| 
   BUSINESS & POLITICS IN THE WORLD GLOBAL OPINION REPORT NO. 735 Week:
  March 21 – March 27, 2022 Presentation:
  April 01, 2022 731-43-23/Commentary:
  Two Years Of Life Under Lockdown - How Has The UK And People's Lives Changed Urban
  Indians Are Worried About The Impact Of Russia- Ukraine Crisis On Their
  Personal Lives Most
  Feel Positively About The Easing Of Covid-19 Curbs In Singapore, But One In
  Three Are Concerned Around
  Two-Thirds (65%) Of Malaysians Have Shopping Plans For Ramadan This Year Community
  Concern About Catching Coronavirus Seriously Decreases From 74% To 41% Kenyans
  See Government Failing On Their Top Priorities – The Economy And Corruption Just
  31% Of Britons Think The Government Is Doing The Right Amount To Help
  Ukrainians Come To The UK How
  Should Journalists Report Racially Offensive Language Two
  Years Of Life Under Lockdown - How Has The UK And People's Lives Changed The
  Passion Of The French For Video Games Is Undeniable Every
  Fifth Person In Germany Has Felt Racially Discriminated Against Biden's
  Job Approval Is 42%, Statistically Unchanged From 41% Last Month 71%
  Of Republican Voters Say Their Vote For Congress Is Against Biden After
  A Month Of War, Ukrainian Refugee Crisis Ranks Among The World’s Worst In
  Recent History About
  Two-Thirds Of U S Adults (65%) Say Science Has Had A Mostly Positive Effect
  On Society Australians
  To Spend Billions On Holidays, Food And Chocolate This Easter U S
  Image Improves Across Most Of NATO, A Survey Of 27 NATO Countries What
  MENA Citizens Think About The Environment, Among 12 Countries Surveyed Are
  Europeans In Favor Of Ukraine Joining The EU, A Study In 4 Countries An
  Average Of 30% People Believe Most People Can Be Trusted In 30 Countries Is
  Mother’s Day A ‘Proper’ Special Occasion, Or Is It Too Commercialized, A
  Survey In 18 Countries INTRODUCTORY NOTE 
	735-43-24/Commentary:
  Two
  Years Of Life Under Lockdown - How Has The UK And People's Lives Changed
  New research
  by Ipsos and the Policy
  Institute at King’s College London finds that
  3 in 10 UK adults (31%) say they are feeling lonelier now than before the
  pandemic (58% report no change). Alongside this, nearly half think they see
  friends and family less (46%) and leave the house less (45%) than before the
  pandemic began.  Four in ten 16-34 year olds (39%) say they feel more
  lonely than before the pandemic started about two years ago. The new study,
  the latest in a series that has tracked opinion since April 2020, does find
  though that across many of these aspects of people’s lives, a large
  proportion (usually slightly more or less than half) say there has been no
  change now compared with before the pandemic.  Participants were also
  asked to report all changes – whether or not they felt they had been caused
  by the pandemic. A third of
  Brits believe that their physical (32%) and mental (33%) health has got worse
  (half in each case say it is about the same). The youngest (16-34) are most
  likely to feel that their mental health has deteriorated during the pandemic,
  with 42% saying it had, though one in four (23%) said that it had
  improved.  Women are also more likely than men to feel their mental health
  is now worse (by 38% to 28%). About a
  third (36%) think they have put on weight compared with before the pandemic –
  although almost as many (30%) say they are exercising more. 50% of
  Britons say they are spending more time looking at screens than before the
  pandemic. And just over two in five of those aged 16-75 (46%) say they check
  social media at least once a day for news about the pandemic including 7%
  saying they check hourly (though this is down from 56% checking social media
  daily for information about the coronavirus at the start of the first
  lockdown in April 2020).  Overall, a quarter (27%) say their ability to
  concentrate is worse than before the pandemic (58% say no change), rising to
  38% of younger people (though 24% of 16-34s also say this has improved). When it
  comes to sleep, overall around a third (32%) say the overall quality of their
  sleep has got worse (53% no change).  The most common changes in
  people’s sleeping patterns are more disturbed sleep (25%) or sleeping fewer
  hours (20%). The state of the pandemic 
 Government handling of the pandemic The public
  are more positive about the UK government’s handling of the pandemic now than
  at earlier points in the pandemic. 54% of those aged 16-75 believe that the
  UK government’s response to the pandemic has been confused and inconsistent,
  but that has declined since 2020 and particularly fallen since the second
  lockdown in November 2020 when two-thirds (68%) said that was the case. On the other
  hand 38% believe that the government has responded well to changing
  scientific advice (up from 27% in November 2020), while 28% say they have
  not. And when comparing our government to others, 42% of 16-75 year-olds say
  the UK government has responded well to the pandemic compared to other
  countries (up from 28% in July 2020), with 27% disagreeing. On balance,
  UK adults think that advice from scientists and experts has been good during
  the pandemic and that government has used it effectively. Only one in five
  (21%) believe that scientists and medical experts have given the government
  poor advice during the pandemic while 46% disagree. Four in ten (43%) believe
  that the UK government has made good use of that advice while 28% do not. Perceptions of the NHS A majority
  believe that a range of the NHS services have got worse since before the
  pandemic began, but they also tend to think that this is at least partly
  because of the pandemic. Britons
  believe that the following services have got worse since before the pandemic
  began: 
 But amongst
  those who think things have got worse, half or more tend to believe that this
  is at least mostly because of the pandemic rather than other reasons: 
 Gideon Skinner, Research Director at Ipsos said: These findings, marking the two-year anniversary of the first
  national lockdown, are further evidence of how over that time life in the UK
  has changed for many people, affecting a range of aspects of our physical and
  mental health.  Although we shouldn’t overestimate this (more people
  think there has been no impact, and some of these changes may have happened
  naturally without the pandemic), it is notable that it is often younger
  generations who feel harder hit.  This all suggests that most Britons
  are right to feel that the after-effects of the coronavirus are not over yet. Professor Bobby Duffy, director of the Policy Institute at King’s
  College London, said: The effects of the pandemic and the measures to control it are still
  keenly felt by significant proportions of the UK population – with a third of
  us saying we’re lonelier and sleeping less well, nearly half of us seeing our
  friends less and leaving home less, and half spending more time on our screens.
  It’s no surprise then that a third of us feel our mental or physical health
  is worse. And, as with so much in the pandemic, some groups are feeling the
  effects more, with the young and women more likely to experience many of
  these negative impacts. We’re also deeply worried about the impact on the
  NHS, particularly waiting times and how the pandemic has affected the
  wellbeing of NHS staff. (Ipsos MORI) 23 March
  2022 Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/two-years-of-life-under-lockdown-how-has-uk-and-peoples-lives-changed SUMMARY
  OF POLLS
  ASIA (India) Urban
  Indians Are Worried About The Impact Of Russia- Ukraine Crisis On Their
  Personal Lives As the Russia-Ukraine crisis intensified,
  YouGov’s latest data shows that nearly two-thirds of urban Indians (64%) feel
  the ongoing crisis may have an impact on India’s economy leading to an
  increase in fuel prices. Just about the same number (63%) think it will
  increase the price of essential commodities. These issues are more concerning
  to Gen X (70% for fuel prices and 61% for the cost of commodities) than their
  younger counterparts. (YouGov India) March 22, 2022 (Singapore) Most
  Feel Positively About The Easing Of Covid-19 Curbs In Singapore, But One In
  Three Are Concerned Following yesterday’s announcement on
  the easing of community safe management
  measures in Singapore,
  latest data from YouGov Omnibus reveals that residents are most
  anticipative of resuming larger-scale social gatherings, with seven in ten
  (75%) looking forward to the increase in group sizes from five to ten persons
  – a cap that has been in place since end-2021. In particular, those above the
  age of 55 are significantly more likely to say they are looking forward to
  the increased group sizes, with eight in ten expressing anticipation (81%). (YouGov Singapore) (Malaysia) Around
  Two-Thirds (65%) Of Malaysians Have Shopping Plans For Ramadan This Year Latest research from YouGov RealTime Omnibus shows that around two-thirds (65%) of
  Malaysians have shopping plans for Ramadan this year. Segmenting by region
  reveals that Malaysians residing in the peninsula’s east coast (Pahang,
  Terengganu, Kelantan) are more likely to have Ramadan shopping plans (77%),
  compared to Malaysians residing in other regions. Across both genders,
  clothes and apparel (male 75% vs female 81%) is the most popular category. Among
  men, household items (52%) took second place, ahead of footwear (42%), with
  electronics (32%) and furniture (31%) rounding out the top five.  (YouGov Malaysia) March 25, 2022 (Turkey) Community
  Concern About Catching Coronavirus Seriously Decreases From 74% To 41% Although half of the society thinks that
  they will catch this virus, they are less worried about it now. According to
  the research of Ipsos, 74% of individuals in the first month of the epidemic
  stated that they were very worried about themselves or a member of their
  family catching the corona virus, while the rate of individuals who are very
  worried has decreased to 41% today. While 56% of the society thought that
  they would catch the epidemic in the first years of the epidemic, this rate
  decreased by 10 points to 46% in the first year of the epidemic, and half of
  the society thinks that they will catch this virus today. (Ipsos Turkey) 21 March 2022 AFRICA (Kenya) Kenyans
  See Government Failing On Their Top Priorities – The Economy And Corruption Management of economy tops the list of
  important problems that Kenyans want their government to address, followed by
  corruption, health, unemployment, and crime/security. Management of the
  economy climbed from sixth place on citizens’ priority list in 2014-2019 to
  the No. 1 spot in 2021. Corruption has ranked as one of the top two
  priorities for the past six years. (Afrobarometer) 25 March 2022 More Than Three-Fourths (78%) Of Kenyans
  Support Regular, Open, And Honest Elections As The Best Way To Choose Leaders More than three-fourths of Kenyans support
  regular, open, and honest elections as the best way to choose leaders, the
  most recent Afrobarometer survey shows. And most citizens favour the
  existence of many political parties to ensure that voters have real choices
  in electing their leaders. More than three-fourths (78%) of Kenyans support
  regular, open, and honest elections as the best way to choose leaders. (Afrobarometer) 25 March 2022 WEST
  EUROPE (UK) Just
  31% Of Britons Think The Government Is Doing The Right Amount To Help
  Ukrainians Come To The UK New YouGov research shows Britons remain
  broadly of the opinion the government is not doing enough to help those
  trying to reach the UK from Ukraine, although opinion has shifted in recent
  days. Two-fifths of Britons (43%) now think the government is not doing
  enough to enable refugees from Ukraine to come to the UK. However, this is
  down 14 points since 8-9 March, with this previous survey conducted before
  the Homes for Ukraine scheme announcement. The proportion of those thinking
  the government is doing about the right amount to help Ukrainians come to the
  UK is up 12 points, from 19% to 31%. (YouGov UK) March 24, 2022 How Should Journalists Report Racially
  Offensive Language New YouGov research among ethnic minority
  Britons looks at how people think racial slurs should be quoted in written
  and broadcast news media. While all broadcast outlets will have differing
  editorial guidelines, ethnic minority Britons tend to think slurs should be
  quoted as a euphemism, using such phrases as "the N-word" or
  “P-word” (28%) in TV and radio news. At the other end of the scale, 20% think
  television and radio reporters should use the language in full, without any
  sort of censorship or alteration. (YouGov UK) March 21, 2022 Two Years Of Life Under Lockdown - How Has
  The UK And People's Lives Changed New research by Ipsos and the Policy Institute at King’s College London finds that 3
  in 10 UK adults (31%) say they are feeling lonelier now than before the
  pandemic (58% report no change). Alongside this, nearly half think they see
  friends and family less (46%) and leave the house less (45%) than before the
  pandemic began.  Four in ten 16-34 year olds (39%) say they feel more
  lonely than before the pandemic started about two years ago. (Ipsos MORI) 23 March 2022 (France) The Passion Of The French For Video Games Is Undeniable The console ecosystem (Hardware, Software
  and Accessories), which represents 49% of the total value of the video game
  market, generates 2.749 billion euros (+1%) and achieves its second historic
  performance; the previous record was set at 3.03 billion euros in 2008. The
  PC Gaming ecosystem (Hardware, Software and Accessories), which represents
  26% of the total value of the video game market, reached a new record with
  1.492 billion euros and growth of +5% in one year. (Ipsos France) March 24, 2022 (Germany) Every
  Fifth Person In Germany Has Felt Racially Discriminated Against Today, March 21st, is the annual
  International Day Against Racism. Racism is not only a much-discussed,
  socially relevant topic in Germany. 19 percent of all respondents in
  Germany state that they have had the feeling of being racially discriminated
  against. Among people who are exclusively German nationals, 13 percent
  say so. On the other hand, 46 percent of those surveyed in Germany who
  are not of German nationality say so. (YouGov Germany) March 21, 2022 NORTH AMERICA (USA) More Houses Of Worship Are Returning To Normal Operations,
  But In-Person Attendance Is Unchanged Since Fall Among U.S. adults who say they attend
  religious services, 43% now report that their house of worship is currently
  open and holding services the same way it did before the COVID-19 outbreak – up 14 percentage points in the last
  six months and 31 points since last March. Meanwhile, 47% say their
  congregation is open but with modifications still in place due to the
  pandemic, such as mask requirements or social distancing. (PEW) MARCH 22, 2022 Biden's Job Approval Is 42%, Statistically Unchanged From
  41% Last Month  At 42%, President Joe Biden's latest
  job approval rating marks his seventh consecutive reading below 44%, while a
  majority of Americans, 54%, continue to disapprove of the job he is doing. Although
  Biden's overall rating is flat, Americans' approval of his handling of the
  coronavirus response (53%) and the situation with Russia (42%) has each risen
  six points over the past month. At the same time, approval of his handling of
  foreign affairs (43%) and the economy (36%) is not significantly different
  than in February. (Gallup) MARCH 22, 2022 A Broad Majority Of Americans (69%) Favor The United States
  Taking Steps To Become Carbon Neutral By 2050 A broad majority of Americans (69%) favor
  the United States taking steps to become carbon neutral by 2050, according to
  a Pew Research Center survey conducted in January. But while some
  advocates suggest that nuclear power – a source that emits no carbon – should
  have a more prominent role in the nation’s energy makeup, the public
  continues to express mixed views about it as an energy source. (PEW) MARCH 23, 2022 71% Of Republican Voters Say Their Vote For Congress Is
  Against Biden Pew Research Center conducted this study to
  understand how the public views control of Congress, issues for the upcoming
  midterm elections and confidence in how the elections will be conducted. For
  this analysis, we surveyed 10,441 U.S. adults in March 2022. Everyone who
  took part in this survey is a member of the Center’s American Trends Panel
  (ATP), an online survey panel that is recruited through national, random
  sampling of residential addresses. This way nearly all U.S. adults have a
  chance of selection. The survey is weighted to be representative of the U.S.
