch in the future (58% vs 50%).

(YouGov India)

September 9, 2021

 

AFRICA

(Guinea)

More Than Three-Fourths (77%) Of Guineans Prefer Democracy To Any Other Form Of Government

Dissatisfaction with the country’s economic conditions and citizens’ personal living conditions has increased, as have negative ratings of the government’s economic performance and provision of essential public services. Only three in 10 citizens are satisfied with the way their democracy is working. But the study also shows that most Guineans endorse elections as the best way to choose leaders and that citizens’ preference for democracy has remained consistently high over the years.

(Afrobarometer)

6 September 2021

(Gambia)

More Than One In Four Gambian Citizens (28%) Say They Or A Member Of Their Family Suffered Human-Rights Abuses Under Jammeh’s Regime

Almost three-fourths (73%) of Gambians say perpetrators of crimes and human-rights abuses during Jammeh’s regime should be tried in court, a 5-percentage-point increase compared to 2018. More than one in four citizens (28%) say they or a member of their family suffered human-rights abuses under Jammeh’s regime. Citizens expect the TRRC’s work to lead to a variety of outcomes, including national peace, reconciliation, forgiveness, and healing (34%).

(Afrobarometer)

6 September 2021

(Tanzania)

A Majority (58%) Of Tanzanians Say They Have Heard Of Social Media

One in five Tanzanians say they get news from social media every day (13%) or “a few times a week) (7%). In total, 27% of citizens say they use social media for news at least on occasion, a 9-percentage-point increase compared to 2017. A majority (58%) of Tanzanians say they have heard of social media. Awareness of social media is higher among men and urbanites than among women and rural residents, and increases strongly with respondents’ education level, ranging from 20% of those with no formal education to 96% of those with post-secondary qualifications.

(Afrobarometer)

8 September 2021

 

(South Africa)

Seven In Every Ten (71%) South Africans Have Indicated That They Would Vote In The Coming Local Government Elections

Countrywide almost half (49.3%) will draw a cross next to the name of the ANC, while the support for both the DA (17.9%) and the EFF (14.5%) respectively, is also in double figures. South Africa has a plethora of registered political parties, but very few of them currently garner more than one percent of support. 

(Ipsos South Africa)

7 September 2021

 

WEST EUROPE

(UK)

7 In 10 Parents Worried About Their Children Catching Covid-19 When They Return To School

With children starting to head back to the classroom, polling by Ipsos MORI shows a large majority of British parents with school-age children are concerned about the risk of their child(ren) catching COVID-19 while at school. Seventy per cent are concerned about this risk with only 3 in 10 untroubled. Worry increases slightly among mothers with children at school, 74% of whom are worried compared to 64% of fathers.

(Ipsos MORI)

6 September 2021

 

Just One In Five Members Of The Public Have A Positive View Of The Foreign Secretary

Only one in five people (19%) now hold a favourable view of Raab, down 3pts since mid-August. A majority of people now hold an unfavourable view of him (58%), an increase of 9pts versus August. This represents the highest level of unfavourable opinion Raab has held since our polling of him began in 2020. Overall, these latest favourability scores give the foreign secretary a net score of -39 among the general public.

(YouGov UK)

September 06, 2021

 

41% Of Britons Said Brexit Is The Main Reason For Reported Shortage Of Drivers And Supply Chain Issues

In recent weeks there has been a growing issue with a shortage of delivery drivers, with the media reporting widely on supermarkets, fast food restaurants and pubs facing problems with their supply chain. Many commentators have associated this problem with Brexit. Asked what the main reason is for the reported shortage of drivers and supply chain issues, 41% of people said Brexit, 25% the impact of the coronavirus, 11% working conditions for drivers and 7% drivers' pay.

(YouGov UK)

September 07, 2021

 

More Than Two In Five Think Christmas Will Be Free Of Pandemic Restrictions

According to reports, the October lockdown could be implemented if COVID-19 hospitalisations continue at their current rate and overwhelm the NHS - something the government has since denied. However, most people (57%) predict that October 2021 to January 2022 will see fewer hospitalisations than the same period a year ago – a period that encompassed the bulk of the UK’s second wave. Yet some 31% of people think that this year could be on par (16%) or worse (15%) than the previous period in terms of people admitted to hospital.

(YouGov UK)

September 08, 2021

 

Twenty Years On, 80% Of Britons Still Remember Where They Were On 9/11

Two decades have passed since terrorists brought down the Twin Towers in hijacked planes in an unprecedented attack on the US, killing nearly 3,000 people. A new YouGov survey now shows that 80% of Britons can still remember where they were when they heard the news of the incident. Only one in ten people (10%) can’t remember their whereabouts when hearing the news, while another 8% were too young or not yet born.

(YouGov UK)

September 09, 2021

 

55% Of Arsenal Supporters Interviewed With Yougov Direct Said They Were Confident In The Team

Arsenal have had a rough start to the 2021/22 season, with three back-to-back losses sending them to the bottom of the table. As a result, confidence among Gunners fans has taken a significant dive. Before the season kicked off, 55% of Arsenal supporters interviewed with YouGov Direct said they were confident in the team. This figure has since dropped 27pts to just over a quarter (28%). This trend is not limited to Arsenal, with fans of several other teams having lost a lot of faith, including Leeds United (79%, down 14 pts from pre-season) and Leicester City (84%, down 13pts). 

(YouGov UK)

September 09, 2021

 

4 In 10 Britons Think Country Heading In Wrong Direction But Johnson Much More Popular Than Starmer Among Their Own Voters

Ahead of party conference season, a new Ipsos MORI poll of Britons aged 18+ (taken before the recent NI announcement) shows that 44% of Britons think things are heading in the wrong direction (no change from July) and 29% think things are heading in the right direction (-1 point). The data shows a predictable party split on this measure with 48% of 2019 Conservative voters saying things are heading in the right direction compared to 64% of Labour voters saying things are heading in the wrong direction.

(Ipsos MORI)

10 September 2021

 

Most Britons 57% Want To Ban Cigarettes – And Half Want To Ban Vaping Products

It’s a move that’s broadly in tune with public sentiment: new polling from YouGov shows that close to three in five Britons (57%) support an outright ban on the sale of cigarettes, compared to a third (32%) who do not. And while one in five (19%) are in favour of a ban from 2030 onwards, two in five (38%) want the government to move even faster – outlawing these products either immediately or in the near future.

(YouGov UK)

September 10, 2021

 

NORTH AMERICA

(USA)

Ahead Of The COVID-19 Recession The Unemployment Rate Was Below 4%

The median wage of employed U.S. workers had held steady at about $21 per hour for several calendar quarters before the coronavirus outbreak. With the unemployment rate hovering below 4% ahead of the COVID-19 recession, even if unemployed workers were included – at zero earnings – there was little effect on the estimated median wage, nudging it down to about $20 in 2019, but no more. (Wages are adjusted for inflation and expressed in 2021 second-quarter dollars.)

(PEW)

SEPTEMBER 7, 2021

 

62% Of Adults With A Disability Say They Own A Desktop Or Laptop Computer

Some 62% of adults with a disability say they own a desktop or laptop computer, compared with 81% of those without a disability, according to a Pew Research Center survey of U.S. adults conducted Jan. 25-Feb. 8, 2021. And when it comes to smartphone ownership, there is a gap of 16 percentage points between those with a disability and those without one (72% vs. 88%).

(PEW)

SEPTEMBER 10, 2021

 

(Canada)

46% Of Canadians Who Say They Are Going To Support A Party On Election Day Are Absolutely Certain Of Their Vote Choice

According to a new Ipsos poll conducted on behalf of Global News, only 46% of Canadians who say they are going to support a party on election day are absolutely certain of their vote choice, leaving the remaining voters less sure (39% fairly certain; 11% not very certain; 4% not at all certain). Conservative voters (49%, +3 since the start of the campaign) and Liberal voters (49%, +1) are most likely to be absolutely certain of their choice, with NDP (43%, +6), Bloc (43%, +13) and Green Party (26%, +13) supporters less certain of their choice.

(Ipsos Canada)

6 September 2021

 

One In Eight (13%) Canadians Is Completely Undecided On How To Vote

Over the course of the election campaign, Ipsos polling has revealed that one in eight (13%) Canadians is completely undecided on how they will vote in this federal election. A closer examination of this key group of voters reveals who they are, how they feel and what is important to them when considering how to cast their ballot. Two in three (67%) are women; one in three (33%) are men.

(Ipsos Canada)

9 September 2021

 

AUSTRALIA

The Australian Economy Grew By A Stunning 9.6% Over The Year To June 2021

Retailers have been the big winners during this period and the top four most trusted brands again comprise some of Australia’s leading retail brands led by Woolworths, Coles, Bunnings Warehouse and ALDI in fourth place. Notably, there have been four big improvers in the June quarter 2021 with Department Stores Kmart, Myer, Big W and Target all improving their standing as some of Australia’s most trusted brands. Kmart has entered the top 5, both Myer and Big W are new entrants to the top 10 and Target jumped seven spots in the quarter to be just outside the top 10.

(Roy Morgan)

September 07 2021

 

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES

4 Out Of 10 Brazilians Want To Go Back To Working Outside The Home At The End Of The Pandemic

The Return to the Workplace 2021 Global Survey, carried out by Ipsos in 29 nations – including Brazil – showed that 40% of respondents in the country want to work outside their homes in the post-pandemic period. A slightly smaller percentage, 31%, prefer to work more or completely at home-office. 9% prefer to work from home as much as they used to do before the health crisis, 10% did not know how to answer and 11% said that the nature of their work does not allow them to choose where to work. On the global average, the percentage of people who want to work outside the home is 33%.

(Ipsos Brazil)

8 September 2021

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/pt-br/4-em-cada-10-brasileiros-querem-voltar-trabalhar-fora-de-casa-ao-fim-da-pandemia

 

Most Adults Vaccinated Against Covid-19 In All 13 Countries Surveyed Intend To Get A Booster Shot

In each of the 13 countries surveyed, a large majority of adults who have received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine strongly or somewhat agree they would get a booster shot if it were available today, 90%+ in Brazil (96%), Mexico (93%), and China (90%); 80%+ in Australia (82%), the United Kingdom (82%), and the United States (81%); 70%+ in Canada (77%), Spain (73%), Japan (72%), France (70%), and Germany (70%); and 60%+ in Italy (66%) and Russia (62%).

