BUSINESS & POLITICS IN THE WORLD

 

GLOBAL OPINION REPORT NO. 885-890

 

 

Week: 3 February, 2025- 16 March, 2025

 

Presentation: 21 March 2025

 

 

Contents

 

ASIA  

885-890-43-01/Polls: 3

Amid climate change, LED-lit ‘plant factories’ enter spotlight 3

885-890-43-02/Polls: 4

8% of Pakistanis have carried a knife, gun, or other weapon due to a lack of safety: Gallup and Gilani Pakistan. 4

885-890-43-03/Polls: 5

Nearly 1 in 2 Pakistanis (48%) believe that war with India is not likely at all, 15% more urban residents (58%) than rural residents (43%) hold a similar opinion: Gallup & Gilani Pakistan Poll 5

885-890-43-04/Polls: 6

Trump’s freeze on foreign aid could give China an opening on the world stage. 6

885-890-43-05/Polls: 8

Maha Kumbh Mela seen as symbol of preserving cultural and religious traditions: Ipsos IndiaBus Maha Kumbh Mela 2025 Survey. 8

MENA   10

885-890-43-06/Polls. 10

The 2025 Ramadan Handbook – Lebanon Edition. 10

885-890-43-07/Polls. 10

The 2025 Ramadan Handbook – Egypt Edition. 10

885-890-43-08/Polls. 10

The 2025 Ramadan Handbook – Saudi Arabia Edition. 10

885-890-43-09/Polls. 11

Spotlight*KSA: Views on Brand Engagement 11

AFRICA.. 11

885-890-43-10/Polls. 11

Nigerians oppose removal of fuel subsidies, want them reinstated. 11

885-890-43-11/Polls. 14

Sudanese reject domestic violence but see it as a private matter to be handled within the family. 14

WEST EUROPE.. 15

885-890-43-12/Polls. 15

Patients struggling with NHS admin. 15

885-890-43-13/Polls. 17

The Power of Product Testing with Synthetic Data. 17

885-890-43-14/Polls. 19

War in Ukraine: 66% of French people believe that European support for Ukraine must continue. 19

885-890-43-15/Polls. 22

Valentine's Day: Money and love go hand in hand. 22

885-890-43-16/Polls. 24

The Power of Combination: Hybrid Research as the Key to Substantial Insights and Groundbreaking Innovations. 24

885-890-43-17/Polls. 26

Trump, Meta and power – what does this mean for Sweden?. 26

885-890-43-18/Polls. 34

After the Örebro incident 34

NORTH AMERICA.. 38

885-890-43-19/Polls. 38

The Complex Landscape of Public Opinion on Deportation. 38

885-890-43-20/Polls. 41

Obama Best Liked Among Living Presidents; Biden, Least 41

885-890-43-21/Polls. 46

LGBTQ+ Identification in U.S. Rises to 9.3%... 46

885-890-43-22/Polls. 48

A look at Black-owned businesses in the U.S. 48

885-890-43-23/Polls. 52

Americans Continue to View Several Economic Issues as Top National Problems. 52

885-890-43-24/Polls. 60

Beyond the Buzz: How Canadians are Embracing a Sober Tomorrow.. 60

885-890-43-25/Polls. 63

Comprehensive Analysis of Television Consumption in Colombia. 63

AUSTRALIA.. 64

885-890-43-26/Polls. 64

Ipsos New Zealand Valentine's Day - Love Life Satisfaction 2025. 64

885-890-43-27/Polls. 65

The number of smokers in Indonesia has surged since the pandemic, but fewer are coming from younger age groups. 65

885-890-43-28/Polls. 68

In January Australian unemployment increased to 10.1% due to a growing workforce with not all new entrants finding jobs. 69

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES. 71

885-890-43-29/Polls. 71

What Worries the World – February 2025. 71

 


 

INTRODUCTORY NOTE

 

This weekly report consists of twenty-nine surveys. The report includes one multi-country studies from different states across the globe.

 

885-890-43-30/Commentary:

Beyond the Buzz: How Canadians are Embracing a Sober Tomorrow

https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/New%20shortcut.lnk_.png

We are entering an era where many consumers are re-evaluating their relationship with alcohol. According to the Ipsos Essentials, 20% of Canadians stated that they are avoiding alcohol consumption to stay healthy. The Ipsos Alcohol Consumption Tracker (ACT) highlights this behavioural shift, compelling the alcoholic beverage industry to adapt by creating low-to-no-alcoholic beverages to continue to retain portfolio market share.