  adult population by gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education
  and other categories.  (PEW) MARCH 24, 2022 After A Month Of War, Ukrainian Refugee Crisis Ranks Among
  The World’s Worst In Recent History Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has created
  one of the biggest refugee crises of modern times. A month into the war, more
  than 3.7 million Ukrainians have fled to neighboring countries –
  the sixth-largest refugee outflow over the past 60-plus years, according to a
  Pew Research Center analysis of United Nations data. There are now almost as
  many Ukrainian refugees as there were Afghan refugees fleeing the (first)
  Taliban regime in 2001, according to figures compiled by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). They represent about 9.1% of
  Ukraine’s pre-invasion population of about 41.1 million – ranking the current
  crisis 16th among 28 major refugee crises by share of population.   (PEW) MARCH 25, 2022 About Two-Thirds Of U S Adults (65%) Say Science Has Had A
  Mostly Positive Effect On Society About two-thirds of U.S. adults (65%) say
  science has had a mostly positive effect on society, while 28% say it has had
  an equal mix of positive and negative effects and just 7% say it has had a
  mostly negative effect, according to a recent Pew Research Center survey.
  Over the past few years, around two-thirds or more of Americans have seen
  science’s effect on society as mostly positive. (PEW) MARCH 25, 2022 AUSTRALIA Australians To Spend Billions On Holidays, Food And
  Chocolate This Easter Over four million Australians are planning
  a trip away this Easter with $7.1 billion to be spent on holidays, while
  around $1.5 billion will be splurged on food and chocolate, in a major boon
  for tourism operators and retail businesses. Of the Australians going away
  this Easter, 63% will be travelling within their own state, 34% will be going
  interstate and 3% overseas. Those aged 35-49, and the most likely to have a
  family in tow, are set to spend an average of $2,000 on their Easter
  holidays, totalling $2.6 billion overall - more than any other age group March 25 2022 MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES U S Image Improves Across Most Of NATO, A Survey Of 27 NATO
  Countries Gallup surveys conducted before Russia
  invaded Ukraine in February 2022 showed the image of U.S. leadership was
  stronger across much of NATO than it had been in years, after languishing at
  low levels during the Trump administration. Between 2020 and 2021, U.S.
  leadership saw double-digit gains in 20 of the 27 NATO members surveyed both
  years. Lithuania was the only NATO member where approval ratings headed in a
  negative direction, with a six-percentage-point drop. But even so, the
  leadership of the U.S. earned higher approval in Lithuania last year than did
  the leadership of Russia (8%) and China (5%). (Gallup) MARCH 23, 2022 Source: https://news.gallup.com/poll/391160/image-improves-across-nato.aspx What MENA Citizens Think About The Environment, Among 12
  Countries Surveyed From 28 to 31 March 2022, the inaugural
  Middle East and North Africa Climate Week 2022 in Dubai, UAE will bring
  together key stakeholders to take the pulse of climate action in the region,
  explore climate challenges and opportunities to build forward from the
  pandemic and showcase ambitious solutions. Arab Barometer’s 2018-2019
  wave of surveys found that citizens across MENA overwhelmingly regard water
  pollution and trash as grave environmental concerns, while relatively fewer
  citizens worry about air pollution and climate change.  (Arabbarometer) March 24, 2022 Are Europeans In Favor Of Ukraine Joining The EU, A Study
  In 4 Countries Regarding Ukraine joining the EU the
  Spaniards are the most in favor of Ukraine's membership: 6 people out of 10
  (60%) want the country to join the Union. Only 14% are against it. At
  the same time, a relative majority of Germans (46%), Italians (45%) and French (42%) share this
  opinion. Conversely, 30% of the citizens of each of these countries are
  opposed to Ukraine's membership. (YouGov France) March 24, 2022 Source: https://fr.yougov.com/news/2022/03/24/les-europeens-favorables-adhesion-de-lukraine/ An Average Of 30% People Believe Most People Can Be Trusted
  In 30 Countries Ipsos’ tracking of sense of Social Cohesion
  (part of Ipsos Context Advantage Knowledge Suite) across 28 countries has
  shown that societies have been becoming less cohesive over the past couple of
  years. In Canada, only 33% of citizens believe that most people can be
  trusted, against 67% who believe that you can’t be too careful dealing with
  people, placing Canadians in the middle of the spectrum when compared to 29
  other countries. Interpersonal trust is uniformly low across Latin America
  and closer to the global average in North America. Levels vary widely across
  countries within other regions: In Europe, from 48% in the Netherlands to
  only 16% in Poland; and in the Asia-Pacific region, from 56% in China and
  India to 13% in Malaysia. (Ipsos Canada) 24 March 2022 Is Mother’s Day A ‘Proper’ Special Occasion, Or Is It Too
  Commercialized, A Survey In 18 Countries A new YouGov survey in 18 countries and
  territories shows a mixed picture regarding Mother’s Day. We asked more than
  19,000 people whether they thought Mother’s Day is celebrated more because it
  is a ‘proper’ special occasion, or if it was an occasion that people wouldn’t
  celebrate if it weren’t for pressure from commercial entities like greetings
  card companies. Belief that Mother’s Day is still being celebrated as a
  ‘proper’ special occasion is generally lower in the West, and particularly in
  Western Europe. Danes are the most cynical, with 61% saying they think that
  entities like greeting card companies are the driving force behind the
  celebration these days, compared to only 27% who disagree. (YouGov UK) March 26, 2022 ASIA
  735-43-01/Polls Urban
  Indians Are Worried About The Impact Of Russia- Ukraine Crisis On Their
  Personal Lives
  As the Russia-Ukraine crisis intensified,
  YouGov’s latest data shows that nearly two-thirds of urban Indians (64%) feel
  the ongoing crisis may have an impact on India’s economy leading to an
  increase in fuel prices. Just about the same number (63%) think it will
  increase the price of essential commodities. These issues are more concerning
  to Gen X (70% for fuel prices and 61% for the cost of commodities) than their
  younger counterparts. 
 Apart from this, half fear a third world
  war (52%) while many foresee volatility in the stock market and a surge in
  inflation rates (43% and 39%). Of those who cited an increase in fuel
  price as a concern, more than a third (36%) of respondents said they might
  consider taking public transportation instead of using their own vehicles if
  there is a further increase in the fuel price. The older generation (42% of
  GenX respondents) is more likely to take this step than millennials (33%) and
  Gen Z (36%). While some are planning to switch/buy an EV
  vehicle (11%) or start using two-wheelers instead of cars (10%), only a few
  indicated that they would halt their plans of buying a new car (7%). The conflict between the countries has
  stoked uncertainty in global trade, affecting the price of crude oil and
  other commodities. While the direct impact on India will be limited, the
  combination of supply disruptions and ongoing terms of trade shock is likely
  to weigh on the economy, resulting in a sharper rise in inflation in the
  country. When asked about this, most urban Indians
  think a rise in the inflation rate will impact their household finances and
  they will either have to reduce their discretionary expenses (49%), rely on
  their saving (18%) or take debt (9%) to cover their expenses. While residents
  of West and North India are more likely to say that they will cut back on
  their discretionary expenses, those in South India are most likely than
  others to tap their savings or take out a loan to cover their expenses. 
 Only 14% of the total respondents indicated
  that their household finances will not be impacted if the inflation rate in
  India surges. Millennials are most likely to say this compared to the rest of
  the population. When asked about their views on the crisis,
  four in five (43%) want India to maintain a neutral stand in the
  Russia-Ukraine dispute. Almost as many (38%), however, want the government to
  offer humanitarian aid and support to Ukraine. Only a few (4%) think India
  should refrain from providing any assistance. 