(Ipsos Canada)

10 September 2021

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/global-attitudes-covid-19-vaccine-booster-shots


 

ASIA

707-43-01/Polls

Indian Consumers, Reveals A Spending Propensity Of 90.71 Among Urban Indians This Festive Season

The festive season has commenced in India and now everyone is eagerly awaiting the festival of lights. Although brands are betting big on Diwali to light up sales, are consumers ready to shop again?

YouGov’s Diwali Spending Index, an indicator of the spending intent among Indian consumers, reveals a spending propensity of 90.71 among urban Indians this festive season. Even though it is below average (of 100), the intent to spend is higher than last time (80.96), indicating a recovering appetite to spend among urban Indians.

The Index is calculated as a weighted impact of 10 factors (like increase in gross household income, increase/decrease in household expenses, intent to invest or splurge and general optimism towards economy) on their intent to spend more/less this Diwali season versus last.

Among the 10 factors, the number one driver for people to spend more this year is their anticipation for the festival. Nearly a third (31%) agreed with the statement “I am looking forward to Diwali this year since the rest of the year has been quite dull because of Covid-19”.

With nearly two years having passed and shoppers having no opportunity to spend, this is likely to be the factor that has improved the overall sentiment to spend more this Diwali as compared to last.

Even though there is an improvement, the biggest barrier to spending continues to be the same as last year. Close to 50% of respondents last year said they are more careful with their finances today than they used to be in the past. And now a similar proportion (43.6%) said the same thing, indicating the fear of the uncertain is still strong among the public.

Given 2021 witnessed a devastating wave of covid, despite excitement among the public for Diwali this year, the consumer sentiment is yet to match the pre-pandemic times.

Data shows that only 17% of the respondents said they were likely to spend more than last year during Diwali in 2020. In 2021, this number has increased and now 29% said they will spend more this year. While the spending intent is yet to go back to normal (pre-pandemic times), we see a marked improvement since last year and this is good news for brands trying to woo consumers this festive season.

In YouGov’s Diwali series, we will see the impact of the pandemic on consumers’ buying sentiment across different sectors to see if the upcoming festive season can be a game-changer for businesses and brands.

(YouGov India)

September 7, 2021

Source: https://in.yougov.com/en-hi/news/2021/09/07/urban-indians-festive-spending-intent-has-improved/

 

707-43-02/Polls

Three In Ten Urban Indians Have Changed Their Primary Bank In The Past

YouGov’s latest survey reveals close to a third (31%) of urban Indians claim to have changed their primary bank in the past five years or more. Among different generations, millennials appear to be the most visible switchers and are much more likely than Gen X to have changed their primary bank in the past (41% vs 23%).

Among those who switched their banks in the past, convenience (29%) was stated as the key reason to switch, followed by more products & benefits (27%) and better interest rates (26%). These claims were made far more strongly by the millennials as compared to the other generations.

While convenience was the main reason to switch for all the surveyed respondents, nearly a quarter (23%) switched in order to move to a bank that offers digital services or is a digital only bank, highlighting the building appetite for online banking in the country.

Looking into the future banking preferences, we see more than half of urban Indians (54%) said they are likely to switch from a traditional to a digital bank in the near future. Once again we see millennials being most likely to say they will switch their bank in the future (at 61%), perhaps because they are already used to shifting banks and are more likely to be swayed by better services and benefits.

Among the genders, men as compared to women are more likely to switch in the future (58% vs 50%).

At present, more than half of the surveyed respondents (54%) do only online or most of their banking online, a third do banking both online and offline (34%), and only one in ten (11%) do banking only or mostly offline.

While the intent to switch to an online-only bank in the future is higher among respondents who only or mostly bank online (at 63%), those who bank both online and offline were also more likely than unlikely (47% vs 17%) to say they will switch to a digital bank in the future.

The biggest benefit of banking online according to people is the 24*7 accessibility of services (68%). Digital banking also gives people the benefit of avoiding crowded places (61%) as well as ease of process (59%) and convenience (58%). The pandemic has expanded the reach of digital payment options and 55% find the wide-scale acceptance of digital payment modes valuable.

Cashbacks and rewards appeal more to the millennials than the GenX, while the older cohort is more likely to find the round-the-clock accessibility as well as ease and convenience of banking the biggest advantage of digital banking.

When asked about the various forms of digital banking, Unified Payments Interface or UPI payments emerged as the most preferred form of digital banking for nearly a third (31%) of respondents. Other preferred forms include internet & mobile banking (22%), mobile wallets, and banking cards (21% each) are other preferred forms of digital banking.

UPI payment is notably more popular among the millennials than GenX respondents (34% vs 25%), while the latter are more likely to prefer internet and mobile banking than their younger counterparts (27% vs 21%).

Commenting on this, Deepa Bhatia, General Manager, YouGov India said, “Banking has been considered for long as a more traditional industry with high switching costs but with the advent of digital banking services, we can see the switching costs come down. Millennials, those aged between 30 and 40years old, one of the most sought-after cohorts have been particularly open to switching their primary bank accounts and are fairly open to digital banks. Banking needs to learn about the changing motivations of their customers so as to better serve them and retain them.”

(YouGov India)

September 9, 2021

Source: https://in.yougov.com/en-hi/news/2021/09/09/three-ten-urban-indians-have-changed-their-primary/

 

AFRICA

707-43-03/Polls

More Than Three-Fourths (77%) Of Guineans Prefer Democracy To Any Other Form Of Government

Despite widespread dissatisfaction with the government’s performance, Guineans strongly

prefer democracy to any alternative form of governance, the most recent Afrobarometer

survey shows.

Barely a year after claiming a third term in office amidst widespread opposition, President

Alpha Condé has been detained since a coup d’état last Sunday. Coup leader Lt. Col.

Mamady Doumbouya has cited pervasive poverty and corruption as reasons for the

takeover.

Afrobarometer findings from late 2019 show majorities of Guineans believe that the country is

heading in the wrong direction, that the level of corruption has increased, and that the

government is doing a poor job of fighting corruption. Dissatisfaction with the country’s

economic conditions and citizens’ personal living conditions has increased, as have negative

ratings of the government’s economic performance and provision of essential public

services. Only three in 10 citizens are satisfied with the way their democracy is working.

But the study also shows that most Guineans endorse elections as the best way to choose

leaders and that citizens’ preference for democracy has remained consistently high over the

years.

Key findings

▪ More than three-fourths (77%) of Guineans prefer democracy to any other form of

government. Support for democracy has remained high since Afrobarometer began

its surveys in Guinea in 2013 (Figure 1).

▪ Eight in 10 Guineans (82%) endorse free, fair, and honest elections as the best way to

choose leaders, including 57% who “strongly agree” with this view (Figure 2).

o A similar majority (76%) want the president to serve a maximum of two terms in

office.

▪ Only four in 10 Guineans (40%) describe the country as “a full democracy” or “a

democracy with minor problems” (Figure 3).

o Only three in 10 (29%) say they are “fairly satisfied” or “very satisfied” with the way

democracy works, a sharp decline from 2017 (56%) after consistent improvement

from 2013 (39%).

▪ Almost two-thirds of Guineans (64%) say the country is heading in “the wrong

direction.”

▪ The perception that “most” or “all” officials at the Presidency are corrupt has

increased from 26% in 2013 to 47% (Figure 4).

o Almost two-thirds (63%) of citizens say the level of corruption in the country

increased during the year preceding the survey, a 25-percentage-point increase

compared to 2015 (38%).

o Eight in 10 citizens (81%) say the government is performing “fairly badly” or “very

badly” in fighting corruption, a 27-percentage-point increase compared to 2013

(54%).

▪ Almost seven in 10 citizens (68%) describe the country’s economic conditions as “fairly

bad” or “very bad,” a significant increase compared to 2013 (59%) (Figure 5).

o The proportion who say their personal living conditions are “fairly bad” or “very

bad” has also increased, to 64%.

▪ About nine in 10 Guineans say the government is doing “fairly badly” or “very badly”

at narrowing income gaps (90%), creating jobs (89%), and improving living standards

of the poor (85%) (Figure 6).

o Seven in 10 (72%) rate the government poorly on its performance in managing

the economy.

▪ Overwhelming majorities also say the government is doing a poor job of maintaining

roads and bridges (92%), providing water and sanitation services (85%), providing a

reliable supply of electricity (83%), addressing educational needs (73%), and

improving basic health services (72%) (Figure 7).

(Afrobarometer)

6 September 2021

Source: https://afrobarometer.org/sites/default/files/press-release/Guinea/news_release-guineans_prefer_democracy-7sept21.pdf

 

707-43-04/Polls

More Than One In Four Gambian Citizens (28%) Say They Or A Member Of Their Family Suffered Human-Rights Abuses Under Jammeh’s Regime

A growing number of Gambians want perpetrators of crimes and human-rights abuses

during former President Yahya Jammeh’s administration to be tried in court, the latest

Afrobarometer study shows.

Over the past three years, the proportion of citizens in favour of seeking Jammeh’s

extradition has also increased significantly. However, opinions are divided on the

government’s decision to sell Jammeh’s properties and on whether he should be

allowed to return to the country.

The Gambia’s Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC) was established

by Parliament in December 2017 as part of a broad transitional-justice mechanism to

address human-rights abuses under Jammeh’s regime and prevent their recurrence.

After two years of televised public hearings, the commission is expected to submit its final

report to President Adama Barrow in September 2021. Although widely credited with

highlighting past human-rights abuses, the commission has also been engulfed in

controversies, including accusations of conducting a witch-hunt against Jammeh.

Key findings

▪ Almost three-fourths (73%) of Gambians say perpetrators of crimes and human-rights

abuses during Jammeh’s regime should be tried in court, a 5-percentage-point

increase compared to 2018 (Figure 1).

▪ Six in 10 Gambians (61%) say the government should seek the extradition of Jammeh,

a 10-percentage point increase compared to 2018.

▪ More than one in four citizens (28%) say they or a member of their family suffered

human-rights abuses under Jammeh’s regime (Figure 2).