 

To understand the motivations behind this shift, the Ipsos Behavioral Science team developed the Ipsos ALC Framework to help brands address drivers of reduced alcohol consumption. This framework is based on Self-Determination Theory, which posits that intrinsic motivation arises when a behavior is perceived as worthwhile, controllable, and socially connected.

Consequently, the ALC framework consists of three pillars focusing on intrinsic motivation to reduce alcohol consumption:

1.      Attitudes: Focuses on individuals' health knowledge and attitudes toward alcohol and alcohol substitutes

2.      Locus of Control: Focuses on a person's perceived control over their drinking habits and decisions

3.      Connectedness: Focuses on the robust relationship between social relationships and drinking behaviors

Attitudes

Previously, moderate alcohol consumption was believed to be beneficial (e.g., “red wine is good for the heart”). However, today, there are increasing questions about the impact of alcohol on health. Nearly two in every five legal drinking age individuals in ACT express concern about alcohol's health effects, and half report reducing their intake in 2024. The emphasis on health and wellness in the media has underscored the negative impact of alcohol — even in moderation. Non-alcoholic beverages are gaining popularity, with 34% of ACT respondents also consuming non-alcoholic options. Brands should capitalize on this trend by promoting low-to-no alcohol beverages that align with consumer health goals.

Considerations for your business:

·         Do you know if your consumer base is taking active steps to stay healthy?

·         Are you aware of specific occasions where health is prioritized over alcohol consumption? Are you poised to win there?

·         Have you considered the impact of GLP-1 usage on your business?

Locus of Control

The rise of alcohol substitutes has provided consumers with more choices, allowing them to redefine their drinking habits. The Sober Curious movement marks a departure from older norms: In 2024, 40% ACT drinkers claimed to set intentional limits on their alcohol intake; 15% of 18- to 34-year-olds take extended breaks from alcohol beverages, nearly double from that done by Canadians over 55. When drinking at bars or parties was the norm, abstaining was often seen as breaking the norm. However, the Sober Curious movement and the availability of low-to-no alcohol options at social events have created a new norm where consumers feel empowered to decide whether to drink.

Considerations for your business:

·         Do you understand your current consumers' beverage repertoire and alternative options?

·         Does your portfolio cater to the Sober Curious?

·         Have you developed a strategy to communicate, engage and win with the Sober Curious effectively?

Connectedness

Consumers tend to invest in relationships with like-minded people, often mirroring their behaviors. The motivation to reduce alcohol consumption is linked to social interactions and where these interactions occur. Peer groups typically influence drinking habits; when a group reduces alcohol intake, individuals often follow suit to fit in or gain acceptance. This shift may lead to shared interests in low-to-no alcohol beverages. While alcohol is often viewed as a social lubricant, data suggests younger generations are less likely to frequent bars and clubs compared to older generations. This change may reduce the perceived need for alcohol as an aid to socialization, motivating individuals to choose low-to-no-alcohol options. Nearly 1 in every 5 of 18 to 34 years old drinker in ACT switch between alcohol and non-alcoholic alternatives. As social dynamics evolve, mindful and moderate drinking practices are likely to become more prevalent.

Considerations for your business:

·         Are you clear on the emotional and functional benefits consumers seek from your brand?

·         What information sources do your consumers use to explore new offerings?

·         Are you aware of how the on and off premise social occasions of consumption are evolving?

(Ipsos Canada)

14 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/beyond-buzz-how-canadians-are-embracing-sober-tomorrow

 

SUMMARY OF POLLS

ASIA

(Tokyo)

Amid climate change, LED-lit ‘plant factories’ enter spotlight

Japan's plant factories are rising as climate change impacts farming. Companies like Itoya Ltd. and Leaf Factory Tokyo grow vegetables indoors using artificial lighting for stable production. Despite high costs, demand is growing, making plant factories a potential future for urban agriculture.

(Asahi Shimbun)

22 February, 2025

 

(Pakistan)

8% of Pakistanis have carried a knife, gun, or other weapon due to a lack of safety: Gallup and Gilani Pakistan

A Gallup & Gilani survey found that 8% of Pakistanis have carried a knife, gun, or weapon for security, while 92% have not.