 While Indians have a mixed view about
  offering help, a vast majority (63%) of urban Indians support India’s
  abstention from UN General Assembly’s vote against Russian aggression.  (YouGov India) March 22, 2022 Source: https://in.yougov.com/en-hi/news/2022/03/22/urban-indians-are-worried-about-impact-russia-ukra/ 735-43-02/Polls Most Feel
  Positively About The Easing Of Covid-19 Curbs In Singapore, But One In Three
  Are Concerned
  Following yesterday’s announcement on
  the easing of community safe management
  measures in Singapore,
  latest data from YouGov Omnibus reveals that residents are most
  anticipative of resuming larger-scale social gatherings, with seven in ten
  (75%) looking forward to the increase in group sizes from five to ten persons
  – a cap that has been in place since end-2021. In particular, those above the
  age of 55 are significantly more likely to say they are looking forward to
  the increased group sizes, with eight in ten expressing anticipation (81%). The removal of the mandatory requirement to
  wear masks outdoors (63%) and reduction of quarantine rules for travel (51%)
  also come up top in the minds of people here, with full-time working adults
  most looking forward to the increased ease of travel (58%).    Notably, young adults are especially
  looking forward to the lifting of restrictions on alcohol and live
  entertainment, with half of those aged 18-24 anticipating the resumption of
  live music and screening of live broadcast programmes at F&B
  establishments (51%), and four in ten of those aged 25-34 looking forward to
  consuming alcohol beyond 10.30pm (38%). 
 As for the general sentiment toward the
  relaxation of measures, while one in four Singapore residents feel happy
  about them (38%) and a third feel relieved (31%), a further third feel
  concerned (29%). There is also some disparity in how men and
  women feel about the issue, with men significantly more likely to express
  positive sentiment of relief (35%), happiness (42%) and excitement (30%), and
  women more likely to resonate with the negative sentiment of concern (33%). 
 (YouGov Singapore) Source: https://sg.yougov.com/en-sg/news/2022/03/25/most-feel-positively-about-relaxation-covid-19-cur/ 735-43-03/Polls Around
  Two-Thirds (65%) Of Malaysians Have Shopping Plans For Ramadan This Year
  Latest research from YouGov RealTime Omnibus shows that around two-thirds (65%) of
  Malaysians have shopping plans for Ramadan this year. Segmenting by region
  reveals that Malaysians residing in the peninsula’s east coast (Pahang,
  Terengganu, Kelantan) are more likely to have Ramadan shopping plans (77%),
  compared to Malaysians residing in other regions.  
 What are Malaysians planning to buy this
  Ramadan?  Among Malaysians planning to shop this
  Ramadan, nearly four-fifths (79%) say they will buy clothes and apparel – in
  line with the tradition of donning new clothes on Hari Raya Puasa/Aidilfitri
  or Eid al-Fitr, a day after Ramadan. Almost half (49%) also intend to buy
  household items – such as washing detergent and cooking oil – and personal
  care / beauty products.  Additionally, footwear is on the Ramadan
  shopping lists of around two-fifths (42%) of Malaysians, followed by fashion
  accessories (37%) – such as hats, jewelry and bags – and furniture (30%). 
 Across both genders, clothes and apparel
  (male 75% vs female 81%) is the most popular category. Among men, household
  items (52%) took second place, ahead of footwear (42%), with electronics
  (32%) and furniture (31%) rounding out the top five.  Among women, care / beauty products (61%)
  took second place, ahead of household items (48%), with footwear (42%) and
  fashion accessories (33%) rounding out the top five. 
 (YouGov Malaysia) March 25, 2022 Source: https://my.yougov.com/en-my/news/2022/03/25/malaysia-ramadan-shopping-trends-2022/ 735-43-04/Polls Community
  Concern About Catching Coronavirus Seriously Decreases From 74% To 41%
  However, the Level of Concern About
  Catching the Coronavirus is Decreasing Significantly. Although half of the society thinks that
  they will catch this virus, they are less worried about it now. According to
  the research of Ipsos, 74% of individuals in the first month of the epidemic
  stated that they were very worried about themselves or a member of their
  family catching the corona virus, while the rate of individuals who are very
  worried has decreased to 41% today. 
 In these days when we left the 2nd year
  behind in the epidemic, 1 out of every 4 people think that they will not
  catch the coronavirus While 56% of the society thought that they
  would catch the epidemic in the first years of the epidemic, this rate
  decreased by 10 points to 46% in the first year of the epidemic, and half of
  the society thinks that they will catch this virus today. About one in four
  people think that they will not be infected with this virus since the first
  day of the epidemic. 
 Parallel to Decreasing Anxiety Level,
  Society Feels More Comfortable About the Epidemic Today In December 2020, when there was a serious
  increase in the number of cases in the epidemic, 7 out of 10 people stated
  that they have always been worried since the first day of the epidemic, while
  the number of cases is still high today, the level of anxiety of individuals
  has decreased considerably. Today, the proportion of individuals who have
  been worried since the first day of the epidemic has decreased by half and
  regressed to 32%. 55% of individuals state that while they were more worried
  at the beginning of the epidemic, they felt more comfortable in this regard
  today. 
 The number of people who are more
  optimistic about the general effects of the epidemic on our country is
  increasing. While 70% of the society thought that the
  general impact of the coronavirus epidemic on our country would be more
  negative in December 2020, when the epidemic first peaked, the number of
  people who are pessimistic has decreased to 16% today. More than 4 out of 10
  people are more optimistic about the impact of the epidemic. 
 The Number of People Who Think the Fight
  Against the Pandemic Is Going Well Is Also Increasing Until 2022, more than half of the society
  thought that the fight against the epidemic was going badly. However, today 1
  out of 3 people think that it is going bad. The rate of those who think that
  the fight against the epidemic is going well has increased from 30% to 47%. 
 The decrease in the sense of anxiety in the
  society and the serious risk perception of being in closed places are also
  decreasing in parallel with the people's feeling more comfortable. Of course, as the epidemic continues, the
  rate of people who think that it is risky to be in closed areas such as
  shopping malls, cafes / restaurants, etc. is still high. However, the
  decrease in the number of individuals who think they are particularly at risk
  is remarkable. The rate of those who thought that being in crowded
  environments was too risky at the beginning of the epidemic was 84%, but
  today it has decreased to 53%. The rate of those who think that it is too
  risky to eat in places such as cafes / restaurants is reduced by half. 
 Society Pays Less Attention to Mask
  Distance Issue Now 82% of individuals think that other
  individuals in the society do not comply with social distance today. In the
  first days, the rate of those who were of this opinion was not very low
  (67%). However, there is an opinion that everyone is more careful about
  masks. While the rate of those who think that other people do not or rarely
  wear masks in the first year of the epidemic was 20%, today this rate is 67%. 
 Sidar Gedik, CEO of Ipsos Turkey, made the
  following evaluations about the data; Last week we talked about great relief.
  The signs of this determination continue to come. The rate of those who think
  that they will not catch the epidemic is increasing, there is a 10% decrease
  in the rate of those who do not agree with this statement. The proportion of
  those who are “very worried” that they or a member of their family will get
  the disease has decreased by almost half. The rate of those who think that
  the fight against the epidemic is going well is higher than those who do not
  think so after a long time. The rate of those who said that the struggle is
  going bad has decreased from 54% in November last year to 36% now. There is a
  society that is increasingly relaxed about socialization. Being in crowded
  environments meant "serious risk" for 80% of the population a year
  ago, this rate dropped to 62% in November 2021 and to 53% last week. For one
  in three citizens, going to the mall or eating at a cafe-restaurant still
  represents a serious risk, but this rate was 70% last year and almost 50% in
  November 2021. There is also relaxation in attention to social
  distance and sensitivity to mask use. 1 year ago, there was an observation
  that 3% of the people around did not wear masks at all, now this rate has
  increased to 11%. With the warming of the weather, it seems that we will get
  out of the epidemic psychology even more, especially towards the summer. I
  hope the virus does not surprise us and the spring and summer months will be
  lived with the enthusiasm of the pre-epidemic. (Ipsos Turkey) 21 March 2022 AFRICA
  735-43-05/Polls Kenyans See
  Government Failing On Their Top Priorities – The Economy And Corruption
  Kenyans see the economy and corruption as
  the most important problems facing the country, and most say the government is
  doing a poor job on both, the latest Afrobarometer survey findings show. Management of the economy and corruption
  top the list of problems that Kenyans want the government to address, ahead of
  unemployment, health, and crime/security. But most survey respondents give the
  government a failing grade on these priority issues. As the country gears up for elections in
  August 2022, these findings suggest that the government’s ability to address economic
  problems and corruption may be a key issue for voters. Key findings ▪ Management of economy tops the list
  of important problems that Kenyans want their government to address, followed by
  corruption, health, unemployment, and crime/security (Figure 1). 
 ▪ Management of the economy climbed
  from sixth place on citizens’ priority list in 2014- 2019 to the No. 1 spot in 2021. Corruption
  has ranked as one of the top two priorities for the past six years (Table 1). 
 ▪ Very few Kenyans say the government
  is performing “fairly well” or “very well” on job creation (14%), improving living standards
  of the poor (16%), managing the economy (17%), and fighting corruption (22%)
  (Figure 2). 
 ▪ Citizens’ ratings of the
  government’s performance in addressing the economy, fighting corruption, and creating jobs have
  declined sharply over the past six years (Figure 3). 
 (Afrobarometer) 25 March 2022 735-43-06/Polls More Than
  Three-Fourths (78%) Of Kenyans Support Regular, Open, And Honest Elections As
  The Best Way To Choose Leaders
  More than three-fourths of Kenyans support
  regular, open, and honest elections as the best way to choose leaders, the most recent
  Afrobarometer survey shows. And most citizens favour the existence of
  many political parties to ensure that voters have real choices in electing their
  leaders. But fewer than half express trust in the
  Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC), the body charged with
  managing the country’s elections. As Kenyans approach the August 2022 general
  elections, these perceptions are critical as they hold the key to the realization of
  a peaceful electoral process that has eluded the country for several electoral cycles. Key findings ▪ More than three-fourths (78%) of
  Kenyans support regular, open, and honest elections as the best way to choose leaders (Figure 1). 
 o A weaker majority (56%) believe that
  elections work well in enabling voters to remove leaders who don’t do what the people
  want (Figure 2). 
 ▪ A large majority (78%) say Kenya
  needs many political parties to ensure that voters have a real choice when electing their
  leaders (Figure 3). 
 ▪ Fewer than one in four Kenyans
  (23%) say the 2017 election was “completely free and fair,” while another 31% consider it
  “free and fair with minor problems.” More than four in 10 (42%) say the election was
  either “free and fair with major problems” or “not free and fair” (Figure 4). 
 ▪ More than half of Kenyans say they
  trust the IEBC “just a little” (23%) or “not at all” (31%) (Figure 5). 
 (Afrobarometer) 25 March 2022 WEST
  EUROPE
  735-43-07/Polls Just 31% Of Britons Think The Government Is Doing The Right Amount To
  Help Ukrainians Come To The UK
  The government’s ‘Homes for Ukraine’ scheme has already been met
  with criticism as
  those willing to host Ukrainian refugees struggle with a “chaotic” visa
  system and further delays. Concerns have also been raised over a lack
  of organisation and support for those hosting refugees, while others
  are worried the scheme is open to exploitation
  by traffickers. This comes amid general disappointment with the
  government’s handling of the Ukrainian refugee crisis thus far, with many
  calling on the government to step up its efforts. New YouGov research shows Britons remain broadly of the opinion the
  government is not doing enough to help those trying to reach the UK from
  Ukraine, although opinion has shifted in recent days. Two-fifths of Britons (43%) now think the government is not doing
  enough to enable refugees from Ukraine to come to the UK. However, this is
  down 14 points since 8-9 March, with this previous survey conducted before
  the Homes for Ukraine scheme announcement. The proportion of those thinking the government is doing about the
  right amount to help Ukrainians come to the UK is up 12 points, from 19% to
  31%. 