▪ Citizens expect the TRRC’s work to lead to a variety of outcomes, including national

peace, reconciliation, forgiveness, and healing (34%); accurate records of humanrights abuses of the previous regime (30%); prosecution of accused perpetrators

(28%); and support for victims and their families to overcome long-held pain (16%)

(Figure 3).

(Afrobarometer)

6 September 2021

Source: https://afrobarometer.org/sites/default/files/press-release/The%20Gambia/news_release-more_gambians_want_trials_for_crimes_under_jammeh-afrobarometer-ma-3sept21.pdf

 

707-43-05/Polls

A Majority (58%) Of Tanzanians Say They Have Heard Of Social Media

A majority of Tanzanians support unrestricted access to social media, but most are also wary

of its potential dangers, the latest Afrobarometer survey shows.

Among Tanzanians who have heard of social media, large majorities believe that such

platforms help make people more informed and effective citizens. However, most also say

that social media make people more likely to believe false news and more intolerant of

people with different opinions.

Overall, Tanzanians are almost evenly divided on whether the impact of social media on

society is positive or negative.

Key findings

One in five Tanzanians say they get news from social media every day (13%) or “a

few times a week) (7%). In total, 27% of citizens say they use social media for news at

least on occasion, a 9-percentage-point increase compared to 2017 (Figure 1).

A majority (58%) of Tanzanians say they have heard of social media (Figure 2).

o Awareness of social media is higher among men and urbanites than among

women and rural residents, and increases strongly with respondents’ education

level, ranging from 20% of those with no formal education to 96% of those with

post-secondary qualifications. Youth (69%) are almost twice as likely to be familiar

with social media as older citizens (37%).

Among those who have heard of social media:

o Most believe that it makes people more aware of current happenings (89%) and

helps people impact political processes (72%) (Figure 3).

o But large majorities also say that it makes people more likely to believe false news

(76%) and more intolerant of others with different political opinions (71%).

o Overall, Tanzanians are almost evenly split in their views on the effect of social

media on society: 39% see its impact as positive, while 37% say it is negative

(Figure 4).

More than half (54%) of Tanzanians say that access to social media and the Internet

should be unrestricted, while one-third (33%) want access to be regulated by the

government (Figure 5).

o Educated citizens, youth, men, and urban residents are less likely to support the

regulation of social media.

(Afrobarometer)

8 September 2021

Source: https://afrobarometer.org/sites/default/files/press-release/Tanzania/news_release-tanzanians_want_unrestricted_access_to_social_media-afrobarometer-7sept21.pdf

 

707-43-06/Polls

Seven In Every Ten (71%) South Africans Have Indicated That They Would Vote In The Coming Local Government Elections

The IEC, supported by some political parties, brought this application before the apex court due to the complications in organising local government elections in the middle of the Covid-19 pandemic. The Constitutional Court ruled that the elections should be scheduled between 27 October and 1 November 2021.

The court ruled that the IEC must comply with the Constitutional prescription that elections should be held within five years and ninety days of the date of the previous local government elections. The IEC has also been ordered to announce a date for a voter registration weekend within three days of the court’s ruling.

Although the IEC could still approach the Parliament of the Republic of South Africa and seek a postponement of the elections by amending the Constitution, this will require a two-thirds majority in Parliament, and it is uncertain if there will be enough support to delay the polls.

Approaching Parliament would probably limit the little time left to organise and formulate the logistics of this rather complex process. As there are 278 municipalities1 in South Africa, this essentially means that everything necessary to successfully organise and implement 278 mini-elections should be done in less than two months.

The national picture – uncertainty and a limited appetite for voting

On the ground very little campaigning has so far been done for these elections and it is difficult for political parties to organise meetings, rallies and all the other usual opportunities to speak to voters. The reasons are clear. Covid-19 restrictions limit the number of people who can get together in the same place.

But how do South African voters feel about these elections? There are around 39 million South Africans eligible to vote – i.e. 18 years or older, but not all of them are registered. In fact, less than 20 million voted in the last national election in 2019.

Will South Africans turn out to vote this time or will fear of Covid-19 keep them away? Or will those who want to vote now visit vaccination centres in droves?

In both the 2016 local government elections and the 2019 national and provincial elections, voter turnout was down from previous elections. So, is voter apathy still an issue?

Voters have expressed their discontent with politics and political parties in various ways over the last few years. Will this have an influence on voter turnout, or perhaps on the political parties themselves?

Traditionally the voter turnout in local government elections is lower compared to national and provincial elections – will this be the case again?

Ipsos has undertaken a CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing) study from 16 to 20 August 2021, interviewing 1,501 randomly selected adults in the country about some of these issues2.

The table overleaf look at some comparisons over time:

  • In the second column the support the three biggest parties achieved in the previous national election in 2019 is reflected (www.elections.org.za)
  • In the third column support for the three biggest parties as measured by Ipsos in a face-to-face poll of 3,479 randomly selected individuals, representative of adults 18 years and older in November 2019 is reflected – asking respondents which party they would vote for in a national election (Ipsos Khayabus, Wave 3, November 2019)
  • In the fourth column support for the three biggest parties as measured by Ipsos in a face-to-face poll of 3,469 randomly selected individuals, representative of adults 18 years and older in December 2020 is reflected – asking respondents which party they would vote for in a local government election (Ipsos Khayabus, Wave 2, December 2020), and
  • In the fifth column support for all parties registering support of more than 1% in the poll conducted telephonically by Ipsos in August 2021 is reflected – asking respondents which party they would vote for in a local government election.
  • If they did not choose a party, they were asked to give a reason for this (Ipsos CATI Snap Poll, August 2021).

Please note that this table shows results for ALL SOUTH AFRICANS 18 YEARS AND OLDER – it cannot in any way be construed as a possible prediction of the outcome of the local government elections.

This table shows a steady decline in support for the ANC in polls involving the total population eligible to vote since after the previous National Election in May 2019. Over the time of the three Ipsos studies mentioned, the DA and the EFF support stayed relatively constant, however, none of these two parties were threatening the position of the ANC as the most popular party in the country.

Some interesting reasons mentioned for not considering voting were3:

  • “I have no interest in voting in local elections. I only vote in national elections.”
  • “I will vote for whoever wants to do the job and run the country properly”
  • “I will vote for any party, as long as it is not the ANC”
  • “I’ll see who to vote for when I get to the polling station”
  • “I am unemployed, why should I vote?”

A more realistic view – what if 7 out of every 10 turn out to vote?

It is abundantly clear that not all eligible voters will vote in the local government elections at the end of October, so, “if there were a local government election tomorrow, which political party or organisation will you vote for?

Seven in every ten (71%) have indicated that they would vote in the coming local government elections. The data suggest they would also support a wide variety of parties, as reflected in the graph below.

Countrywide almost half (49.3%) will draw a cross next to the name of the ANC, while the support for both the DA (17.9%) and the EFF (14.5%) respectively, is also in double figures. South Africa has a plethora of registered political parties, but very few of them currently garner more than one percent of support. 

Please note that this is also not a prediction of the election, although a large proportion of voters have made up their minds, 7.4% of those who indicated that they will vote in the local government elections are not (yet) allocated to a political party. Predictions, for what they are worth, should only be made much closer to election day.

Who wants to vote?

Looking at those who indicated that they do want to vote in the local government elections, it is interesting that the more rural provinces of Limpopo, North West and the Eastern Cape top the list. And yet, metropolitan areas feature much more frequently in the travel plans of political leaders.

The Free State has experienced a lot of political turmoil since the last national election, very much like North West. It reacted totally differently with a much smaller proportion of voters wanting to participate in the local government elections.

(Ipsos South Africa)

7 September 2021

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-za/where-do-support-political-parties-stand

 

WEST EUROPE

707-43-07/Polls

7 In 10 Parents Worried About Their Children Catching Covid-19 When They Return To School

With children starting to head back to the classroom, polling by Ipsos MORI shows a large majority of British parents with school-age children are concerned about the risk of their child(ren) catching COVID-19 while at school. Seventy per cent are concerned about this risk with only 3 in 10 untroubled. 

Worry increases slightly among mothers with children at school, 74% of whom are worried compared to 64% of fathers. Those with children at secondary school are more likely to worry, 72% are concerned about the risk of their children catching COVID-19 while 68% of primary school parents feel the same.

Are you worried about your children catching COVID-19 at school?Looking forward to the coming academic year, over 7 in 10 (71%) believe it is likely that the number of coronavirus cases will rise as a result of children returning to school, only 8% deem this unlikely. 

While almost two-thirds (65%) think most school staff will take lateral-flow tests twice a week, as the government currently advises, only half of secondary school pupils are likely to so the same (51%). 

Predictions for the upcoming school year

Less than half of Britons (44%) expect to see exams such as GCSEs and A-Levels run as normal in 2022, 22% think this is unlikely. Parents are slightly more hopeful, 51% say exams are likely to run as usual. Four in 10 (40%) say it is likely that the proportion of pupils awarded top grades in their GCSE and A-Level exams will be higher than ever, 1 in 5 (18%) disagree. 

More than 4 in 10 (43%) believe the Government will once again be forced to close schools because of COVID-19, 1 in 4 disagree. Therefore, it may be no surprise that almost half say it is unlikely that by the end of the upcoming academic year, pupils will have caught up with any education missed since the start of the pandemic (47%), only a quarter think this is likely to happen (26%), increasing to a third of parents (33%). 

Kelly Beaver, Managing Director of Public Affairs at Ipsos MORI, said:

As pupils return to schools across the country, it’s clear that there is a certain degree of concern and trepidation about the impact of that on COVID cases, as well as concern among parents about the more direct impacts on them and their children. There are also broader educational concerns about the way that exams will be run next year and about the degree to which pupils will have ‘caught up’ on time lost academically from last year. These are important issues for parents, who’ll be watching closely to see what the Government does around this crucial area.

(Ipsos MORI)

6 September 2021

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/7-10-parents-worried-about-their-children-catching-covid-19-when-they-return-school

 

707-43-08/Polls

Just One In Five Members Of The Public Have A Positive View Of The Foreign Secretary

The foreign secretary Dominic Raab has been under intense scrutiny following his handling of the crisis in Afghanistan - from being on holiday during the start of the crisis, to delegating important tasks to junior aides. The newest YouGov favourability data shows that this approach has sent Raab’s standing with members of the public to an all-time low.