(Gallup Pakistan)

19 February, 2025

 

(Pakistan)

Nearly 1 in 2 Pakistanis (48%) believe that war with India is not likely at all, 15% more urban residents (58%) than rural residents (43%) hold a similar opinion: Gallup & Gilani Pakistan Poll

A Gallup & Gilani Pakistan survey found that 20% of Pakistanis see war with India as somewhat or very likely, with rural residents (21%) more convinced than urban residents (15%). Meanwhile, 48% believe war is not likely at all, with urban respondents (58%) more confident than rural ones.

(Gallup Pakistan)

20 February, 2025

 

(China)

Trump’s freeze on foreign aid could give China an opening on the world stage

Trump’s foreign aid cuts and targeting of USAID have raised concerns about the U.S. ceding global influence to China, which invests heavily in infrastructure and energy projects abroad. While U.S. aid focuses on public health and humanitarian efforts, China's loans fund megaprojects like Peru’s Chancay port. Experts warn that reducing U.S. aid weakens alliances and boosts China’s image as a reliable partner, despite differences in funding approaches. The shift may lead to more militarized diplomacy, with China gaining strategic openings in global development.

(Asahi Shimbun)

20 February, 2025

 

(India)

Maha Kumbh Mela seen as symbol of preserving cultural and religious traditions: Ipsos IndiaBus Maha Kumbh Mela 2025 Survey

The Maha Kumbh Mela 2025 in Prayagraj is a once-in-144-years Hindu pilgrimage, drawing 500+ million visitors. Key reasons for attendance include spirituality (64%) and culture (53%). The event is expected to generate ₹2 trillion ($23B), but faces challenges like overcrowding (69%) and sanitation (49%). Environmental concerns are mixed (40% worried). The festival peaks on key dates like Makar Sankranti and Maha Shivaratri.

(Ipsos India)

20 February, 2025

 

MENA

(Lebanon)

The 2025 Ramadan Handbook – Lebanon Edition

90% of Lebanese prefer in-store shopping during Ramadan over online. Ads, despite being overwhelming, influence 30% of shoppers. The dominant "Content Explorer" persona (26%) actively engages with Ramadan content on social media.

(Ipsos Lebanon)

12 February, 2025

 

(Egypt)

The 2025 Ramadan Handbook – Egypt Edition

75% of Egyptians prefer in-store shopping during Ramadan over online. Ads influence 60% of shoppers despite overload. The "Content Explorer" persona (35%) dominates, actively engaging with Ramadan content on social media.

(Ipsos Egypt)

12 February, 2025

 

(Saudi Arabia)

The 2025 Ramadan Handbook – Saudi Arabia Edition

67% of KSA shoppers prefer in-store shopping during Ramadan. Ads influence 55% despite overload. The "Passionate Shopper" (29%) dominates, enjoying bustling markets and Ramadan deals.

(Ipsos Saudi Arabia)

12 February, 2025

 

(UAE)

Spotlight*KSA: Views on Brand Engagement

Digital platforms drive consumer-brand interactions, led by mobile apps and social media. Younger consumers feel empowered, with 4 in 5 believing they influence brands. 7 in 10 avoid brands lacking social responsibility, and over half expect brands to engage in social issues.

(Ipsos UAE)

4 February, 2025

 

AFRICA

(Nigeria)

Majority of Nigerians oppose fuel subsidy removal, with 58% demanding reinstatement even at the cost of health and education. Public dissatisfaction is at a record high, with 93% believing the country is headed in the wrong direction and 88% rating the economy as bad. Rising cost of living, crime, poverty, and unemployment are top concerns.

(NOI Polls)

21 February, 2025

 

(Sudan)

Sudanese reject domestic violence but see it as a private matter to be handled within the family

Gender-based violence (GBV) in Sudan has more than doubled since the war began in April 2023, with 6.9 million at heightened risk. Common abuses include rape as a war tactic, intimate partner violence, and forced marriage. Despite government efforts, weak infrastructure and conflict hinder accurate reporting and support. While most Sudanese oppose domestic violence, many still view it as a private matter, and survivors face stigma when reporting.                                                                                                                                   (Afrobarometer)                                                                                                                                                13 February, 2025

 

WEST EUROPE

(UK)

Patients struggling with NHS admin

Ipsos polling reveals NHS admin issues impact patient trust and care-seeking behavior. While 52% think NHS communication on appointments and test results is good, only 43% feel supported in ongoing care. 64% of patients faced admin problems in the past year, with many chasing test results or unclear wait times. These issues lead to perceptions of wasted NHS resources (61%) and discourage 45% from seeking care.