 Six in ten Labour voters (62%) think that the government is not doing
  enough to assist Ukrainians coming to the UK, versus 18% who think they are
  doing about the right amount. Elsewhere, Conservative voters tend to think
  the government is doing the right amount (50%), although 29% want the
  government to do more. YouGov's research also shows that Britons generally want Ukrainians
  to be able to come to the UK more easily. However, this is split between 33%
  (-6 since the previous poll) who think it should be easier for all Ukrainians
  to come to the UK, and 39% (no change) who think eased restrictions should
  only apply to those with family already here. Another 13% of Britons (+2) think that no Ukrainians should get
  special treatment in seeking refugee status in the UK. Labour voters tend to favour making special provisions for all
  Ukrainians (47%) rather than just those with family here (32%). Conservative
  voters think the process should only be made easier for Ukrainians with
  familial connections in the UK (51%) rather than all of them (23%). Britain is seen as doing less to help
  Ukrainian refugees than its European allies Britain has granted visas to around 10,000 Ukrainians since the
  conflict began. Meanwhile, Poland is taking in five
  times that number of refugees per day – with over two million
  Ukrainians now believed to be sheltering there. This disparity is not lost on the public – 43% think the UK is doing
  less than other European nations to accommodate refugees. While that
  proportion is down 11pts on the previous survey, those who think the UK is
  doing about the same amount as other nations stands at only 25% (+6). One in
  ten Britons (+3) think the UK is doing more than other European countries. 
 Labour voters are clear in thinking other nations on the continent
  are doing more than us (62%) to help Ukrainians fleeing the war. Conservative
  voters are split between 35% who think the UK’s efforts are on par with its
  allies, and 32% who think we are doing less than they are. Ultimately, just one in ten Britons (+3) are proud of the
  government’s current attitude towards refugees fleeing Ukraine. Three times
  as many Britons (31%, -8) are embarrassed of the government’s efforts. A
  further 46% (+3) are neither proud nor embarrassed. Half of Labour voters (51%) say they are embarrassed by the
  government's attitude to the situation, with only 6% proud of it.
  Conservative voters are not as likely to say they are embarrassed (16%), but
  aren't proud overall either (19%), with most instead being ambivalent (59%). 
 (YouGov UK) March 24, 2022 735-43-08/Polls How Should Journalists Report Racially Offensive Language
  The BBC came under fire in 2020 after using a racial slur in full as
  part of a report into a racially-aggravated attack in Bristol. The
  victim's family supported the BBC using the word to convey the seriousness of
  the assault. However, for its efforts, the BBC earned over 18,000 direct and
  384 Ofcom complaints. Now, new YouGov research among ethnic minority Britons looks at how
  people think racial slurs should be quoted in written and broadcast news
  media. While all broadcast outlets will have differing editorial guidelines,
  ethnic minority Britons tend to think slurs should be quoted as a euphemism,
  using such phrases as "the N-word" or “P-word” (28%) in TV and
  radio news. At the other end of the scale, 20% think television and radio
  reporters should use the language in full, without any sort of censorship or
  alteration. 
 A similar number of ethnic minority Britons (18%) think racial slurs
  should be bleeped out of broadcast reports. Another 13% say such words should
  not be reported at all. Britons of Indian descent split on how broadcast news should quote
  slurs, 24% to 24% between using the word in full or a euphemism. Those from
  Pakistani backgrounds tend to think slurs should be replaced with euphemisms
  (34%), and 24% bleeped out. 
 Black Britons also tend to think euphemisms should be used to quote
  racial slurs (36%), while one in five (20%) say using the word in full is the
  right way to go and 15% would prefer it bleeped out. Another 16% think slurs
  should not be quoted at all. Comparing the attitudes of ethnic minority Britons against those of
  white Britons shows similar attitudes, with some small exceptions. A quarter
  of white Britons (25%) think these quotes should be represented with
  euphemisms, and another 24% think they should be used in full. The biggest
  difference comes among those who think these words should not be reported at
  all (18%, versus 13% of ethnic minority Britons). Should newspapers quote racially offensive
  language?  In 2015, the New York Times faced a
  similar dilemma to the BBC. In a podcast highlighting how slavery
  still casts a long shadow on life in the US, then-president Barack Obama had
  used the N-word – so should they quote it in full? Editors ultimately decided
  to print the word in their report to not detract from the president's
  message. Approaching one in four ethnic minority Britons (24%) think written
  news should report slurs using the initial letter and symbols such as dashes
  or asterisks. Another 20% think newspapers should in general not censor these words
  and report them fully, the same proportion as those who think broadcast news
  should report it in full. 
 A slightly smaller proportion (18% of ethnic minority Britons) think
  written news reports should use euphemisms like ‘the N-word’. An additional
  one in twelve (8%) think the word should be censored entirely with symbols,
  while an identical proportion think the word should not be reported at all. Black Britons are split 28% to 27% whether news outlets should use
  the first letter and symbols or a euphemism. People from Indian backgrounds
  tend to think quotes should use slurs in full (23%). However, 18% say they
  should replace it with the first letter and symbols, while 14% say euphemisms
  instead. 
 One difference between ethnic minority Britons and white Britons is
  that the latter are more likely to think newspapers should print slurs in
  full (26%, versus 20% of ethnic minority Britons). Further to this, white
  Britons are also more likely to think racial slurs should not be printed at
  all (17% versus 8%). Older ethnic minority Britons are the most
  likely to think media should quote racial slurs without censorship Among ethnic minority Britons, older generations tend to think TV and
  radio should report racially offensive language in full. Indeed, those aged
  65 and over are more than twice as likely to think TV and radio reports
  should quote racial slurs in full (35%) as those aged between 18 and 24
  (14%). As with broadcast reports, three in ten ethnic minority people aged
  65 and over (32%) think the slurs should be shown unaltered, compared to only
  9% of those aged 18 to 24. This younger age bracket splits between thinking
  they should quote them as letters and symbols (30%) or euphemisms (25%). 
 (YouGov UK) March 21, 2022 735-43-09/Polls Two Years Of Life Under Lockdown - How Has The UK And People's Lives
  Changed
  New research by Ipsos and the Policy
  Institute at King’s College London finds that 3 in 10 UK adults
  (31%) say they are feeling lonelier now than before the pandemic (58% report
  no change). Alongside this, nearly half think they see friends and family
  less (46%) and leave the house less (45%) than before the pandemic
  began.  Four in ten 16-34 year olds (39%) say they feel more lonely than
  before the pandemic started about two years ago. The new study, the latest in a series that has tracked opinion since
  April 2020, does find though that across many of these aspects of people’s
  lives, a large proportion (usually slightly more or less than half) say there
  has been no change now compared with before the pandemic.  Participants
  were also asked to report all changes – whether or not they felt they had
  been caused by the pandemic. A third of Brits believe that their physical (32%) and mental (33%)
  health has got worse (half in each case say it is about the same). The
  youngest (16-34) are most likely to feel that their mental health has
  deteriorated during the pandemic, with 42% saying it had, though one in four
  (23%) said that it had improved.  Women are also more likely than men to
  feel their mental health is now worse (by 38% to 28%). About a third (36%) think they have put on weight compared with
  before the pandemic – although almost as many (30%) say they are exercising
  more. 50% of Britons say they are spending more time looking at screens
  than before the pandemic. And just over two in five of those aged 16-75 (46%)
  say they check social media at least once a day for news about the pandemic
  including 7% saying they check hourly (though this is down from 56% checking
  social media daily for information about the coronavirus at the start of the
  first lockdown in April 2020).  Overall, a quarter (27%) say their
  ability to concentrate is worse than before the pandemic (58% say no change),
  rising to 38% of younger people (though 24% of 16-34s also say this has
  improved). When it comes to sleep, overall around a third (32%) say the overall
  quality of their sleep has got worse (53% no change).  The most common
  changes in people’s sleeping patterns are more disturbed sleep (25%) or sleeping
  fewer hours (20%). The state of the pandemic 
 Government handling of the pandemic The public are more positive about the UK government’s handling of
  the pandemic now than at earlier points in the pandemic. 54% of those aged
  16-75 believe that the UK government’s response to the pandemic has been
  confused and inconsistent, but that has declined since 2020 and particularly
  fallen since the second lockdown in November 2020 when two-thirds (68%) said
  that was the case. On the other hand 38% believe that the government has responded well
  to changing scientific advice (up from 27% in November 2020), while 28% say
  they have not. And when comparing our government to others, 42% of 16-75
  year-olds say the UK government has responded well to the pandemic compared
  to other countries (up from 28% in July 2020), with 27% disagreeing. On balance, UK adults think that advice from scientists and experts has
  been good during the pandemic and that government has used it effectively.
  Only one in five (21%) believe that scientists and medical experts have given
  the government poor advice during the pandemic while 46% disagree. Four in
  ten (43%) believe that the UK government has made good use of that advice
  while 28% do not. Perceptions of the NHS A majority believe that a range of the NHS services have got worse
  since before the pandemic began, but they also tend to think that this is at
  least partly because of the pandemic. Britons believe that the following services have got worse since
  before the pandemic began: 
 But amongst those who think things have got worse, half or more tend
  to believe that this is at least mostly because of the pandemic rather than
  other reasons: 
 Gideon Skinner, Research Director at Ipsos said: These findings, marking the two-year
  anniversary of the first national lockdown, are further evidence of how over
  that time life in the UK has changed for many people, affecting a range of
  aspects of our physical and mental health.  Although we shouldn’t
  overestimate this (more people think there has been no impact, and some of
  these changes may have happened naturally without the pandemic), it is
  notable that it is often younger generations who feel harder hit.  This
  all suggests that most Britons are right to feel that the after-effects of
  the coronavirus are not over yet. Professor Bobby Duffy, director of the
  Policy Institute at King’s College London, said: The effects of the pandemic and the measures
  to control it are still keenly felt by significant proportions of the UK
  population – with a third of us saying we’re lonelier and sleeping less well,
  nearly half of us seeing our friends less and leaving home less, and half
  spending more time on our screens. It’s no surprise then that a third of us
  feel our mental or physical health is worse. And, as with so much in the
  pandemic, some groups are feeling the effects more, with the young and women
  more likely to experience many of these negative impacts. We’re also deeply
  worried about the impact on the NHS, particularly waiting times and how the
  pandemic has affected the wellbeing of NHS staff. (Ipsos MORI) 23 March 2022 Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/two-years-of-life-under-lockdown-how-has-uk-and-peoples-lives-changed 735-43-10/Polls The Passion Of The French For Video Games Is Undeniable
  
 Console, PC Gaming and mobile: the 3
  ecosystems achieved solid performances. 