Only one in five people (19%) now hold a favourable view of Raab, down 3pts since mid-August. A majority of people now hold an unfavourable view of him (58%), an increase of 9pts versus August. This represents the highest level of unfavourable opinion Raab has held since our polling of him began in 2020.

Overall, these latest favourability scores give the foreign secretary a net score of -39 among the general public.

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/inlineimage/2021-09-06/dominic-raab-s-favourability-all-time-low.png

Along political lines, some 45% of 2019 Conservative voters have an unfavourable view of Raab versus 37% who think the opposite – giving him a net score of -8 among his party’s voters. Of Labour voters, only 8% think favourable of Raab, while 79% have an unfavourable opinion – a net score of -71.

Elsewhere, the party leaders have seen their scores increase compared to August, however they remain firmly in the negative. Boris Johnson’s net score has increased from -25 to -19, with 36% of the public viewing him favourably and 55% unfavourably. Keir Starmer has seen his net score rise 7pts from -30 to -23. Approaching three in ten (29%) now view the leader of the opposition favourably, while half (52%) hold an unfavourable view.

(YouGov UK)

September 06, 2021

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2021/09/06/dominic-raabs-favourability-all-time-low-following

 

707-43-09/Polls

41% Of Britons Said Brexit Is The Main Reason For Reported Shortage Of Drivers And Supply Chain Issues

In recent weeks there has been a growing issue with a shortage of delivery drivers, with the media reporting widely on supermarkets, fast food restaurants and pubs facing problems with their supply chain. Many commentators have associated this problem with Brexit.

Asked what the main reason is for the reported shortage of drivers and supply chain issues, 41% of people said Brexit, 25% the impact of the coronavirus, 11% working conditions for drivers and 7% drivers' pay.

However, there's a big contrast between the views of Remainers and Leavers. Among those respondents who voted Remain in 2016, 65% of people blamed the supply chain problems mostly upon Brexit. Among those respondents who voted to Leave in 2016, just 21% said the problems were due to Brexit. Leave voters are most likely to say that coronavirus is the key to the recent shortages (37%), and they are also more likely than Remain voters to think that drivers’ pay or conditions are the biggest part of the problem.

In fact, even opinions on whether there are shortages appear influenced by people's existing views on Brexit. Most people who voted Remain say they have noticed shortages on the shelves to a large or significant extent (55%), but only 40% of Leavers do.

As with most other political events, our reactions to the drivers’ shortage are largely driven by our existing views. If you are someone who thought Brexit was a thoroughly bad thing, then you are more likely to blame it on Brexit. If you are a supporter of Brexit, then you are more likely to find another reason.

So, whatever the long-term outcome of Brexit, don't necessarily expect public opinion to rapidly change. Many perceived negative impacts of Brexit will only be blamed upon Brexit by those already opposed; many positive impacts will only be accepted by those who were already in favour.

(YouGov UK)

September 07, 2021

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2021/09/07/remainers-blame-brexit-recent-food-shortages-leave

 

707-43-10/Polls

More Than Two In Five Think Christmas Will Be Free Of Pandemic Restrictions

News has broken that the government could be planning an October lockdown – despite the promise that the lifting of pandemic restrictions in July was “irreversible”. 

According to reports, the October lockdown could be implemented if COVID-19 hospitalisations continue at their current rate and overwhelm the NHS - something the government has since denied. However, most people (57%) predict that October 2021 to January 2022 will see fewer hospitalisations than the same period a year ago – a period that encompassed the bulk of the UK’s second wave. Yet some 31% of people think that this year could be on par (16%) or worse (15%) than the previous period in terms of people admitted to hospital. 

Approaching two thirds of the public (63%) think there will be fewer deaths during this time than there were last winter, while 14% think the death rate will be the same. One in eight (12%) think the coming winter could bring a higher death toll.

While people mostly think hospital admissions and deaths will decrease, a third of Britons (36%) expect the number of COVID-19 cases to be higher between October 2021 and January 2022 than the same time last year – this includes one in eight (12%) who think cases will be “much higher”. Another 28% of people think case numbers will be about the same. Only a quarter of the public (26%) think that number of infections will be lower.

Britons tend to think Christmas will be free of lockdown restrictions

It has been suggested that the so-called “firebreak lockdown” could see the October half-term extended, but makes no mention of what might happen later in the year. Two fifths of Britons (44%), however, are expecting a Christmas period free of pandemic restrictions. On the other hand, a third (36%) think there will be some COVID-19 restrictions in place for the festive period once again.

Those aged 65 and above are the least likely to think Christmas will be business as usual without restrictions (36%), but another 40% think there will be some rules in place for the festive holiday. On the other hand, those aged between 18 and 24 are the most hopeful of a restriction-free Christmas (48%) with around a quarter (23%) thinking at least some form of rules will be in place.

(YouGov UK)

September 08, 2021

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/health/articles-reports/2021/09/08/fewer-covid-19-hospitalisations-winter-2021

 

707-43-11/Polls

Twenty Years On, 80% Of Britons Still Remember Where They Were On 9/11

Two decades have passed since terrorists brought down the Twin Towers in hijacked planes in an unprecedented attack on the US, killing nearly 3,000 people. A new YouGov survey now shows that 80% of Britons can still remember where they were when they heard the news of the incident. Only one in ten people (10%) can’t remember their whereabouts when hearing the news, while another 8% were too young or not yet born.

Britons aged 50 to 64 are the most likely to remember the day, with 93% saying it’s still fresh in their memory. Among 18-24-year-olds, 7% remember where they were when they first heard about the attacks, despite the oldest people in this group having been only four years old at the time.

Fewer Britons believe 9/11 changed the world completely than ten years ago

While a large share of the public are convinced that the world was not the same after 9/11, this number of those believing it became radically different has fallen over time. Two fifths of Britons (42%) say the terrorist incident “changed the world completely” – down from 53% a decade ago. Another 45% believe it changed it “a little”, which is slightly higher than in 2011, at 38%.

Only one in twelve people either say it did not change very much (6%) or not at all (2%), which is similar to previously (5% not very much, 2% not at all).

Three in five Britons (59%) likewise say that the 11 September attacks have had a larger impact on the world than the 2007-08 global financial crisis, a similar figure to the number who said so in 2018 (54%) on the 10th anniversary of the crisis. Around three in ten people (30%) currently believe the financial crisis – which until the coronavirus pandemic had been the worst recession since the 1920s – had a greater impact (from 32% in 2018).

Conservative voters are slightly more likely than Labour members to say the 9/11 attacks had a larger impact on the world at 65% vs 54%.

But while many people still vividly remember hearing about the attacks, and several terror incidents having happened in the UK since, few Britons fear for their safety in this context.

Some 8% of the public believe there’s a ‘very’ (1%) or ‘fairly’ (7%) high chance they or someone close to them would become injured or killed in a terrorist attack. This is similar to both in 2011 (1% very high, 6% fairly high) and 2006 (2% very high, 6% fairly high).

While the proportion of people who feel the odds are high remains the same, fewer people now say the possibility is ‘almost non-existent’ or ‘very low’ than previously.

In 2006 and 2011, one in four Britons (25%) believed there was virtually no chance they or a loved one could become a victim of terrorism, while another 29-30% felt the chance was very low.

Today, only a fifth (18%) regard the possibility as near non-existent, while a quarter (24%) see it as very low. Instead the most common answer is ‘fairly low’ at 36% - 5-6 points higher than in 2011 and 2006.

(YouGov UK)

September 09, 2021

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2021/09/09/twenty-years-80-britons-still-remember-where-they-

 

707-43-12/Polls

55% Of Arsenal Supporters Interviewed With Yougov Direct Said They Were Confident In The Team

A new YouGov Direct survey of Premier League fans reveals that the opening weeks of the 2021/22 season have already prompted big swings in the opinions of supporters. Using YouGov Direct, we interviewed the same group of fans twice, once before the season in mid-August, and again during the international break, to see how the start of the season has affected attitudes.  

Are fans confident in their team and manager?

Arsenal have had a rough start to the 2021/22 season, with three back-to-back losses sending them to the bottom of the table. As a result, confidence among Gunners fans has taken a significant dive. Before the season kicked off, 55% of Arsenal supporters interviewed with YouGov Direct said they were confident in the team. This figure has since dropped 27pts to just over a quarter (28%). This trend is not limited to Arsenal, with fans of several other teams having lost a lot of faith, including Leeds United (79%, down 14 pts from pre-season) and Leicester City (84%, down 13pts). 

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/inlineimage/2021-09-09/Confidence%20final.png

For others, however, it is quite the opposite. Tottenham Hotspur have seen three consecutive winners under new boss Nuno Espírito Santo. This winning streak, as well as successfully retaining key striker Harry Kane for the foreseeable future, could be behind the 20pt rise in confidence in the team. Some 80% of Spurs fans interviewed are now confident in the team, compared to 60% of the same group before the season began. Everton too has seen a 20pt boost in confidence, rising from 41% to 61% off the back of two wins and a draw in the first three games of the season. 

Of the other teams in the league, Liverpool, Chelsea, and Manchester City all tie for the highest level of confidence, with 92% of fans for each team being confident in their squads. They are closely followed by 90% of Manchester United fans. Newcastle United fans are the least confident, at just 14%. 

It is a similar story when fans were asked about their club’s manager. Unsurprisingly, confidence in Nuno Espírito Santo among Tottenham fans YouGov interviewed grew from 64% to 83% following his successful opening campaign, including nearly a quarter who are now “very confident” in Nuno (24%).

The opposite is true for Arsenal his rival, Mikel Arteta. Following a poor start to the season, confidence among Gunners fans interviewed is down 32pts compared to before the season, with just a third (35%) now holding confidence in the manager. Some six in ten (61%) of the Arsenal fans YouGov interviewed are not confident in Arteta’s leadership - including 26% who are “not at all confident” in their manager.

Only Newcastle United manager Steve Bruce receives less confidence. Just 19% of Newcastle fans interviewed say they have confidence in him, versus 71% who do not.

Who will win the league this year?

The big question, of course, is whether Manchester City will make it another back-to-back Premier league win this year. They are the bookies’ favourite to lift the trophy, but research with YouGov Direct shows that the proportion of fans predicting another win for Pep Guardiola has fallen since the start of the season. 