(Ipsos UK)

17 February, 2025

 

(Denmark)

The Power of Product Testing with Synthetic Data

Ipsos highlights the potential of synthetic data in market research, especially for product testing. While synthetic data enhances simulations and data augmentation, its accuracy depends on high-quality training data. AI-generated data cannot fully replicate human experiences but can augment insights when strategically used. When accurate, it improves product testing efficiency, cutting costs and enabling detailed analysis.

(Ipsos Denmark)

10 February, 2025

 

(France)

War in Ukraine: 66% of French people believe that European support for Ukraine must continue

A majority of French people are increasingly concerned about the Ukraine conflict, with 74% worried about Trump reducing U.S. support for European security and 77% uneasy about U.S.-Russia peace talks excluding Europe. Despite this, 66% believe the EU should continue supporting Ukraine militarily and financially, even without U.S. backing. However, only 38% see a common European defense as both desirable and realistic. The nation remains divided on sending European troops, with 49% in favor and 51% opposed. Support for Ukraine has grown, with rising approval for humanitarian aid (+7%), weapons (+8%), refugee reception (+6%), and stronger sanctions on Russia (+10%).

(Ipsos France)

22 February, 2025

 

(Spain)

Valentine's Day: Money and love go hand in hand

Spain ranks among the top European countries in love and sexual satisfaction, with 83% feeling loved and 66% satisfied with their sex lives, leading Europe in the latter. Millennials report the highest satisfaction in both aspects (71%). Higher income correlates with greater love and sexual fulfillment, as 89% of high earners feel loved compared to 80% of low earners. The Love Life Satisfaction Index places Spain at 78%, just behind the Netherlands (79%). While Spain excels in love and sex, it lags in relationship satisfaction compared to the Netherlands (92%) and the UK (87%).

(Ipsos Spain)

12 February, 2025

 

(Germany)

The Power of Combination: Hybrid Research as the Key to Substantial Insights and Groundbreaking Innovations

Hybrid research combines qualitative and quantitative methods, enhanced by AI, for deeper consumer insights and innovation. Ipsos’ five-phase approach includes social media analysis, self-ethnography, interviews, AI-human data analysis, and workshops. The future lies in AI-driven personalization, automation, and integrating real and synthetic data, ensuring adaptability and competitive advantage despite requiring more expertise.

(Ipsos Germany)

17 February, 2025

 

(Sweden)

Trump, Meta and power – what does this mean for Sweden?

A Novus and Gallup International survey found that most Swedes view Trump's presidency as destabilizing, with 81% believing the U.S. election affects Sweden’s economy and security. Social media is seen as a key driver of polarization, though traditional media and politicians also share responsibility. Elon Musk’s actions have damaged Tesla’s reputation, while concerns over social media’s role in spreading hate and misinformation remain high. Older Swedes demand more accountability from platforms, and half believe laws should be tightened to curb harmful rhetoric, reflecting frustration over the misuse of free speech and declining media responsibility.

(Novus)                                                                                                                                                            19 February, 2025

(Sweden)

After the Örebro incident

A Novus survey on the Örebro school shooting reveals that 44% of Swedes believe social services could have identified warning signs, while 27% think no one could have. Despite the attack, 78% do not feel more unsafe. However, broader concerns persist, with 35% feeling more insecure overall and 41% advocating for better psychiatric care over increased policing. Swedes prioritize healthcare and education to address root causes of crime rather than just law enforcement. The focus is less on banning weapons and more on societal failures in identifying and supporting those at risk before violence occurs.