 
 “ Video gaming continues to
  progress to new heights. The year 2020 had been extraordinary, but
  special because of the context. This growth confirmed in 2021 is part of
  a real underlying trend. The French have never played so much. 73%
  of them play occasionally and 58% regularly, an increase of 6 points compared
  to 2020 , ” comments
  Julie Chalmette, President of SELL. A 2021 market boosted by Hardware sales With the arrival of new consoles and a strong dynamism of PC Gaming,
  the 2021 video game market is driven by the growth of Hardware (Console + PC
  Gaming) which reached a historic turnover of 1.766 billion euros, i.e. +22%
  growth compared to 2020. With 795 million euros generated, the console
  hardware segment recorded its best performance since 2010 (€873 million) with
  growth of +17%. This even though the supply difficulties in 2021 did not
  allow manufacturers to meet the strong demand. Console hardware
  therefore benefits from a large reservoir of growth. This should
  therefore continue in 2022 and affect the entire sector. The video game
  market, whose model is cyclical,  
 A slight decline in software expected Software (Console + PC / Physical + dematerialized) posted solid
  performance, with revenue of 1.996 billion euros, down -11% compared to 2020,
  a historically strong year due to the unprecedented context and the very rich
  news of the sector. Excluding mobile, nearly 24 million complete games
  were sold in France in 2021 (Console + PC), in physical or digital format,
  i.e. a drop in volume of -14% compared to 2020: 91% of these complete games
  were sold on console, and 58% in physical format.  After a year 2021 marked by launch delays, the 2022 market looks very
  positive with the launch of many highly anticipated games. (Ipsos France) March 24, 2022 Source: https://www.ipsos.com/fr-fr/la-passion-des-francais-pour-le-jeu-video-ne-se-dement-pas 735-43-11/Polls Every Fifth Person In Germany Has Felt Racially Discriminated Against
  Today, March 21st, is the annual International Day Against
  Racism. Racism is not only a much-discussed, socially relevant topic in
  Germany. 19 percent of all respondents in Germany state that they have
  had the feeling of being racially discriminated against. Among people
  who are exclusively German nationals, 13 percent say so. On the other
  hand, 46 percent of those surveyed in Germany who are not of German
  nationality say so. These are the results of current surveys by the international Data
  & Analytics Group YouGov and LINK Marketing Services AG, which belongs to
  the YouGov Group, for which 2,082 people in Germany from March 8th to 10th,
  2022 and 1,220 people in Switzerland from March 7th to 11th March 2022 were
  surveyed using standardized online interviews. The results were weighted
  and are representative of the German population aged 18 and over and the
  Swiss population aged 15 to 79. For three out of five Germans, racism is a
  serious problem in their own country Currently, 60 percent of Germans say that racism is a serious problem
  in Germany. Women say this more often than men (66 percent vs. 53
  percent of men). More than two out of five Germans (45 percent) are of
  the opinion that too little is currently being done against racism in
  Germany. Men are less likely to hold this view than women (39 percent
  vs. 51 percent of women). For 40 percent of all respondents, not enough
  is being done against racism in Germany. In the same survey of Swiss citizens, 47 percent of respondents
  believe that racism is a serious problem in Switzerland at the
  moment. The value is therefore 14 percentage points below that in
  Germany. Almost every fifth person in Germany has
  already campaigned against racism 18 percent of those surveyed in Germany state that they have already
  taken a public stand against racism, for example by taking part in a
  demonstration. Respondents aged 18 to 24 say this most frequently (35
  percent), those aged 55 and over least often (11 percent). 12 percent of
  all those surveyed in Switzerland say so. Swiss have taken (ill-considered) racist
  attitudes more often than Germans 64 percent of Swiss people currently say they have taken a racist
  attitude, even if it was thoughtless. This means that the Swiss make
  this statement more often than respondents in Germany: In this country, 40
  percent state that they have already taken a racist attitude, even if it was
  thoughtless. (YouGov Germany) March 21, 2022 Source: https://yougov.de/news/2022/03/21/jeder-funfte-deutschland-hat-sich-schon-einmal-ras/ NORTH
  AMERICA
  735-43-12/Polls More Houses Of Worship Are Returning To Normal Operations, But
  In-Person Attendance Is Unchanged Since Fall
  As COVID-19 cases
  continue to decline and pandemic
  restrictions are eased across the United States, churches and other
  houses of worship increasingly are holding services the way they did before
  the outbreak began, according to a new Pew Research Center survey. But there
  has not been a corresponding rise over the past six months in the share of
  Americans who are attending in-person services. Among U.S. adults who say they attend religious services, 43% now
  report that their house of worship is currently open and holding services the
  same way it did before the COVID-19
  outbreak – up 14 percentage points in the last six months and 31
  points since last March. Meanwhile, 47% say their congregation is open but
  with modifications still in place due to the pandemic, such as mask
  requirements or social distancing. Just 5% say their congregation is still completely closed to
  in-person worship, unchanged since September of last year (6%). In other
  words, the overall share of U.S. worshippers who say their congregation is
  open to in-person services has not increased over the last six months, but
  fewer people say their services include coronavirus-related precautions. The same survey shows that attendance at in-person services – which
  grew steadily from July 2020 through September 2021 – has plateaued, as has
  the share of adults watching religious services online or on TV. In July 2020, roughly four months after COVID-19 upended life in
  America, 13% of U.S. adults reported having attended religious services in
  person during the previous month. That figure rose to 17% in March
  2021 and then to 26% in September
  2021, and now stands at 27%.   Over the same period, the share of Americans who say they have
  streamed religious services online or watched them on TV in the past month
  declined from 36% in July 2020 to 28% in September 2021 and is now 30%. About a third of U.S. adults (32%) in the new March survey say
  they typically go to
  religious services at least once or twice a month. Of these self-described
  regular attenders, two-thirds (67%) report that they actually have attended
  physically (in person) in the last month, while 57% say they have watched
  services online or on TV during that period. The survey’s questions about in-person and virtual attendance can be
  combined to provide a sense of how many people are watching services
  online instead of
  attending in person, and how many are watching online in addition to attending in person.
  The Center’s survey finds that among all adults who say they typically attend
  services at least monthly, 36% have both attended in person and watched services digitally in
  the last month, while three-in-ten (31%) say they have only attended in
  person but not watched online or on TV in the last month. One-in-five (21%) may still be substituting virtual attendance for
  in-person attendance, saying they recently have watched religious services
  online or on TV but have not attended in person. Just 12% of self-described
  regular attenders report that they have neither gone in person nor watched
  services virtually in the last month. Assessing the impact of the pandemic on religious service attendance
  remains difficult for two main reasons. One is that the ultimate course of
  the pandemic is still unclear. What appears, at this moment, to be a plateau
  in religious service attendance could be followed by a rise if the pandemic
  gradually recedes, or by a drop if a new, highly infectious coronavirus
  variant emerges. The second reason for uncertainty is that, prior to the pandemic, Pew
  Research Center surveys did not clearly distinguish between physical
  attendance at religious services and virtual attendance. While religious
  congregations as a whole may have experienced a large drop in physical
  attendance during the pandemic, there’s good reason to believe that virtual
  attendance is much higher today than it was before the coronavirus outbreak
  began in early 2020. One piece of evidence is that, in a July
  2020 survey, 18% of U.S. adults said that since the pandemic began, they
  had watched religious services online or on TV for the first time. Combining both forms
  of attendance, nearly nine-in-ten people who say they are regular attenders
  (88%) report that they have participated one way or the other in religious
  services in the past month. In addition, the share of all
  U.S. adults who say they have either attended religious
  services in person or watched online or on TV (or both) in the past month
  (43%) is substantially greater than the share who say they typically attend
  religious services at least once or twice a month (32% among all March 2022
  survey respondents). This suggests that people’s actual behavior may vary
  from month to month, or that some people may not think of online services when
  answering the question about their typical attendance. The new study, like previous surveys, finds notable differences in
  attendance patterns across Christian subgroups. For example, Protestant
  churchgoers in the historically Black tradition stand out for being the
  Christian group most likely to have only watched
  religious services online or on TV in the last month, with about a third
  (35%) describing their behavior this way. Indeed, while Black Americans are, on average, more
  religious than White and Hispanic Americans by a number of religious
  commitment measures, churchgoers in the historically Black Protestant
  tradition (48%) are substantially less likely than evangelical Protestants
  (75%), mainline Protestants (68%) and Catholics (69%) to say they have
  attended religious services in person in the last month. (Other
  surveys show that the pandemic has hit communities
  of color especially hard.) Meanwhile, among those who typically attend religious services at
  least monthly, Protestants in the historically Black tradition (73%)
  are more likely than
  evangelical (64%) and mainline (56%) Protestants to say they have watched
  services virtually in the last month, and all of these groups are more likely
  than Catholics (40%) to say they have done so. Mainline Protestant churchgoers stand out for rising rates of
  in-person attendance, with the share saying they have attended a service in
  the last month increasing by 12 points since September 2021 (from 56% to
  68%). Although the survey was conducted among Americans of all religious
  backgrounds, including Jews, Muslims, Buddhists and Hindus, it did not obtain
  enough respondents from non-Christian groups to report separately on their
  responses. Small subgroups of Christians are unable to be analyzed separately
  for the same reason. When it comes to the operating status of congregations, a majority of
  evangelical Protestants who typically attend religious services at least
  monthly or say they attended in person in the past month (60%) say their
  church is open and holding services in the same way it did before the
  pandemic began. Evangelicals are significantly more likely than mainline
  Protestants (33%) and Catholics (43%) to say this is the case. Among
  Protestants in the historically Black tradition, just 21% say their
  congregation is open and operating normally, while roughly two-thirds (65%)
  say their church is open but with changes or restrictions still in place due
  to the pandemic. Among religious attenders, the share of Republicans and
  Republican-leaning independents who say their house of worship is currently
  open and operating the way it did before the pandemic is roughly double the
  share of Democratic congregants who say the same (58% vs. 27%). Democrats
  (and Democratic leaners) who regularly attend religious services are much
  more likely than their Republican counterparts to report that their house of
  worship is open but operating with pandemic-induced changes in place (60% vs.
  37%). Republicans who typically attend religious services also are much
  more likely than Democrats in the same category to say they have attended
  religious services in person in the last month (77% vs. 58%). But members of
  both parties are equally likely to say they recently have watched services
  online or on TV (57% each). (PEW) MARCH 22, 2022 735-43-13/Polls Biden's Job Approval Is 42%, Statistically Unchanged From 41% Last
  Month
   At 42%, President Joe Biden's latest job approval rating marks
  his seventh consecutive reading below 44%, while a majority of Americans,
  54%, continue to disapprove of the job he is doing. Although Biden's overall rating is flat, Americans' approval of his
  handling of the coronavirus response (53%) and the situation with Russia
  (42%) has each risen six points over the past month. At the same time,
  approval of his handling of foreign affairs (43%) and the economy (36%) is
  not significantly different than in February. President Joe Biden's Approval Ratings Among U.S. Adults % Who approve of way Biden is handling each 
 The latest readings are from a March 1-18 Gallup poll, during which
  Russian military forces pressed farther into Ukraine and many Ukrainians fled
  the country. In response to Russia's continued military action, the Biden
  administration increased sanctions on the country and Congress passed an aid
  package to support Ukraine. Meanwhile, the sagging U.S. economy worsened, as inflation hit its
  highest point since 1982 and gas prices rose to all-time highs. One bright
  spot for the country was the further decrease in COVID-19 infections. In addition to the four issues measured in February and March, the
  latest survey finds 45% of Americans approving of Biden's handling of the
  environment and 38% of his handling of energy policy. This is the first time
  Gallup has measured approval on these two issues. Biden's Overall Job Approval Rating Steady,
  Sharply Polarized Since September,
  Americans' overall approval of Biden has ranged from 40% to 43%, well below
  the majority-level ratings he received during the first six months of his presidency. 
 Line graph. Trend in President Joe Biden's job approval ratings, from
  January 2021 to March 2022. After staying at or above 49% through August of
  his first year, Biden's job approval rating fell to 43% in September and
  since then has ranged from 40% to 43%. The current reading is 42%. The drop
  in Biden's approval rating last July was largely the result of a
  decline in approval among political independents. Their rating of the
  president has not risen above 50% since. Democrats' current 84% rating of
  Biden is more than twice independents' 38% and dwarfs Republicans' 5%. 