Overall, 32% of fans interviewed pick City as the winner, down 18pts from 50% before the season began. Elsewhere, 19% say Chelsea are the likely victors, up 7pts since the beginning of the season. Another 17% think that Manchester United could secure their first Premier League win since Sir Alex Ferguson left the club – also up 7pts since August.

Following their strong start to the season, the proportion of Spurs fans saying thinking Tottenham stand a chance of winning has risen an additional 27pts on the pre-season survey – the biggest increase among the teams surveyed. Tottenham fans are now split between 34% who think Spurs could win, and 32% who think Manchester City will again.

Elsewhere fans of teams also jostling for the top spot back themselves, including 69% of Chelsea fans who think Chelsea will win – up 12pts from 57% in August. Six in ten (60%) Manchester United fans back themselves, 20pts more than did so before the season began, and 59% of Liverpool fans think Liverpool will win, increasing 8pts versus pre-season.

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/inlineimage/2021-09-09/confidence_premier_league_fans_win.png

Some 15% of Newcastle fans think the Magpies could bring it back for a win, up from 2% before the season. Hopes have risen among nearly all teams, in fact, even among Arsenal fans. Some 18% now say that Arsenal will win the Premier League this season, up 5pts from 13% in August.

Manchester City supporters are the most confident they will win (79%) – however they are the only team to see a decrease in confidence following the start of the season. Before the season, 82% predicted a City win.

Who is expecting a top four finish? 

Beyond the trophy, there are four Champion’s League spots up for grabs for the top four teams, and while there are clear favourites among fans YouGov interviewed, there is sure to be stiff competition. Some 96% of Liverpool fans interviewed are confident in a top-four position, as are 93% of United supporters, 92% of Manchester City fans, and 91% of Chelsea fans. Elsewhere, some 65% of Leicester supporters think they could pinch a top-four spot, although this is down 10pts since the beginning of the season. 

Emboldened by early victories, nearly two-thirds of Spurs fans interviewed think Tottenham could see a return to the Champion’s League this year. This represents an increase of 23pts from mid-August. At that time, most fans (55%) had instead been predicting a mid-table finish.

Just one in eight Arsenal fans (13%) are confident they will finish among the top four, down from 33% in mid-August, with the majority (60%) now expecting a mid-table finish. However, nearly a quarter (23%) expect to be near the bottom of the table by the end of the season. 

Newcastle United fans do not hold out high hopes for the 2021/22 season either: 25% fear relegation is likely for the team this year, up from 5% before the season began. Some 60% expect to finish towards the bottom of the table, a figure largely unchanged from pre-season, while the 30% who initially thought a mid-table finish was possible has since dropped to only 10%. 

(YouGov UK)

September 09, 2021

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/sport/articles-reports/2021/09/09/yougov-direct-premier-league-confidence-arsenal

 

707-43-13/Polls

4 In 10 Britons Think Country Heading In Wrong Direction But Johnson Much More Popular Than Starmer Among Their Own Voters

  • Ahead of party conferences, 44% think Britain is heading in the wrong direction. 29% right direction.
  • More Britons unfavourable towards Conservatives and Labour than favourable
  • But Johnson has slightly higher favourable numbers than Starmer as Conservatives like Johnson more than Labour voters like Starmer

Ahead of party conference season, a new Ipsos MORI poll of Britons aged 18+ (taken before the recent NI announcement) shows that 44% of Britons think things are heading in the wrong direction (no change from July) and 29% think things are heading in the right direction (-1 point). The data shows a predictable party split on this measure with 48% of 2019 Conservative voters saying things are heading in the right direction compared to 64% of Labour voters saying things are heading in the wrong direction.

Favourability towards parties

Roughly equal numbers of Britons are favourable towards the two main political parties with more Britons being unfavourable than favourable for both:

  • 28% favourable towards the Conservatives (+1 point from July) and 43% unfavourable (-2 points).
  • 25% are favourable towards Labour (-1 point from July) and 44% are unfavourable (+2 points).
  • Equal numbers of 2019 Conservative and Labour voters are favourable towards their respective parties. 59% of 2019 Conservative voters are favourable towards the Conservative Party and 60% of 2019 Labour voters are favourable towards the Labour Party.

Favourability towards political parties - September 2021 - Ipsos MORI


Favourability towards leaders

More Britons are unfavourable towards Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Labour leader Keir Starmer than are favourable but Johnson enjoys higher favourables than Starmer as Conservative voters feel warmer to him than Labour voters do to Starmer.

  • Overall, 28% of Britons are favourable towards Johnson (+1 point from July) and 46% are unfavourable (-1 point).  58% of 2019 Conservative voters are favourable towards Johnson.
  • For Starmer, 20% are favourable overall (-3 points from July) and 44% are unfavourable (+6) – returning him to scores seen in June. In contrast to Johnson’s position with Conservatives, just 39% of 2019 Labour voters are favourable towards Starmer.
  • Elsewhere, Rishi Sunak’s favourables continue to fall. 34% are favourable towards the Chancellor and 30% unfavourable. In March – post Budget – 44% were favourable and 25% unfavourable.
  • Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab has the lowest favourables on our list with just 16% of Britons favourable and 45% unfavourable.

Favourability of leading politicians - September 2021 - Ipsos MORI

Favourability of leading politicians: Among those who voted for their party at GE2019 - September 2021 - Ipsos MORI

Impact of Brexit

  • 43% think the UK's decision to leave the EU has had a negative impact on the country (+3 points from July) and 30% think it has had a positive impact (-3 points). Meanwhile, 20% think it has made no difference and 7% say they don’t know.

Commenting on the findings, Ipsos MORI Research Director Keiran Pedley said

As we approach party conference season neither the Conservatives nor Labour enjoy a particular strong brand position, with more Britons negative than positive about both. However, Johnson goes into his conference in a stronger position than Starmer, with Conservative voters more positive about the Prime Minister than Labour voters are about their leader. Whether this remains to be the case as the row over National Insurance and Social Care rumbles on is still to be determined.

(Ipsos MORI)

10 September 2021

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/4-in-10-britons-think-country-heading-wrong-direction

 

707-43-14/Polls

Most Britons 57% Want To Ban Cigarettes – And Half Want To Ban Vaping Products

The global tobacco firm Philip Morris International (PMI) recently announced its support for a nationwide ban on the sale of cigarettes within a decade. The Marlboro maker also indicated that it would withdraw its own cigarette brands from UK shelves in the same timeframe.

It’s a move that’s broadly in tune with public sentiment: new polling from YouGov shows that close to three in five Britons (57%) support an outright ban on the sale of cigarettes, compared to a third (32%) who do not. And while one in five (19%) are in favour of a ban from 2030 onwards, two in five (38%) want the government to move even faster – outlawing these products either immediately or in the near future.

PMI CEO Jacek Olczak says that government action would “end the confusion” around “smoke-free alternatives” such as e-cigarettes, which the Benson & Hedges manufacturer will emphasise as it attempts to evolve into a “healthcare and wellness” company.

But our research shows that Britons also tend to favour banning vaping products: a quarter (27%) of the public would remove them from sale as soon as possible, while a fifth (21%) would ban them from 2030 onwards. Overall, half are in favour of a nationwide vape escape (48%) – now or later – while just over a third are opposed (36%).

Along age lines, people in the 18-24 group are slightly more likely to favour outlawing cigarettes at some point (60%) and less likely to be in favour of allowing them to remain on sale (24%), while over-65s aren’t far off general public opinion: 39% want to ban them now, 19% want them banned further in the future, and 32% don’t want a ban at all. By contrast, older Britons are most supportive of a ban on vaping products: more than half (52%) of over-65s want to see them prohibited compared to 46% of 18-24s, with a third (32%) favouring an imminent ban compared to just a quarter (24%) of the youngest cohort.

While an outright ban on smoking and vaping may not be on the cards just yet, recent reports suggest that the government is considering raising the legal age of buying tobacco to 21 – and outlawing the sale of flavoured e-cigarettes entirely.

(YouGov UK)

September 10, 2021

Source: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/health/articles-reports/2021/09/10/most-britons-want-ban-cigarettes-and-half-want-ban

 

NORTH AMERICA

707-43-15/Polls

Ahead Of The COVID-19 Recession The Unemployment Rate Was Below 4%

Despite the severity of the shock to the U.S. labor market from the coronavirus pandemic, the earnings of employed workers overall were largely unaffected by the pandemic. Inequality in earnings did rise during last year’s recessionif the unemployed are assumed to have had no compensation. Even so, the spike was relatively short-lived, in keeping with the record low duration of the recession, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of government data.

A line graph showing that the U.S. median wage rose in the COVID-19 recession as lower-wage workers lost jobs

Earnings overall have held steady through the pandemic in part because lower-wage workers experienced steeper job losses. Thus, the typical employed worker in 2020 earned more than the typical employed worker in 2019. A slowdown in inflation in 2020 benefited all workers, boosting the purchasing power of their earnings. While unemployed workers lost their earnings, at least some relief came through unemployment insurance, a federal package known as the CARES Act and a moratorium on residential evictions.   

The median wage of employed U.S. workers had held steady at about $21 per hour for several calendar quarters before the coronavirus outbreak. With the unemployment rate hovering below 4% ahead of the COVID-19 recession, even if unemployed workers were included – at zero earnings – there was little effect on the estimated median wage, nudging it down to about $20 in 2019, but no more. (Wages are adjusted for inflation and expressed in 2021 second-quarter dollars.)

As the pandemic struck, lower-wage workers proved most likely to experience a job loss. The shift toward higher-wage workers among the employed helped to raise the median hourly wage to $23 in the second quarter of 2020. The median wage of all workers, including the unemployed, remained unchanged at about $20 per hour, likely because many workers who lost their job already earned less than the median.

The median wage for employed and unemployed workers combined has remained about the same since the end of the recession in April 2020. But the median wage among employed workers alone has drifted down since the second quarter of 2020 as the unemployment rate dropped and lower-wage jobs were partially restored. In the second quarter of 2021, employed workers’ median wage stood at about $22 per hour. It is possible that it may decrease further as employment in lower-wage jobs returns to pre-pandemic levels.  