(Novus)

24 February, 2025

 

NORTH AMERICA

(USA)

The Complex Landscape of Public Opinion on Deportation

Public opinion on deportation in the U.S. is highly complex and varies based on how the issue is framed. While 70% support a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, 47% also support deportation, with opinions shifting based on specific circumstances. Polls show stronger support for deporting those with criminal records but much lower support for deporting long-term residents, families, or those brought illegally as children. Differences in survey results highlight the impact of question wording and context. Overall, Americans favor a selective approach over mass deportation and recognize the economic and logistical challenges involved. Policymakers must consider these nuances when shaping immigration policies.                   (Gallup USA)                                                                                                                                     14 February, 2025

Obama Best Liked Among Living Presidents; Biden, Least

A recent Gallup poll shows Barack Obama as the most favorably viewed living U.S. president (59%), while Joe Biden has the lowest rating (39%). George W. Bush and Bill Clinton are viewed more positively than negatively, while opinions on Donald Trump are divided. Favorability trends follow a typical pattern: high ratings at inauguration, decline during presidency, low points at exit, and eventual improvement. Obama is an exception, maintaining strong post-presidency ratings. Trump’s favorability, currently split, may decline over time, while Biden’s could improve. Party affiliation significantly influences opinions, with the sharpest divide seen in Trump’s ratings.

(Gallup USA)

11 February, 2025

LGBTQ+ Identification in U.S. Rises to 9.3%

Gallup’s 2024 survey finds 9.3% of U.S. adults identifying as LGBTQ+, nearly double the 2020 figure and up from 3.5% in 2012. Younger generations drive this increase, with over 22% of Gen Z adults identifying as LGBTQ+, compared to just 1.8% of the Silent Generation. Bisexuality is the most common identity, especially among younger LGBTQ+ individuals.

LGBTQ+ identification is higher among women, liberals, urban residents, and younger generations. Women, especially in Gen Z and millennials, are more likely to identify as bisexual. Political and ideological differences are significant, with 21% of liberals identifying as LGBTQ+ versus 3% of conservatives. Rural areas report lower LGBTQ+ identification (7%) compared to urban (11%) and suburban (10%) areas.

(Gallup USA)

20 February, 2025

A look at Black-owned businesses in the U.S.

A 2023 Pew survey found that over 20% of Black U.S. adults see business ownership as key to financial success. Black-owned businesses have grown significantly, rising from 124,004 in 2017 to 194,585 in 2022, with revenue increasing 66% to $211.8 billion. However, they still make up only 3% of all U.S. firms and 1% of total business revenue.Most Black-owned businesses (90%) are in urban areas, with Florida, Georgia, Texas, and California having the highest numbers. The most common sector is health care and social assistance (26%), followed by professional services (14%) and transportation (9%).Black business owners are more often men (54%), middle-aged (50% between 35-54), and well-educated (61% have at least a bachelor’s degree). Key motivations include financial independence, work-life balance, and flexibility. For 71%, their business is their primary income source.

(PEW)                                                                                                                                                                   12 February, 2025                                                                                                                                                            

Americans Continue to View Several Economic Issues as Top National Problems

Americans see inflation (63%), health care costs (67%), and the federal deficit (57%) as top national problems. While both parties agree on issues like money in politics and health care affordability, they differ sharply on immigration, gun violence, climate change, and racism. Republicans prioritize illegal immigration (73%) and inflation (73%), while Democrats focus on money in politics (78%), health care (73%), and gun violence (69%). Concerns over moral values and agreement on basic facts have grown among Democrats but declined among Republicans. Unemployment remains a low concern for both parties.

(PEW)                                                                                                                                                  20 February, 2025

 

(Canada)                                                                                                                                                          

Beyond the Buzz: How Canadians are Embracing a Sober Tomorrow

Consumers are increasingly reducing alcohol intake for health reasons, with 20% of Canadians avoiding it and 50% cutting back in 2024. The Ipsos ALC Framework highlights three key factors driving this shift: Attitudes, as rising health concerns and media coverage fuel demand for non-alcoholic options (34% consumption rate); Locus of Control, with 40% setting drinking limits and younger generations embracing the Sober Curious movement; and Connectedness, where changing social dynamics and declining bar visits reduce alcohol’s role in socializing. Businesses must adapt by catering to evolving consumer preferences and expanding low-to-no alcohol offerings.