 Line graph. Trend in President Joe Biden's job approval ratings by
  political party, from January 2021 to March 2022. President Biden has
  consistently held approval ratings of 78% or higher among Democrats,
  including the latest rating of 84%. His approval ratings among Republicans
  have typically been below 10%, including the latest, 5%. Sixty-one percent of
  independents approved of Biden at the beginning of his presidency, and a
  majority did through June. Since September, independents' rating has been at
  or below 40%, including the current 38%. Biden's Issue Approval Ratings Reflect
  Recent Events and Partisans' Views Gallup has periodically
  tracked Biden's approval ratings on the economy, foreign affairs and the
  coronavirus response since the beginning of his presidency. Early on, Biden
  had majority-level approval on all three issues; however, by November, those ratings had all fallen
  below 50%. Biden's handling of the pandemic has consistently been his
  greatest strength among these issues and is back above the majority level in
  the latest poll. The current uptick in approval of Biden's response to COVID-19 is
  likely tied to Americans' improved
  outlook for the pandemic, while the relatively steady but low ratings for
  his handling of the economy and foreign affairs may reflect stubbornly
  persistent inflation and the challenging international climate right now. 
 Line graph. President Joe Biden's approval ratings for his handling
  of the economy, foreign affairs and the response to the coronavirus since
  February 2021, when he had majority-level approval on all three issues. By
  November, those ratings had all fallen below 50%. Biden's handling of the
  pandemic has consistently been his greatest strength among these issues and
  is back above the majority level at 53% in the latest poll. Currently, 43% of
  U.S. adults approve of his handling of foreign affairs and 36% of the
  economy. Biden's rating for his handling of the situation with Russia has been
  measured on only three occasions, including a 39% reading in August, 36% last
  month and 42% currently. Partisans' approval ratings of Biden's handling of the six issues are
  politically polarized, much like his overall job rating, although a slim
  majority of independents and about one in five Republicans express approval
  for his handling of the pandemic. Partisans' Issue Approval Ratings of President Joe Biden % Who approve of the way Biden is handling each 
 Bottom Line Biden is currently
  facing sizable challenges at home and abroad, and his approval ratings are
  largely mired in mediocrity. In the
  current hyperpolarized climate, his ability to achieve approval ratings above
  50% hinges largely on independents, whose support for him dwindled during the
  coronavirus surge last summer and fell further after the U.S. withdrawal from
  Afghanistan. The two areas of modest growth for Biden this month -- his handling
  of the response to COVID-19 and the Russia-Ukraine war -- are fragile and
  volatile situations. With a new variant of the coronavirus gaining steam and
  the fighting in Ukraine intensifying, further gains in Biden's approval
  ratings may prove elusive. (Gallup) MARCH 22, 2022 Source: https://news.gallup.com/poll/390953/biden-job-rating-tepid-covid-russia-handling.aspx 735-43-14/Polls A Broad Majority Of Americans (69%) Favor The United States Taking
  Steps To Become Carbon Neutral By 2050
  A broad majority of Americans (69%) favor the United States taking
  steps to become carbon neutral by 2050, according to a Pew
  Research Center survey conducted in January. But while some
  advocates suggest that nuclear power – a source that emits no carbon – should
  have a more prominent role in the nation’s energy makeup, the public
  continues to express mixed views about it as an energy source. Around a third of U.S. adults (35%) say the federal government should
  encourage the production of nuclear power, while about a quarter (26%) say
  the government should discourage it. Another 37% say the federal government
  should neither encourage nor discourage the production of nuclear power. The
  survey was fielded before Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine and the renewed
  discussions about nuclear power and other current energy sources it
  has prompted. Americans are far more likely to say the federal government should
  encourage the production of wind and solar power (72%) and the use of
  electric vehicles (51%) than to say the same about nuclear power. In fact,
  the public is about as likely to say the government should encourage oil and
  gas drilling as it is to say the government should encourage nuclear power
  production. Previous surveys by the Center have also found Americans are closely
  divided in views of nuclear energy. In an April
  2021 survey, half of U.S. adults said they favored expanding nuclear
  power plants in the country to generate electricity, compared with 47% who
  opposed it. Views on this question have fluctuated somewhat, but no more than
  half of adults in any survey since 2016, the first time this question was
  asked, have favored expanding nuclear power plants to generate electricity. The U.S. currently has 93
  nuclear power reactors, plus two that are under construction. These
  reactors collectively generated 18.8% of
  all U.S. electricity last year. The number of operational nuclear power reactors in the U.S. has
  steadily declined since peaking at 107 reactors in 1990. Still, nuclear power
  is a part of many state governments’ plans to transition away from fossil
  fuels. About two-thirds of states have reported plans to incorporate nuclear
  in their energy policies, according
  to a recent Associated Press analysis. The nuclear power sector has also
  garnered some federal support through the $6
  billion Civil Nuclear Credit Program included in the recently
  enacted bipartisan infrastructure law. Some policymakers laud nuclear power’s potential ability to cut
  greenhouse gas emissions, while others cite radioactive
  waste storage issues and notorious
  accidents to make the case against nuclear. In Japan, for example,
  the 2011 Fukushima
  Daiichi accident led the government to drastically decrease reliance
  on nuclear power. The accident also led to reappraisals of
  nuclear energy production in other countries. More recently (and after the
  January survey was completed), Russian military attacks in Ukraine have raised
  fears of accidents at several
  seized nuclear power plants in the area – including the Chernobyl
  site, which experienced a nuclear disaster in 1986. Gender, partisan differences in views of
  nuclear power There are long-standing differences by gender and party affiliation
  in views about the federal government’s role in nuclear energy production and
  nuclear power more broadly. Men are nearly twice as likely as women to say the federal government
  should encourage the production of nuclear power (46% vs. 25%). Views differ
  by gender globally, too, according to a Center
  survey conducted from fall 2019 to spring 2020. Men were more likely
  than women to favor using more nuclear power as a source of domestic energy
  in 18 of the 20 publics surveyed across Europe, the Asia-Pacific region,
  Russia, the U.S., Canada and Brazil. Republicans and GOP-leaning independents are 10 percentage points
  more likely than Democrats and Democratic leaners (42% vs. 32%) to say the
  federal government should encourage the production of nuclear power.
  Conservative Republicans (45%) are most likely to say the government should
  encourage nuclear power production, while 36% of moderate and liberal
  Republicans say the same. Democrats are 13 percentage points more likely than
  Republicans to say the government should discourage this activity (31% vs. 18%). Partisan differences were also evident in the Center’s earlier
  surveys. In April 2021, six-in-ten Republicans favored expanding nuclear
  power plants to generate electricity in the country, compared with 43% of
  Democrats. Republicans have expressed support of nuclear power expansion in
  greater shares than Democrats each time this survey question has been asked since
  2016. But there are larger partisan gaps on views of other energy sources,
  such as fossil fuels. In 2021, Republicans were far more likely than
  Democrats to support more offshore oil and gas drilling in U.S. waters (69%
  vs. 22%) and more coal mining in the country (60% vs. 17%). (PEW) MARCH 23, 2022 735-43-15/Polls 71% Of Republican Voters Say Their Vote For Congress Is Against Biden
  People vote at the Millennium Youth Entertainment Complex on March 1,
  2022, in Austin, Texas. (Montinique Monroe/Getty Images) Pew Research Center conducted this study to understand how the public
  views control of Congress, issues for the upcoming midterm elections and
  confidence in how the elections will be conducted. For this analysis, we
  surveyed 10,441 U.S. adults in March 2022. Everyone who took part in this
  survey is a member of the Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP), an online
  survey panel that is recruited through national, random sampling of
  residential addresses. This way nearly all U.S. adults have a chance of
  selection. The survey is weighted to be representative of the U.S. adult
  population by gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education and
  other categories. Read
  more about the ATP’s methodology. Here are the questions
  used for the report, along with responses, and its
  methodology. With the midterm congressional elections still more than seven months
  away, registered voters are evenly divided between the two major parties in
  their election preferences. At the same time, Republican voters are more
  likely than Democratic voters to say it “really matters” which party gains
  control of Congress in this fall’s midterms. At this early stage of the campaign, President Joe Biden is much more
  of a motivating factor for Republican than Democratic voters: 71% of
  Republican and Republican-leaning voters say they think of their vote as
  being “against” Biden; far fewer Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters
  (46%) view their vote as a vote “for” the president. The new Pew Research Center survey of 10,441 U.S. adults, including
  9,021 registered voters, conducted March 7-13, 2022, finds that most voters
  (63%) say which party wins control of Congress in this year’s elections
  “really matters,” similar to the share who said this in early 2018 (65%). Today, in contrast with 2018, Republican registered voters (70%) are
  more likely than Democratic voters (60%) to say which party wins control of
  Congress this year really matters. Four years ago, there were only slight
  partisan differences on this measure (67% of Democrats and 65% of Republicans
  said it really mattered which party controlled Congress following the
  elections) and that remained the case throughout the 2018 campaign. The new survey finds that equal shares of registered voters say, if
  the elections were held today, they would support the Republican candidate or
  the Democratic candidate (43% each) in their district. Another 10% say they
  are not sure who they would support, while 4% would vote for other
  candidates. Early in the 2018 midterm cycle,
  Democratic candidates had a double-digit edge over Republicans on the generic
  congressional ballot. Democrats went on to gain the majority in the U.S.
  House of Representatives that year. As in previous midterms, voters are more likely to view their vote as
  an expression of opposition than support for the president. That is the case
  today: 36% say their midterm vote is against Biden, while 24% think of it as
  a vote for Biden; 38% say Biden is not much of a factor in their voting
  decision. The partisan disparity in these views is wide: Nearly three times as
  many Republican voters think of their vote as being against Biden as say the
  president is not much of a factor in their vote (71% vs. 26%); by contrast,
  Democratic voters are about equally likely to say Biden is not much of a
  factor (47%) as to say their midterm vote will be “for” him (46%). Amid the continuing conflicts over the 2020 election, a majority of
  Americans say they are very (23%) or somewhat confident (40%) that the
  midterm elections will be conducted fairly and accurately. However, there are
  sizable partisan differences in confidence: While 76% of Democrats say they
  are confident the fall elections will be conducted fairly and accurately (32%
  are very confident), only about half of Republicans (47%) say the same (12%
  say they are very confident). Seven-in-ten adults are also very or somewhat confident that all
  citizens who want to vote in the congressional elections will be able to do
  so. There are partisan differences in these views as well: Democrats are
  about 20 percentage points less likely than Republicans to express confidence
  that all citizens who want to vote will be able to do so (61% of Democrats
  vs. 83% of Republicans). Top election issues for Republicans and
  Democrats About eight-in-ten voters (78%) say the economy is very important to
  their vote this fall, making it the top issue out of 15 asked about in the
  survey. Republicans are particularly likely to say the economy is very
  important to their vote in the fall: 90% say this, compared with 68% of
  Democrats. Roughly two-thirds of Republican voters say that immigration (68%),
  foreign policy (67%) and violent crime (67%) are very important to their
  vote, while nearly as many (62%) say this about the size and scope of
  government. Democratic voters are less likely than Republicans to say each of
  these is very important, though the gap is particularly pronounced on the
  issues of immigration (just 34% of Democrats say immigration is very
  important to their vote in the fall) and the size and scope of government
  (just 26% of Democrats say this is very important to their vote). By comparison, health care is the top issue for Democratic voters in
  the fall, with 74% saying it is very important to their vote; just 44% of
  Republican voters say the same. About two-thirds of Democratic voters point to voting policies (66%)
  and education (also 66%) as very important to their vote, modestly higher
  than the shares of GOP voters naming these issues as very important to their
  vote. But the partisan gap over climate change is one of the largest in the
  survey: Democratic voters are 50 percentage points more likely than
  Republican voters to name it as an important issue in their vote (64% vs.