A bar chart showing that two different samples of employed workers point to gains in earnings in 2020 and losses more recently

Although the change in the composition of employed workers toward higher-wage workers clouds the picture of how earnings have evolved during the pandemic, it is possible to gain insight by focusing on the change in earnings for the same workers over time. Federal household survey data used in this analysis records the earnings of many workers at two points in time a year apart. The sample of employed workers matched over time is a subset of the overall sample, which varies with the addition and departure of some survey respondents. It offers another view of how earnings changed during the COVID-19 recession and afterward.

The median wage of the varying sample of employed workers – the full cross-section of workers by quarter – had risen to $23.19 in the second quarter of 2020. This represented an increase of 10.2% over the median wage in the second quarter of 2019. The median wage for the matched sample of employed workers – the same workers over time – also increased over this period, from $23.15 to $24.12, or by 4.2%. While both samples point to higher earnings in 2020 despite the onset of the pandemic, the much greater increase in the varying sample points to the sizable role played by the loss of lower-wage jobs in driving up the increase in the median.

Regardless of the sample, the earnings of employed workers in 2020 remained higher than in 2019, albeit less so with the passage of time. As the unemployment rate fell, the initial rise in the median wage of the varying sample of workers moderated through the course of 2020. By the fourth quarter of 2020, the earnings of employed workers in either sample were about 5.5% higher than in the fourth quarter of 2019. Nonetheless, despite the pandemic and an economic slowdown, most workers saw higher earnings in 2020.   

Those gains proved fleeting, however. In the first quarter of 2021, the median wage of the matched sample of workers stood 2.9% higher than their wage in the first quarter of 2020. But, by the second quarter of 2021, the median wage of the matched sample was 0.7% less than it was a year earlier, and the median wage of the varying sample had fallen by 6.1%. The larger decrease for the varying sample is driven again by the changing composition of employed workers, this time shifting toward lower-wage workers.

The recent decline in wages, adjusted for inflation, is also partly due to an acceleration in the growth in U.S. consumer prices in 2021. Previously, consumer prices increased 1.4% from 2019 to 2020, compared with 2.3% from 2018 to 2019. This helped sustain higher earnings for workers in 2020. However, inflation has ticked up recently, with consumer prices registering an increase of 4.8% in the second quarter of 2021 compared with the second quarter of 2020. Thus, the earnings of workers have eroded in recent months, including for the matched sample of workers.

Earnings changed similarly for high- and low-wage workers from 2019 to 2021, leaving inequality unaffected

The earnings of low-wage workers – those in the first quintile of earners – and high-wage workers – those in the fifth quintile of earners – evolved similarly from 2019 to 2021. The sole exception is the drop in the median wage of the first quintile of earners in 2020 when the unemployed are retained in the sample.

Among the employed, the median wage of low-, middle- and high-wage workers all increased in the second quarter of 2020, followed by a gentle decline. Over the two-year period from the second quarter of 2019 to the second quarter of 2021, the median hourly wage of high-wage workers increased from $50.59 to $52.68 and the median for low-wage workers increased from $10.79 to $11.70. Overall, wages for the three earning tiers of employed workers are slightly higher in 2021 than in 2019.

A line graph showing that the pandemic affected wages similarly across earning tiers except for a sharp, but temporary, impact on low-wage workers from the rise in unemployment

Including the unemployed in the sample has a dramatic effect on the median earnings of low-wage workers, but relatively briefly. The median hourly wage of these workers fell from $10.52 in the second quarter of 2019 to $0.00 in the second quarter of 2020, followed by a rebound to $10.00 in the second quarter of 2021. As the U.S. unemployment rate reached near 13% in the second quarter of 2020, the unemployed – with zero earnings – comprised a majority of low-wage workers. Thus, the median wage of this group plunged to zero amid the recession, but then increased with the restoration of jobs.

A line graph showing that including the unemployed, inequality spiked in the COVID-19 recession but is back to pre-pandemic levels

With the impact on the median earnings of low-wage workers being of limited duration, the pandemic also does not seem to have left a lasting imprint on income inequality. In 2019, the median earnings of low-wage workers were about 20% of the median earnings of high-wage workers. Among employed workers, this ratio budged little through the recession and in the period since, with low-wage workers earning 22% as much as high-wage workers in the second quarter of 2021.

Including the unemployed shows the potential for a widening of income inequality at the start of the pandemic. In the second quarter of 2020, low-wage workers earned nothing (0%) at the median compared with high-wage workers – or any other group, for that matter. But the wage ratio increased to 16% by the third quarter of 2020 and had ascended to 19% by the second quarter of 2021, comparable to the levels in 2019.

Overall, what happened to wage inequality during the COVID-19 recession depends to a large degree on what truly happened to the financial resources of unemployed workers. If the loss in wages was replaced by unemployment insurance, supplemental relief under the CARES Act, or by other means, there may have been no change in income inequality. But inequality may yet widen in the near future. Some 39% of the unemployed had been without work for six months or longer in July 2021. Evidence shows that these workers are likely to experience a loss in earnings as they find new jobs. Meanwhile, there is no guarantee of financial relief from the government beyond September.

Inequality also manifests itself in the form of wage gaps between men and women and across racial and ethnic groups. Although unemployment initially increased more among women – to 14.1% in the second quarter of 2020 compared with 12.1% among men – it has fallen more quickly since, according to government estimates. The difference in the unemployment rate for women (5.7%) and men (6.1%) in the second quarter of 2021 is relatively small, as was the case before the pandemic. Likewise, there was virtually no movement in the gender wage gap, with employed women earning 83.3% as much as employed men at the median in the second quarter of 2021, about the same as in 2019. Indeed, the gender wage gap has held steady at this level since about 2005.

A bar chart showing that wage gaps between women and men and White, Black and Hispanic workers changed little in the pandemic

The earnings of employed Black and Hispanic workers relative to the earnings of employed White workers have also changed little during the pandemic. In the second quarter of 2021, Black workers earned 74.9% as much as White workers at the median, compared with 76.3% in the second quarter of 2019. For Hispanic workers, this ratio edged up from 69.8% to 72.8% over the same period.

The most notable change was among Asian American workers, who have historically earned more at the median than other racial and ethnic groups. In the second quarter of 2019, employed Asian workers earned 115.1% as much as employed White workers. This ratio jumped to 130.0% in the second quarter of 2020 and has since remained at about that level.

But the changes in relative earnings, especially for Asian workers, need to be viewed with caution. In the second quarter of 2021, the unemployment rate among U.S. Asian workers was 5.6%, more than double its level of 2.3% in the second quarter of 2019. The proportional increase in the unemployment rate – or in the number unemployed – for other racial and ethnic groups has been much less. This suggests that the composition of employed Asian workers may still lean more towards higher-wage workers than the composition of other employed workers.

Moreover, the median wage of Asian workers may be affected more than the median for other workers by the shift in who is employed. That is because the income ladder among Asian Americans is the steepest, with wide gaps in income among origin groups and more income inequality than among other groups. Since job losses by lower-wage workers essentially push the median wage up the earnings ladder, the group with the steepest ladder – Asian workers – is likely to have seen the biggest increase.

If the unemployed are included in the analysis, the estimated increase in the earnings of Asian workers relative to the earnings of White workers from 2019 to 2021 is cut in half. Instead of increasing by 14 percentage points – from 115.1 in 2019 to 129.0 in 2021 – the increase with unemployed workers included is 7 points. But including the unemployed has no effect on the estimated change in the earnings of Black and Hispanic workers relative to the earnings of White workers.

(PEW)

SEPTEMBER 7, 2021

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/09/07/despite-the-pandemic-wage-growth-held-firm-for-most-u-s-workers-with-little-effect-on-inequality/

 

707-43-16/Polls

62% Of Adults With A Disability Say They Own A Desktop Or Laptop Computer

More than 40 million people in the United States have a disability, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. But even as majorities of these Americans report having certain technologies, the digital divide between those who have a disability and those who do not remains for some devices.

A chart showing that Americans with a disability are less likely than those without one to have a traditional computer or smartphone

Some 62% of adults with a disability say they own a desktop or laptop computer, compared with 81% of those without a disability, according to a Pew Research Center survey of U.S. adults conducted Jan. 25-Feb. 8, 2021. And when it comes to smartphone ownership, there is a gap of 16 percentage points between those with a disability and those without one (72% vs. 88%).

Despite these gaps, similar shares of Americans – regardless of disability status – say they have broadband at home or a tablet computer. For example, 72% of adults with a disability report having high-speed internet at home, a figure that does not differ statistically from the 78% of adults without a disability who say the same. And there is no statistically significant difference in tablet ownership between adults who report having a disability (47%) and those who do not have a disability (54%).

There is, however, variation by disability status when considering ownership of all these devices that enable people to go online. Roughly a quarter of Americans with disabilities (26%) say they have high-speed internet at home, a smartphone, a desktop or laptop computer and a tablet, compared with 44% of those who report not having a disability.

A bar chart showing that Americans with a disability are more likely than those without disabilities to say they never go online

Whether or not someone goes online also varies by disability status. Americans with disabilities are three times as likely as those without a disability to say they never go online (15% vs. 5%). And while three-quarters of Americans with disabilities report using the internet on a daily basis, this share rises to 87% among those who do not have a disability.

Overall, roughly one-in-five U.S. adults (18%) report that they have a disability, according to this survey, which asked respondents if any “disability, handicap, or chronic disease keeps you from participating fully in work, school, housework, or other activities, or not.” (It is important to note that there are various forms of disabilities, often differing in severity, and a range of ways to measure disability in public opinion surveys.)

Older Americans are more likely than younger adults to report having a disability. At the same time, these older age groups generally have lower levels of digital adoption than the nation as a whole.

There are tools on the market aimed at making the digital experience more accessible to Americans with disabilities. For example, a new search engine is in the works to help those with disabilities find websites that are accessible to them. And social media companies have experimented with artificial intelligence to help the visually impaired use their platforms, while other companies are expanding their screen-reading software and mobile apps. At the same time, there have been many lawsuits over the years claiming some websites are not accessible to those with disabilities.