(Ipsos Canada)

14 February, 2025

 

(Colombia)

Comprehensive Analysis of Television Consumption in Colombia

In January, Colombian television remained dominated by national channels, which held 61.43% of the total share, up from 57.48% in December, despite international channels comprising 94% of the total offer. Private national channels took 96.38% of the national audience, with Caracol (65.88%) and RCN (28.93%) leading. Public channels had a minor share, with Teleantioquia (27.52%) as the most watched. International channels held 36.16% of the total audience, with Cliente Claro, CITYTV, and ESPN leading in cable, while Win Sports Premium dominated premium channels. Time-slot analysis showed national TV peaking at 73% during prime time, while international channels led during late-night hours. Popular programs like Yo me llamo and La casa de los famosos played a key role in national TV’s strong performance.

(CNC)

7 February, 2025

 

AUSTRAILIA

(New Zealand)

Ipsos New Zealand Valentine's Day - Love Life Satisfaction 2025

Ipsos’ 30-country study shows New Zealanders report high love satisfaction, with 82% feeling loved and 87% of those in relationships satisfied—close to the global average but lower than Thailand and the Netherlands (92%). However, romantic/sex life satisfaction (57%) lags behind countries like Colombia (74%) and Mexico (72%). Income disparities impact satisfaction, with 68% of high earners content in their love lives versus 56% of middle- and 40% of low-income earners. Generational differences are minimal, though Gen Z and Millennials report slightly higher sex life satisfaction than older generations.

(Ipsos New Zealand)

12 February, 2025

 

The number of smokers in Indonesia has surged since the pandemic, but fewer are coming from younger age groups

The Roy Morgan survey (Sept 2024) shows a rise in smoking in Indonesia, with smokers increasing from 43.2M in 2014 to 54.5M today (35% of the population). However, fewer young people (under 35) smoke, dropping from 48% to 32% of total smokers over the decade. In contrast, smoking among those aged 35+ has surged, now making up 68% of smokers, with the biggest rise in the 35-49 (40%) and 50+ (28%) age groups. While fewer young people smoking is a positive shift, the increase among older age groups raises concerns about long-term health and rising healthcare costs.

(Roy Morgan)

4 February, 2025

 

In January Australian unemployment increased to 10.1% due to a growing workforce with not all new entrants finding jobs

In January 2025, Australia's 'real' unemployment rose by 78,000 to 1.62M (10.1%), driven by more people seeking work. The workforce hit a record 16.1M, with employment rising by 219,000 due to a jump in full-time jobs (+306,000) despite part-time declines (-87,000). Under-employment also surged, reaching 1.81M (11.3%), bringing the total unemployed/under-employed to 3.43M (21.4%), the highest since January 2021. Compared to two years ago, the workforce has grown by 1.09M, fueling employment gains. Roy Morgan’s 10.1% unemployment rate contrasts with the ABS’s 4.0% but aligns with their combined unemployment/under-employment figure of 10.0%.

(Roy Morgan)

17 February, 2025

 

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES

What Worries the World – February 2025

Crime and inflation (both 32%) are now the top global concerns, with crime rising in 17 countries, particularly in Latin America (Argentina 49%, Peru 66%) and Europe (France 38%, Germany 36%). Inflation remains stable, though concerns increased in Canada (49%) after new tariffs, while Britain’s worry dropped to 28%. Unemployment concern (27%) has declined, hitting a record low in Spain (28%), while rising in South Korea (40%). Health care (24%) remains a key issue, with Poland (39%) and Belgium (25%) seeing increased concern. Immigration control (17%) has risen slightly, with Germany (44%) experiencing the largest increase. Economic optimism is highest in Singapore (80%), India (77%), Malaysia (69%), while Germany’s confidence remains at a record low (25%).

(Ipsos Global)

20 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en/what-worries-world

 

 

ASIA

885-890-43-01/Polls:

Amid climate change, LED-lit ‘plant factories’ enter spotlight

On a main street in Tokyo’s posh Ginza district, alongside the glittering storefronts of Tiffany, Bulgari and other luxury brands, the flagship store of stationery retailer Itoya Ltd. tends a very unusual “farm.”

A roughly 60-square-meter hydroponic farm was installed on the 11th floor when the Itoya building was rebuilt in 2015.

Up to 200 heads of lettuce are grown pesticide-free, and then made into a fig and blue cheese salad. The salad is served in a cafe in the building for 1,750 yen ($11.30), including tax.