  14%) and are 40 points more likely to say the same about issues around race
  and ethnicity (54% vs. 14%). Just a third of voters say that the coronavirus outbreak will be a
  very important issue in their vote this fall, though Democrats are more than
  twice as likely as Republicans to say this (46% vs. 19%). Congressional vote preferences Overall, voters are split on who they would vote for if the elections
  were held today: 43% say they would vote for the Republican candidate in
  their district, while an identical share say they would vote for the
  Democratic candidate; 4% say they would vote for another candidate and 10%
  say they are not sure. There are wide differences in vote preference based on race and
  ethnicity, age and education. About half of White voters (51%) say they would vote for the
  Republican candidate, while 37% would vote Democratic. By contrast, a large
  majority of Black voters (72%) say they would prefer the Democratic
  candidate, while 7% prefer the Republican candidate. Asian voters favor
  Democratic over Republican candidates by about two-to-one (59% vs. 31%);
  Hispanic voters also favor Democrats (50%) over Republicans (28%). As in recent elections, older voters remain more supportive of
  Republican candidates than Democrats: Half of voters ages 65 and older say
  they would vote for a Republican if the elections were held today, while 41%
  say they would vote for a Democrat. By contrast, about half of voters under
  30 say they would vote for a Democratic candidate if the elections were held
  today, while 29% say they would back the GOP candidate. Voters under 30 also
  are about twice as likely as voters 65 and older to be unsure about who they
  would vote for (13% vs. 7%). Voters with college degrees, especially those with postgraduate
  degrees, are more supportive of Democrats than Republicans this fall, while
  Republicans hold an advantage among voters with some college or less
  education. (PEW) MARCH 24, 2022 735-43-16/Polls After A Month Of War, Ukrainian Refugee Crisis Ranks Among The
  World’s Worst In Recent History
  Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has created one of the biggest refugee
  crises of modern times. A month into the war, more than 3.7 million Ukrainians have
  fled to neighboring countries – the sixth-largest refugee outflow over the
  past 60-plus years, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of United
  Nations data. There are now almost as many Ukrainian refugees as there were Afghan
  refugees fleeing the (first) Taliban regime in 2001, according to figures
  compiled by the UN
  High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). They represent about 9.1% of
  Ukraine’s pre-invasion population of about 41.1 million – ranking the current
  crisis 16th among 28 major refugee crises by share of population.   The Center examined all cases in the UNHCR’s database since 1960
  where there were at least 500,000 refugees and similarly displaced people
  from a given country in a given year. The analysis doesn’t include
  “internally displaced persons” – those who have fled or been forced from
  their usual homes but haven’t yet crossed an international border. (Earlier
  this week, UNHCR head Filippo Grandi estimated that, all told, 10
  million Ukrainians – nearly a quarter of the population – had been
  displaced either internally or externally by the war.) Syria’s civil war, which began in 2011, has created more refugees
  than any other crisis since the early 1960s, when UNHCR began keeping data on
  individual countries. Nearly 6.9 million Syrians – about a third of the
  country’s prewar population – are living as refugees or asylum-seekers
  outside their home country, with almost 3.7 million now in Turkey. An
  additional 6.8 million Syrians have been displaced from their homes but are
  living elsewhere in the country – meaning the civil war has uprooted about
  two-thirds of Syria’s entire population. Afghanistan, which has been at war either with itself or with outside
  forces for more than four decades, has had more than 2 million refugees every
  year since 1981. The peak year was 1990, after Soviet troops had withdrawn
  from the country and the USSR-backed government was battling to hang onto
  power against a coalition of mujahedeen groups. That year, more than half the
  country’s total estimated population – 6.3 million people – were listed as
  refugees. Venezuela has also seen massive population outflows over the past
  several years as the country’s economy has all but collapsed,
  its government has cracked
  down on dissent, and opposition efforts
  to unseat President Nicolas Maduro’s government have stalled.
  According to the UNHCR, more than 5 million Venezuelans are refugees in other
  countries, are seeking asylum, or have been otherwise displaced abroad – all
  told, about 15% of the current estimated population. (PEW) MARCH 25, 2022 735-43-17/Polls About Two-Thirds Of U S Adults (65%) Say Science Has Had A Mostly
  Positive Effect On Society
  About two-thirds of U.S. adults (65%) say science has had a mostly
  positive effect on society, while 28% say it has had an equal mix of positive
  and negative effects and just 7% say it has had a mostly negative effect,
  according to a recent Pew Research Center survey. Over the past few years,
  around two-thirds or more of Americans have seen science’s effect on society
  as mostly positive. Of course, science encompasses a wide swath of disparate fields and
  developments. What exactly do Americans have in mind when they think about
  science? A few common themes arise when U.S. adults are asked to talk about
  science’s effects on society in their own words or when they discuss areas of
  science they follow or find interesting. Most prominent among these are
  developments in health and medicine, such as new treatments for disease.
  Other, less commonly mentioned areas include references to computer and
  digital technology, the environment and advances in space exploration. Here’s
  a closer look at what Americans mean when they think about science, based on
  a new analysis of open-ended survey data and focus group discussions from the
  past several years. Many mention health and medical advances when
  asked how science influences society In a January
  2019 survey, the Center asked Americans who said science has had a mostly
  positive effect on society to explain, in their own words, what they had in
  mind. The most common answer – given by 56% of those asked – referred to
  health and medical advancements, such as disease eradication, medical devices
  and new medications, and cancer research leading to longer lifespans and
  improved public health. Medical science was also top of mind for some of those who said
  science has had a mostly negative effect
  on society. Some in this group lamented the wait for cures of serious
  diseases while others cited concerns about developments in biotechnology,
  such as cloning and “designer babies.” These responses are generally in line with some of the themes that
  came up during a series of virtual focus groups the Center conducted in July
  2021. The 12 focus groups consisted of 28 Black and 29 Hispanic adults and
  were part of a broader effort to better understand opinion about science and
  scientists among these racial and ethnic groups. The topics that were
  mentioned in these discussions offer another window into what the public sees
  as science. Asked to elaborate on the areas of science they find interesting or
  exciting – or to discuss the science topic areas they follow in the news –
  several focus group participants referenced health and medicine. One Hispanic
  man in the 25-39 age group said he paid attention to “anything that has been
  developed in the medicine world or just for different treatments.” Others mentioned progress in treatment for specific diseases such as
  cancer, sickle cell disease, diabetes or HIV, or the development of
  coronavirus vaccines. For example, one Black woman in the 40-65 age range
  said she was excited to hear about medical breakthroughs, such as “stuff with
  heart patients that they’ve done. Stuff with blood treatments and just going
  back to blood transfusions and cancer treatments, things of that sort.” Another Black woman in the 40-65 age group said, “It’s more about the
  treatments that they are finding for diseases and for the vaccines and things
  they’re coming up with, especially for COVID and just the different types of
  treatments that are helping people, the different types of diseases. That’s
  what interests me most.” It’s more about the treatments that they are finding for diseases and
  for the vaccines and things they’re coming up with, especially for COVID and
  just the different types of treatments that are helping people, the different
  types of diseases. That’s what interests me most. A Black woman in the 40-65 age group, speaking in a focus group Some connect science with advances in
  digital technology In the Center’s 2019 survey, a smaller but still sizable segment of
  the public described the effects of science in terms of technology,
  computerization, workplace automation, GPS tools or social media platforms. Participants in the Center’s 2021 focus group discussions also
  pointed to developments in technology, as well as the so-called “internet of
  things” – from GPS navigation to voice-activated assistants – as sources of
  interest and excitement for them. A Black man in the 40-65 age group said, “I
  find all the new products they are coming out with exciting. I can say,
  ‘Alexa, play music,’ and she’ll play my music.” Others talked about developments in robotics and artificial
  intelligence as an area that catches their attention. A Black woman in the
  25-39 age group said, “The improvements, we have drones flying in the air.
  Now you’re talking about drones delivering our packages.” Some participants said they were interested in the ways digital
  technology connects people. One Hispanic woman in the 40-65 age range said,
  “I think technology has taken us to a third dimension, the fact that we can
  communicate with people in other parts of the world is something we never
  thought we could do.” I think technology has taken us to a third dimension, the fact that
  we can communicate with people in other parts of the world is something we
  never thought we could do. A Hispanic woman in the 40-65 age range, speaking in a focus group Others think about the environment, space
  exploration and more A number of other areas come to mind when people think about the
  effects of science on society. Some respondents to the 2019 survey gave a
  broad answer, such as the idea that science provides a better understanding
  of our world. Others mentioned a range of specifics, including improvements
  in food safety and crop yields, weather forecasting and air travel. Among the
  ideas that came up repeatedly were references to climate, energy and the
  environment, as well as the world of space exploration. Focus group discussions in 2021 also touched on a range of topics,
  including some related to space. One Black woman in the 25-39 age group
  described what she found interesting as “the commercial travel of people into
  outer space, and then the research behind the different planets and finding
  out what’s beyond our galaxy.” What science means to people in the UK While this analysis is limited to the United States, there is some
  evidence that people in other countries may think of similar things when they
  think about science. In the United Kingdom, government surveys have asked respondents to
  explain, in their own words, what comes to mind when they think of science.
  In the most recent of these, the 2019
  UK Public Attitudes to Science survey, 24% of UK adults ages 16 and older
  associated science with fields of study such as biology, chemistry or
  physics. Another 16% referred to health, drugs, medicine and doctors. As was the case in the U.S., some UK adults in the 2019 survey
  referred to technology (mentioned by 13%) or to space, rockets and astronomy
  (mentioned by 15%). (PEW) MARCH 25, 2022 AUSTRALIA
  735-43-18/Polls Australians To Spend Billions On Holidays, Food And Chocolate This
  Easter
  Over four million Australians are planning a trip away this Easter
  with $7.1 billion to be spent on holidays, while around $1.5 billion will be
  splurged on food and chocolate, in a major boon for tourism operators and
  retail businesses. Research released today by the Australian Retailers Association (ARA)
  in conjunction with Roy Morgan has found that: • Of the Australians going away this Easter, 63% will be travelling
  within their own state, 34% will be going interstate and 3% overseas ARA CEO Paul Zahra said Easter is a time for family get togethers,
  travel, and specialist food like easter eggs and hot cross buns, which will
  be in hot demand this year.  (Roy Morgan) March 25 2022 MULTICOUNTRY
  STUDIES
  735-43-19/Polls U S Image Improves Across Most Of NATO, A Survey Of 27 NATO Countries
  U.S. President Joe Biden will need to lean into newfound goodwill
  among NATO allies on Thursday as he meets with NATO leaders in a high-stakes
  summit about the war in Ukraine. Gallup surveys conducted before Russia invaded Ukraine in February
  2022 showed the image of U.S. leadership was stronger across much of NATO
  than it had been in years, after languishing at low levels during the Trump
  administration. Between 2020 and 2021, U.S. leadership saw double-digit gains
  in 20 of the 27 NATO members surveyed both years. Ratings of U.S. leadership in many countries in 2021 -- including key
  NATO partners such as Germany and the Netherlands -- matched or surpassed
  levels seen during the Obama administration. U.S. Leadership Approval Across NATO Members 
 Lithuania was the only NATO member where approval ratings headed in a
  negative direction, with a six-percentage-point drop. But even so, the
  leadership of the U.S. earned higher approval in Lithuania last year than did
  the leadership of Russia (8%) and China (5%). Implications In the aftermath of the
  U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, one of the big questions was
  how much damage the quick pullout might have done to Biden's credibility on
  the world stage and whether it might
  hamper his future ability to work with U.S. allies. While a fair number of NATO countries were surveyed before the U.S.