(PEW)

SEPTEMBER 10, 2021

Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/09/10/americans-with-disabilities-less-likely-than-those-without-to-own-some-digital-devices/

 

707-43-17/Polls

46% Of Canadians Who Say They Are Going To Support A Party On Election Day Are Absolutely Certain Of Their Vote Choice

According to a new Ipsos poll conducted on behalf of Global News, only 46% of Canadians who say they are going to support a party on election day are absolutely certain of their vote choice, leaving the remaining voters less sure (39% fairly certain; 11% not very certain; 4% not at all certain). Conservative voters (49%, +3 since the start of the campaign) and Liberal voters (49%, +1) are most likely to be absolutely certain of their choice, with NDP (43%, +6), Bloc (43%, +13) and Green Party (26%, +13) supporters less certain of their choice.

The NDP appears to have the most room to grow their vote between now and September 20th. Among those voters who express a first-choice party, 22% say they’d choose to vote for the NDP as their second choice. This contrasts with the Liberals (15%), Conservatives (11%), Greens (11%), PPC (7%), Bloc (3%) or some other party (3%) as preferred second choices. Three in ten (28%) voters don’t know who they would choose second, led by Conservative voters, 37% of whom wouldn’t identify a preferred second choice. This suggests that Conservative voters are least likely to be considering a second party.

Two thirds (67%) of Canadians say they are completely certain they will vote in this election. Looking at this intention by party support reveals no clear turnout advantage for any party: NDP (69%), Conservative (68%) and Liberal (67%) voters are equally likely to say that they are certain to vote on or before E-Day. Bloc (63%) and Green (44%) voters are less enthusiastic about voting.

The campaign has clearly had an impact on who Canadians are considering voting for. Reflecting their positive momentum in the horserace figures since the start of the campaign, the Conservatives and NDP have increased their appeal among a greater number of voters than the other parties. Conversely, vote consideration for the Liberals, Bloc and Green Party has been decidedly negative. The chart below shows the proportion of Canadians who say they have become more or less likely to vote for each party since the start of the campaign, with the change in consideration since last week in brackets.

Consider voting for…

% more likely

% no change

% less likely

Conservatives

25% (+5)

43% (-5)

32% (--)

Liberals

17% (-1)

45% (-2)

38% (+2)

NDP

24% (+4)

50% (-5)

26% (+1)

Bloc (in Quebec)

18% (-3)

44% (--)

38% (+3)

Green Party

8% (+1)

56% (-1)

36% (--)

People’s Party

5% (-2)

55% (+1)

40% (+1)

Some other party

3% (--)

59% (--)

38% (--)

Canadians acknowledge the broader trend that Ipsos has been measuring in its recent polls: one in three (34%) believe the Conservatives have been gaining the most popularity and momentum over the coming weeks (up 10 points since last week), while one in four (24%, +7) say it is the NDP who has been gaining the most strength. Just 17% (-5) believe that it is the Liberals who are on a roll. In fact, even Liberal voters believe they’re stalling, as just 39% believe they are the party with the most momentum, far behind the proportion of Conservative (72%) and NDP (67%) voters who say their own party is gaining the greatest traction in the campaign.

Despite this momentum, Canadians still believe the Liberals are the favorite to win the election, although those odds are less certain than before. Four in ten (38%) Canadians believe the Liberals will win (down 6 points since the start of the campaign), while 22% believe the Tories will win the election (up 7 points). Fewer believe that the NDP (7%, +1), Green (2%, +1), Bloc (1%, -1) or others (1%, +1) are most likely to win. Three in ten (30%, -1) Canadians say they don’t know who is going to win, rising to 76% among those who haven’t yet decided who they’re going to vote for.

An Examination of Second Choices

To foreshadow how the vote might evolve in the coming weeks of the campaign, we examine where vote switchers say they might go and from which party they are coming.

Overall, the NDP (22%) is the preferred second choice of a plurality of Canadians, followed by the Liberals (15%), Conservatives (11%), Greens (11%), PPC (7%), Bloc (3%), and others (3%).

  • Among Conservative voters, their second choice is relatively evenly divided among the NDP (18%), Liberals (12%), PPC (12%) and Greens (10%), with the Bloc (6%) and others (5%) a little behind. Four in ten (37%) Tory voters don’t know where they would move their vote if they couldn’t vote for the Conservatives.
  • Among Liberal voters, the strongly preferred second choice is the NDP (46%), with fewer votes likely to bleed to the Conservatives (17%), Greens (8%), PPC (2%), Bloc (2%) or others (2%). One in four (23%) are unsure of their second choice.
  • Among NDP voters, the Liberals (39%) are their preferred second choice followed by the Greens (18%), Conservatives (12%), PPC (3%), Bloc (2%), or others (2%). One quarter (24%) are unsure of who their second choice would be.
  • Among Bloc voters within Quebec, the Conservatives (23%) have a narrow edge as the second-choice party, but the Liberals (20%) aren’t far behind. Other parties, including the Greens (14%), NDP (10%), and others (2%) are further back. Three in ten (30%) Bloc voters are unsure of who they would pick second.

In summary, NDP support has the most room to grow (or shrink!), and most of the potential movement appears to oscillate among the progressive parties, meaning that the biggest potential for voters moving is Liberals moving to the NDP or vice versa. While the Conservatives have the least amount of room to grow, there is an important opportunity for them with soft Bloc voters considering the Tories as their second choice. Conservative growth in Quebec, at the expense of the Bloc, is a real possibility, upping the stakes for O’Toole in the upcoming French-language debates. Moreover, if the Tories lose votes, they don’t look to be concentrated with a single opponent.

(Ipsos Canada)

6 September 2021

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/canadians-remain-open-to-changing-their-vote-as-debates-loom

 

707-43-18/Polls

One In Eight (13%) Canadians Is Completely Undecided On How To Vote

Toronto, ON, September 9, 2021 — Over the course of the election campaign, Ipsos polling has revealed that one in eight (13%) Canadians is completely undecided on how they will vote in this federal election. A closer examination of this key group of voters reveals who they are, how they feel and what is important to them when considering how to cast their ballot.

Who Are They?

The following reflects the demographic composition of undecided voters:

  • Two in three (67%) are women; one in three (33%) are men.
  • Four in ten (36%) are between the ages of 35 and 54 years; 30% are between the ages of 18 and 34 years; One in three (34%) are aged 55+ years.
  • One in four (26%) have children in the household; three quarters (74%) do not.

Undecided voters often end up being non-voters come election day. In a low turnout election, these voters could be among the hardest to motivate. Even in high-turnout elections, over 30% of eligible voters decided not to vote. If the debates don’t help to convince these voters one way or the other, it’s likely that many of them will simply not vote.

How Do They Feel about Justin Trudeau?

As a whole, this group is slightly less complimentary towards the Prime Minister than the general population:

  • Fewer than half (44%) approve of the performance of the Liberal government under Justin Trudeau (vs. 47% national average).
  • 35% believe that the Trudeau government has done a good job and deserves re-election (v. 39% national average).
  • Two in three (64%) say it is time for another federal party to take over (v. 61% national average).
  • Four in ten (42%) say the country is headed in the right direction (48% national average), while 57% say the country is on the wrong track (v. 50% national average).
  • Four in ten (44%) approve of the federal government’s management of the Canadian economy (v. 53% national average).

Despite being less than enthusiastic about the prime minister’s performance, they do not see a strong alternative:

  • Four in ten (41%) believe that Justin Trudeau would make the best prime minister of Canada (v. 37% national average), while fewer say the same about Jagmeet Singh (26% of undecideds v. 26% national average) or Erin O’Toole (18% of undecideds v. 27% national average).

They are significantly less likely than the general population to believe that Justin Trudeau is best described as the leader who will protect the interests of cultural, religious and other minorities (17% v. 27% national average), as someone who is best to manage during tough economic times (21% v. 30% national average), as someone whose values best represent their own (17% v. 25% national average as someone who has the best temperament and maturity to be Prime Minister (22% v. 31% national average),and as someone who gives them hope for the future (17% v. 25% national average).

What Issues are Most Important?

While healthcare (34%) and the pandemic (33%) are the two most-important issues for undecided voters in this election campaign, third on their list is affordability and the cost of living (30%), significantly higher than the 23% of the general population who cite this issue as being among their top priorities. Rounding out the top-five issues are climate change (21%) and affordability and availability of housing (21%), which once again over-indexes among this group compared to the general population (14%).

One of the main points of differentiation between the average Canadian and undecided voters is that the vast majority (78%) of undecided voters don’t know which party has the best plan or the country’s post-COVID future, believing they’re all the same. By comparison, just three in ten (30%) Canadians overall say they’re unsure of which party has the best plan for a post-COVID future.

How Do They Feel about This Election?

Undecided voters are more likely to feel apathetic towards the election than Canadians who have already made up their mind, suggesting that they might be less engaged in the campaign and therefore less likely to vote as a result.

  • Nearly half (47%) agree that they don’t really like any of the parties in this election (v. 35% national average).
  • One half (50%) believe we shouldn’t be having an election during the pandemic (v. 57% national average).
  • Only 45% feel safe going to a polling station to cast their ballot in person (vs. 67% national average).

These data suggest that undecided voters might be difficult to motivate on election day to get out and cast their ballot (or in an advance poll or mail-in ballot). If the leaders can woo these voters with their campaign promises, getting them to actually show up and cast their ballot may be a different challenge altogether.

(Ipsos Canada)

9 September 2021

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/one-in-eight-canadians-is-completely-undecided-on-how-to-vote

 

AUSTRALIA

707-43-19/Polls

The Australian Economy Grew By A Stunning 9.6% Over The Year To June 2021

Retailers have been the big winners during this period and the top four most trusted brands again comprise some of Australia’s leading retail brands led by Woolworths, Coles, Bunnings Warehouse and ALDI in fourth place.

Notably, there have been four big improvers in the June quarter 2021 with Department Stores Kmart, Myer, Big W and Target all improving their standing as some of Australia’s most trusted brands. Kmart has entered the top 5, both Myer and Big W are new entrants to the top 10 and Target jumped seven spots in the quarter to be just outside the top 10.

Roy Morgan is presenting a special webinar on the top 20 most trusted and distrusted brands on Tuesday September 14 at 11am. Register your interest in the upcoming webinar.

Roy Morgan data scientists analysed nominations from more than 20,000 Australians to identify the nation’s 20 most trusted brands, and 20 most distrusted brands.