The company harvests about 20 kilograms of lettuce a day while foreign tourists with shopping bags watch curiously through the windows and take pictures.

“It is one of our goals to make the shop a comfortable place for customers to spend time at, not just buy stationery,” a representative said.

Itoya’s farm is one example of “plant factories” that grow vegetables indoors for on-site consumption regardless of the outside weather.

Lighting and temperature in plant factories are carefully controlled.

Plant factories have attracted attention as the prices of vegetables grown outdoors rise due to climate change, with new entrants from different industries throwing their hats in the ring.

Leaf Factory Tokyo Co. grows vegetables inside a four-story building in a residential area of the capital’s Ota Ward near Haneda Airport.

Its parent company is Otsuka Tekko Co., an iron factory that manufactures auto parts.

It started growing vegetables at its head office on a trial basis in 2020 before going on a full-scale basis in 2023.

It currently grows lettuce, basil, spinach and five other varieties of vegetables, harvesting up to 2,000 heads.

Many colors of LED lights are used to grow the vegetables, and changing the light colors, from blue to red for example, will change the bitterness and color of the produce.

After harvesting, the vegetables are shipped to nearby restaurants or sold in the company’s shop on the first floor.

In Ota Ward, there are only two hectares of farmland—about half the size of a baseball stadium.

“I want to create a model case for young people to work in agriculture in metropolitan areas with little farmland,” said President Akihiro Otsuka.

In 2020, Plants Laboratory Inc. provided Seiyu Co., a supermarket chain, with a plant factory system jointly developed with the University of Tokyo.

The Tokyo-based startup has founded vegetable factories at two Seiyu outlets in the capital, and the harvested produce is sold at 133 stores in the Kanto region.

According to Plants Laboratory, it has partnered with Tohoku Electric Power Co., Hokkaido Electric Power Co. and other companies to set up plant factories around the country.

Vegetables are shipped to supermarket stores and hotels in nearby areas.

DEMAND EXPANSION EXPECTED

According to the agriculture ministry, the number of plant factories in Japan has risen from 93 in March 2011 to 432 in February 2024.

Those that use LED lights and other artificial light sources make up the largest group at 195. While 194 facilities harness natural sunlight, 43 use both natural sunlight and artificial sources.

According to an estimate by Yano Research Institute Ltd., a market research company in Tokyo, the market for lettuce plant factories using only artificial lighting peaked at 22.3 billion yen in the business year ending in March 2022. Since then, the market has faced difficulties in growing further as operators withdraw their businesses and the industry is restructured.

There are also challenges to overcome.

While utility bills are soaring, large-scale plant factories are located far from urban areas, leading to increased transportation costs.

However, prices of vegetables grown outdoors have fluctuated rapidly in recent years because of the severe summer heat and unseasonable weather.

Demand for plant factory-grown vegetables has been growing since the supply and quality is easier to control.

The market is expected to be worth 24 billion yen in the business year ending in March 2029, according to the Yano Research Institute.

FUTURE OF AGRICULTURE

Hiroyuki Watanabe, a professor at Tamagawa University specializing in plant environment control studies who is well-versed in plant factories, said they are unsuitable to grow wheat, rice and other grain crops that require large spaces.

However, plant factories can steadily produce some kinds of vegetables even with limited space.

“It is becoming difficult to grow vegetables because of global warming and extreme weather events,” he said.

“Although there are challenges to generating profits, growing vegetables at plant factories can be a form of agriculture in the future.”

(Asahi Shimbun)

22 February, 2025

Source: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15609996

 

885-890-43-02/Polls:

8% of Pakistanis have carried a knife, gun, or other weapon due to a lack of safety: Gallup and Gilani Pakistan

According to a survey conducted by Gallup & Gilani, 8% of Pakistanis have carried a knife, gun or other weapon due to a lack of safety. A nationally representative sample of adult men and women from across the country was asked the question, “Which of the following things have you done for reasons of security? [Carried a knife, gun or other weapon]” In response, 8% said ‘Yes,’ and 92% said ‘No.’