  withdrawal and it's not possible to see how much of an effect that might have
  had on approval, a fair number were also surveyed during or well after the
  U.S. withdrawal. This includes Belgium, which saw a 29-point increase between
  2020 and 2021. Few outside Moscow likely could have foreseen how quickly U.S. power
  would be tested with Russia's invasion of Ukraine. And even fewer likely
  anticipated the entire geopolitical order would essentially be upended as
  Biden started his second year in office. The only certainty about what happens next is its potential to shape
  the future world order. The data suggest that the U.S. has more support in
  the court of global public opinion now than it did in the recent past, and
  that could help it exercise its soft power with world leaders. (Gallup) MARCH 23, 2022 Source: https://news.gallup.com/poll/391160/image-improves-across-nato.aspx 735-43-20/Polls What MENA Citizens Think About The Environment, Among 12 Countries
  Surveyed
  From 28 to 31 March 2022, the inaugural Middle East and North Africa
  Climate Week 2022 in Dubai, UAE will bring together key stakeholders to take
  the pulse of climate action in the region, explore climate challenges and
  opportunities to build forward from the pandemic and showcase ambitious
  solutions. Arab Barometer’s 2018-2019 wave of surveys found that
  citizens across MENA overwhelmingly regard water pollution and trash as grave
  environmental concerns, while relatively fewer citizens worry about air
  pollution and climate change. And despite awareness of the danger of certain
  environmental issues in MENA, environmental protection doesn’t rise as a
  public priority, according to Arab Barometer’s 2020-2021 surveys. Here are key findings from Arab Barometer wave five (2018-2019) and
  wave six (2020-2021): 1- Water
  Pollution and trash dominate MENA citizens’ list of environmental worries,
  while air pollution and climate change are viewed as less important. Still,
  the level of concern varies across the region. Lebanon is the most alarmed
  about climate change, while Kuwait is the least concerned among the 12
  surveyed MENA countries, with only 12 percent of its citizens regarding it as
  a very serious problem. Notably, Libya and Iraq are seen as the most
  apprehensive about the environment, with the overwhelming majority being very
  concerned about water pollution and trash, while many in both countries are
  also concerned about air pollution. Nevertheless, both countries exhibit some
  of the lowest rates of concern about climate change with Iraq being the
  second least worried about it after Kuwait. Perhaps the discrepancy in level
  of concerns, in countries like Libya, Iraq and Kuwait is partially because
  they are major oil producing countries. As such citizens may fear curtailing
  the use of fossil fuels globally could gravely impact their economy. 2- Views by
  demographics: across the region, worries about the environment– climate
  change, air quality, water pollution, and trash – are greater for individuals
  with higher levels of education, as compared to individuals with lower levels
  of education. And attitudes toward the environment vary across the
  urban/rural divide in MENA. Climate change is viewed as more problematic by
  citizens living in rural areas compared to those living in urban areas
  especially in Palestine, Yemen, Sudan, Jordan and Algeria. Trash, on the
  other hand, is perceived as more problematic in urban areas in Tunisia, Yemen
  and Morocco, while it is considered a more serious issue in rural areas in
  Sudan. Surprisingly, climate change is not a major environmental concern for
  young Arabs in comparison with their peers worldwide. However, young
  Egyptians, Moroccans and Sudanese stand out as more worried than their older
  counterparts on this issue. Finally, Arab Barometer’s data shows little to no
  variation in environmental views by gender. 3- Despite
  awareness of the risk of certain environmental issues in MENA, environmental
  protection does not rise as public priority. Only seven percent or fewer
  citizens in six MENA countries surveyed in October 2020 say that reducing
  environmental pollution should be the top priority of government spending in
  the coming year. And only nine percent or fewer in seven MENA countries
  surveyed in Spring 2021 prefer foreign aid to target the environment. (Arabbarometer) March 24, 2022 735-43-21/Polls Are Europeans In Favor Of Ukraine Joining The EU, A Study In 4
  Countries
  The Spaniards are the most in favor of Ukraine's membership: 6 people
  out of 10 (60%) want the country to join the Union. Only 14% are against
  it. At the same time, a relative majority of Germans (46%), Italians
  (45%) and French (42%) share
  this opinion. Conversely, 30% of the citizens of each of these countries
  are opposed to Ukraine's membership. Opinion swung in favor of membership in
  France and Germany Opinion has changed
  significantly in France and Germany
  since 2018. At the time, only 22% of French people and 30% of Germans thought
  that Ukraine should be allowed to join the EU. Conversely, 49% of French
  people and 47% of Germans were against it. While it is possible that attitudes changed during the intervening
  period before the start of the conflict, there is every reason to believe
  that the Russian invasion had a strong influence on Europeans. Although the net score of most countries has improved since 2018, the
  evolution of Ukraine is particularly marked. In France, the net score
  increases from -27 to +12, an increase of 39 points , eclipsing the second largest increase
  (Albania, +21 points). Similarly, in Germany, the 33 point increase in net support for
  Ukraine's membership is well ahead of Turkey, which recorded a 21 point
  increase. The same study also reveals that net support for Russia's membership
  has dropped significantly since 2018, dropping from -40 to -69 in France, and
  from -35 to -60 in Germany. (YouGov France) March 24, 2022 Source: https://fr.yougov.com/news/2022/03/24/les-europeens-favorables-adhesion-de-lukraine/ 735-43-22/Polls An Average Of 30% People Believe Most People Can Be Trusted In 30
  Countries
  As citizens around the world were weathering the pandemic, the
  accompanying economic and mental health struggles have been postulated to
  have led to an inward-looking perspective. Ipsos’ tracking of sense of Social
  Cohesion (part of Ipsos Context Advantage Knowledge Suite) across 28
  countries has shown that societies have been becoming less cohesive over the
  past couple of years. Specifically in Canada, trends in social cohesion have been worrisome.
  As an example of this decline, the proportion of Canadians who would trust in
  other Canadians to do what is in the best interest of the country has dropped
  from 72% in late 2020 to 61% today. Similarly, the belief that “I have the
  same outlook on life/priority issues as other Canadians” has dropped from 73%
  to 67%, while trust in government to do what is right has dropped from 58% to
  43%, now standing at only one in four. These trends all point to the
  questions in citizens' minds on their level of interdependence and reliance
  on each other and their institutions. Further evidence of an erosion in Social Cohesion is found in
  findings from our recent 30 country study which probed interpersonal trust, a
  key measure of social capital. A new Ipsos survey
  finds that, on average across 30 countries, only 30% of
  adults say most people can be trusted against 70% who believe that you can’t
  be too careful dealing with people. Among these countries, interpersonal
  trust is highest in China and India, where 56% say most people can be
  trusted, and lowest in Brazil, Malaysia, and Turkey, where fewer than 15% say
  so. The survey was conducted among 22,534 adults under the age of 75
  conducted between February 18 and March 4 on Ipsos’s Global Advisor online
  survey platform. In Canada, only 33% of citizens believe that most people can be
  trusted, against 67% who believe that you can’t be too careful dealing with
  people, placing Canadians in the middle of the spectrum when compared to 29
  other countries. Interpersonal trust is uniformly low across Latin America and closer
  to the global average in North America. Levels vary widely across countries
  within other regions: In Europe, from 48% in the Netherlands to only 16% in
  Poland; and in the Asia-Pacific region, from 56% in China and India to 13% in
  Malaysia.   
 The Demographics of Social Trust In Canada, while men and women hold similar views about trusting
  others, significant differences exist between generational views or by other
  characteristics such as income and education. Older Canadians, higher-income
  Canadians and higher education Canadians are more trusting, in comparison to
  those in middle age groups, or with a lower income and or education. This is in line with the global trends observed, where the propensity
  to trust others is greater among those who are business decision-makers,
  holders of a higher education degree, married, older, male, and affluent.   
 The differences in opinions of various demographic sub-groups yet
  again underline the contrasting experiences among members of society. While a more cohesive society is associated with a more stable
  economy, low social cohesion can be linked to the potential for disruption
  and often, the fragility of societal structures. Furthermore, given the high
  correlation[1] observed
  not only between interpersonal trust and happiness but also between
  interpersonal trust and consumer confidence, the current low level of trust
  among citizens points to an increased challenge for the government as well as
  businesses serving these populations. Governance is more demanding when confronted with the task of
  governing populations that are significantly fragmented. Companies (and the
  economy more broadly) are challenged in their marketing, sales, etc. when
  consumers are divided into various socio-political camps. Ipsos continues to monitor trends in Social Cohesion and public
  sentiment and issues regular updates.   About the Study These are the findings of a 30-country Ipsos survey conducted
  February 18 – March 4, 2022, among 22,534 adults aged 18-74 in the United
  States, Canada, Malaysia, South Africa, and Turkey, and 16-74 in 26 other
  countries, via Ipsos’s Global Advisor online survey platform. Each country’s sample consists of ca. 2000 individuals in Japan and
  the United States, ca. 1000 individuals in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China
  (mainland), France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Spain, and ca. 500
  individuals in Argentina, Belgium, Chile, Colombia, Hungary, India, Ireland,
  Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, Peru, Poland, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South
  Africa, South Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, and Turkey. The samples in Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, France,
  Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Poland, South
  Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United States can be taken as
  representative of these countries’ general adult population under the age of
  75. The samples in Brazil, Chile, China (mainland), Colombia, India,
  Malaysia, Mexico, Peru, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Africa, and
  Turkey are more urban, more educated, and/or more affluent than the general
  population. The survey results for these markets should be viewed as
  reflecting the views of the more “connected” segment of their population. The data is weighted so that each market’s sample composition best
  reflects the demographic profile of the adult population according to the
  most recent census data. The Global average reflects the average result of all the countries
  and markets where the survey was conducted that year. It has not been
  adjusted to the population size of each country or market and is not intended
  to suggest a total result. (Ipsos Canada) 24 March 2022 735-43-23/Polls Is Mother’s Day A ‘Proper’ Special Occasion, Or Is It Too
  Commercialized, A Survey In 18 Countries
  Mother’s Day is a time for children and adults alike to let their
  mothers know how much they mean to them. But are people prompted to say thank
  you to their matriarchs by the spirit of the day itself, or because they are
  being bombarded by companies telling them to express their affection through
  the medium of buying things? A new YouGov survey in 18 countries and territories shows a mixed
  picture regarding Mother’s Day. We asked more than 19,000 people whether they
  thought Mother’s Day is celebrated more because it is a ‘proper’ special
  occasion, or if it was an occasion that people wouldn’t celebrate if it
  weren’t for pressure from commercial entities like greetings card companies. Polish people are especially likely to say that Mother’s Day is
  celebrated nationally for the right reasons, at 85%. Only 10% see the time of
  tribute to their mothers as too commercialised. Almost two thirds of people in the UAE (66%) likewise see Mother’s
  Day as something that is still celebrated on its own terms, rather than
  because of commercial pressure (21%). Online Chinese respondents come third,
  with similar figures (64% vs 24%). 
 Belief that Mother’s Day is still being celebrated as a ‘proper’
  special occasion is generally lower in the West, and particularly in Western
  Europe. Danes are the most cynical, with 61% saying they think that entities
  like greeting card companies are the driving force behind the celebration
  these days, compared to only 27% who disagree. Swedes, Germans, Italians, Spaniards and British people also tend to
  be more sceptical than not about people’s motivations on Mother’s Day, with
  French people split. In the USA, a small majority (54%) still think that the
  maternal moment is marked for traditional reasons, compared to a third (34%)
  who see it as more of a commercialised celebration. Men and women in each country/territory tend to hold similar views on
  the matter. The biggest differences are in Hong Kong, the UAE and Great
  Britain, where women are somewhat more likely than men to say Mother’s Day is
  being celebrated true to its original intent. (YouGov UK) March 26, 2022  | 
 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||