According to Roy Morgan CEO Michele Levine, retailers have enjoyed an unexpected ‘banner year’ caused by Government responses to the pandemic, however the latest lockdowns in Sydney and Melbourne point to a challenging period ahead as Australia looks to ‘live with COVID’ for the first time:

“Australia’s big two supermarkets Woolworths and Coles have held their spots as the most trusted brands in Australia in the June quarter 2021 ahead of Bunnings Warehouse and fellow supermarket ALDI. These businesses have been essential outlets for millions of Australians over the last 18 months and the latest lockdowns in Sydney, Melbourne and Canberra will again emphasise their importance to many.

“The other big winners during the June quarter 2021 were Department Stores including Kmart, Myer, Big W and Target. All four lifted their rankings with Myer and Big W entering the top 10 most trusted brands as many retailers enjoyed record sales as Australians prevented from travelling and enjoying live entertainment such as sport, music, theatre and the like redirected their spending into the retail industry.

“The latest lockdowns in NSW, Victoria and the ACT are set to end when vaccination rates in these states reach targets of 70% and then 80% of the adult population fully vaccinated. This is a big difference from prior lockdowns as Australians will be ‘living with COVID’ for the first time when these lockdowns end.

“This new ‘COVID-normal’ will provide a challenging environment for retailers that rely heavily on personal interactions between staff and customers. The big question facing retailers is how they manage the questions of ‘vaccination mandates’ for staff and ‘vaccination passports’ for customers without destroying the trust they’ve built up over the past year.

“These questions are front and centre for many businesses approaching a post-pandemic ‘COVID-normal’ but retailers in particular will face the ‘sharp edge’ of these issues with the high level of interactions between staff and customers they deal with every day of the week.” said Levine.

Just outside the top 10 there are several other brands to improve their rankings during the June quarter 2021 including Samsung (11th), IGA (12th), Target (13th), Australia Post (15th), Bendigo Bank (17th) and JB Hi-Fi (20th) which is a new entrant as one of Australia’s top 20 most trusted brands.

The Roy Morgan analysis also reveals the top 20 list of Australia’s most distrusted brands with Harvey Norman entering the top 20 list for the first time while brands including Amazon, Google, Twitter and Crown Resorts all experienced rising distrust rankings during the June quarter 2021.

Ms. Levine notes the big ‘loser’ in the latest Roy Morgan Risk Report is Harvey Norman: “Furniture and electrical retailer Harvey Norman’s entry into the list of Australia’s top 20 most distrusted brands illustrates again the brand damage than can accrue to a business that is perceived to not be looking after the interests of its customers and the wider community.

“Harvey Norman has been widely criticised this year for vowing to keep the $22 million in JobKeeper wage subsidies it received as part of the Government’s economic support despite recording a record profit before tax of $1.18 billion for the year ended June 30, 2021 – an increase of $521 million from a year ago.

“It appears the pressure on the company has had an impact though with the company just this week deciding to repay $6 million of JobKeeper wage subsidies – but will this concession prove too little too late for Harvey Norman to rebuild the trust they have lost during this period?”

The top 10 most trusted brands in Australia – June 2021 (March 2021 in brackets)

https://www.roymorgan.com/~/media/files/morgan%20poll/2020s/2021/september/8784-c1.png?h=703&w=851&la=en

Source: Roy Morgan Single Source (Australia). Risk Monitor, July 2020 – June 2021. Key commercial brands with 20+ mentions. Base: Australians 14+; n=21,724.

(Roy Morgan)

September 07 2021

Source: https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/8784-risk-monitor-trust-distrust-september-2021-202109030606

 

 

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES

707-43-20/Polls

4 Out Of 10 Brazilians Want To Go Back To Working Outside The Home At The End Of The Pandemic

The new coronavirus pandemic, which had as one of its main consequences the need for social distance, caused new configurations to be created in the work environment. Although the term home-office – which refers to working at home – has been disseminated in the last 18 months, in Brazil, the prevailing desire is to return to offices and other corporate spaces that are disconnected from the domestic environment.

The Return to the Workplace 2021 Global Survey, carried out by Ipsos in 29 nations – including Brazil – showed that 40% of respondents in the country want to work outside their homes in the post-pandemic period. A slightly smaller percentage, 31%, prefer to work more or completely at home-office. 9% prefer to work from home as much as they used to do before the health crisis, 10% did not know how to answer and 11% said that the nature of their work does not allow them to choose where to work. On the global average, the percentage of people who want to work outside the home is 33%.

“The research shows that a review of the work model in Brazil is absolutely imperative. We present similar numbers on both extremes of preferences: there is a certain balance between people who want to stay at home and those who want to go back to the office. Companies will have to deal with a complex scenario and think of a model that respects the individual peculiarities of each of their employees”, analyzes Marcos Calliari, CEO of Ipsos in Brazil.

In Brazil, 14% of respondents say they worked from their homes before the Covid-19 crisis. In the pandemic, the number grew to 26%. In the world, there were 13% working at home-office, and currently there are 25%.

Among the factors that may explain the reasons why Brazilian respondents want to return to face-to-face work, 58% say they miss their co-workers – against 52% on the global average –, 41% do not feel engaged when working from home – a number slightly higher than the global average of 37% – 38% claim that the home environment hinders productivity – exactly the same portion as globally – and 35% feel more exhausted when working on a home-office basis, in line with the global average of 33%.

“In the case of Brazilians, the issue around socialization and contact with people is a cultural aspect that plays a very important role. This integration is also desired by employers, since engagement with the company happens a lot based on engagement between employees. Clearly there is a massive perception that there are losses if the worker is not in person. That's why many companies that prematurely declared that they would never return to the office are reviewing their position”, says Calliari.
The return to offices

For 27% of respondents by Ipsos in Brazil, it should still take from 6 months to a year to return to face-to-face work. Only 17% think it will take less than 6 months, 15% believe it will take more than a year and 19% have no idea. Furthermore, 22% believe that, as far as the professional aspect is concerned, things will never go back to the way they were before the Covid-19 pandemic.

In the possibility of a hybrid return, where employees work outside their homes a few times a week, 7% think that the ideal would be to work from home 4 days a week, 18% would like to stay at home 3 times a week, 15% would work in home-office 2 days a week and 10% would like to work from their homes only once a week. In addition, 30% said they preferred to work from their homes 5 days a week and 20% would not like to work at home any day of the week.

The online survey was conducted with 12,445 respondents from 29 countries, 1000 of which were Brazilian, between May 21 and June 4, 2021. The margin of error for Brazil is 3.5 percentage points.

(Ipsos Brazil)

8 September 2021

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/pt-br/4-em-cada-10-brasileiros-querem-voltar-trabalhar-fora-de-casa-ao-fim-da-pandemia

 

707-43-21/Polls

Most Adults Vaccinated Against Covid-19 In All 13 Countries Surveyed Intend To Get A Booster Shot

A new 13-country Ipsos survey conducted in partnership with the World Economic Forum finds large majorities of adults fully vaccinated against COVID-19 saying they would get a booster shot if it were available to them. Booster uptake intent ranges from 62% in Russia to 96% in Brazil. It is higher among those aged 55 and older in many countries.

In all but one of the 13 countries, most citizens surveyed expect vaccine booster shots to be required at least annually to maintain protection against COVID-19. However, majorities of adults in every country agree that the priority for vaccines should be first doses for those who want them before making booster shots available.

The survey was conducted August 26-30, 2021 on Ipsos’ Global Advisor online platform among 9,521 adults under the age of 75, including 5,977 who have already received two doses of a COVID-19.

Detailed Findings

High levels of booster uptake intent levels among fully vaccinated adults in all 13 countries

In each of the 13 countries surveyed, a large majority of adults who have received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine strongly or somewhat agree they would get a booster shot if it were available today:

  • 90%+ in Brazil (96%), Mexico (93%), and China (90%);
  • 80%+ in Australia (82%), the United Kingdom (82%), and the United States (81%);
  • 70%+ in Canada (77%), Spain (73%), Japan (72%), France (70%), and Germany (70%); and
  • 60%+ in Italy (66%) and Russia (62%).

While it varies widely across countries, COVID-19 booster uptake intent among the fully vaccinated does not differ significantly within any of the 13 countries along gender lines. However, it is notably higher among those aged 55-74 than it is among younger adults in Canada, France, Germany, and the U.K.

In every country except Russia, fully vaccinated adults are more likely to disagree than to agree with the suggestion that, once the rates of COVID-19 are low and their country has returned to pre-COVID life, there will be no reason to get another vaccine booster shot. Agreement ranges from 16% in Mexico and 17% in Australia to 37% in Italy and 51% in Russia.

In several countries, younger people are significantly more likely than their elders to agree that vaccine booster shots will not be needed when the incidence of COVID-19 has receded, and life has returned to normal. This pattern is very clear in Australia, Germany, Russia, the U.K., and the U.S. Also, in Spain and the U.S., men are more likely to share this view than are women.

Widespread expectation that booster shots will be needed at least annually

Majorities of citizens surveyed in 12 of the 13 countries strongly or somewhat agree that vaccine booster shots will be required at least every year to maintain protection against COVID-19. The expectation that booster shots will be needed annually or more often is highest in Mexico (85%), Brazil (83%), and the U.K. (77%), and lowest in Russia (43%).

Agreement that vaccine booster shots will be needed at least every year increases with age. In France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, and the U.K., it is at least 10 percentage points higher among those aged 55-74 than it is both among those under age 35 and those aged 35-54. While it is significantly more prevalent among females than it is among males in Brazil, Mexico, and the U.K., the opposite is true in Germany.

Getting first doses remains a priority over booster shots

Despite high levels of booster shot uptake intent, majorities of adults in all 13 countries (from 83% in China and Japan to 56% in France) agree that the priority for vaccines should be to give first doses to those who want them before making booster shots available. No more than one-quarter in any of the 13 countries – and as few as only one in ten in some of them – disagree.

While agreement with making first doses of COVID-19 vaccines a priority over making booster shots available varies in intensity from one country to the other, it tends to be very consistent across age groups and gender lines within each country. France and the U.S., where agreement is higher among males than it is among females, are the only exceptions.

The survey was conducted by Ipsos on its Global Advisor online platform, August 26-30, 2021, among adults 18-74 years of age in Canada and the United States, and 16-74 in Australia, Brazil, China (mainland), France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Spain, and the United Kingdom.

(Ipsos Canada)

10 September 2021

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/news-polls/global-attitudes-covid-19-vaccine-booster-shots