Question: Which of the following things have you done for reasons of security? [Carried a knife, gun or other weapon]

(Gallup Pakistan)

19 February, 2025

Source: https://gallup.com.pk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/19.02.2025.daily-pollEnglish-1.pdf

 

885-890-43-03/Polls:

Nearly 1 in 2 Pakistanis (48%) believe that war with India is not likely at all, 15% more urban residents (58%) than rural residents (43%) hold a similar opinion: Gallup & Gilani Pakistan Poll

According to a survey conducted by Gallup & Gilani Pakistan, 1 in 5 (20%) Pakistanis believe that war with India is at least somewhat likely, with rural residents more convinced (21%) than urban residents (15%). A nationally representative sample of adult men and women from across the country was asked the question, “In your opinion, how likely is a war with India these days??” In response, 5% said ‘Very likely’, 15% said ‘Somewhat likely,’ 48% said ‘Not likely at all,’ 30% did not know and 2% did not respond.


Question: In your opinion, how likely is a war with India these days?


Rural-Urban Divide: 58% of urban residents were convinced that war against India was not likely at all, 15% greater than the number of rural residents who gave the same answer.

(Gallup Pakistan)

20 February, 2025

Source: https://gallup.com.pk/wp/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/20.02.2025.daily-pollEnglish-1.pdf

 

885-890-43-04/Polls:

Trump’s freeze on foreign aid could give China an opening on the world stage

WASHINGTON--President Donald Trump’s restrictions on foreign aid and targeting of a key agency funding programs around the world may be offering an opening to America’s biggest adversary — China.

From the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development to quitting international groups, Trump’s drastic “America First” moves have raised concerns among some lawmakers and experts about whether the U.S. is ceding global influence to its rivals, especially at a time when Washington is fretting over Beijing’s growing clout at the cost to American interests.

Foreign assistance offered the U.S. a source of “soft power” — allowing it to cultivate goodwill, build alliances and counter adversaries in a bid to shore up national security without having to dispatch troops, weapons or other more coercive measures.

In Cambodia, the contrast could not be sharper than China sending $4.4 million to support demining operations, as Trump halted a $6.3 million grant from the State Department’s Office of Weapons Removal and Abatement partly meant to clear “U.S.-origin unexploded ordnances as the remnants of war.”

Administration officials say it’s past time to review how America spends money abroad.

Asked if the U.S. was giving China and Russia an opening for greater global influence, national security adviser Mike Waltz denied that, telling NBC’s “Meet the Press” recently that “all too often, these missions and these programs ... are not in line with strategic U.S. interests like pushing back on China.”

In Panama, the Trump administration got the government to quit the Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing’s flagship overseas development program, prompting condemnation from China.

Experts and lawmakers disagree on the impact of the U.S. taking a step back from foreign aid. Lawsuits are challenging the administration’s freeze on foreign assistance and moves against USAID, with temporary holds on some of those efforts.

“The second Trump administration will deliver the goal for China” of wielding greater global influence, Feng Zhang, a visiting scholar at Yale Law School’s Paul Tsai China Center, said at a recent debate in Washington.

Sen. Andy Kim, a Democrat from New Jersey, was worried for the same reason. “China doesn’t even need to fight for their influence around the world now because of our own effort,” Kim said recently on “Meet the Press.”

Rep. John Moolenaar, a Republican from Michigan who chairs the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, said it could be time for change on foreign assistance.

“I think as we dig into this, we’re going to find out what’s been working and what hasn’t been working,” he said. “And then how do we innovate to a new way of promoting American interests, American values and being clear on what those values are.”

Dennis Wilder, a senior fellow at the Initiative for U.S.-China Dialogue on Global Issues at Georgetown University, said global influence goes beyond foreign aid, with the U.S. commanding the world’s most powerful military and its dollar dominating the financial system.

Let’s not “accept at face value that China is ready or able to step in where the U.S. may be leaving a vacuum,” Wilder said.

The Chinese embassy in Washington said Beijing is “willing to work with all countries and parties, including the U.S., to strengthen exchanges and cooperation in the field of development, so as to promote common development and prosperity among all countries.”

The two countries — the primary players in global development — are spending foreign assistance differently. Most Chinese money is issued as debt and typically spent on energy and infrastructure projects.

Most U.S. funds were disbursed as grants or loans with low or no interest rates in areas like public health and humanitarian aid, said AidData, an international development research lab at William & Mary University’s Global Research Institute.

In Peru, Chinese money helped build the $1.3 billion megaport in Chancay, which opened in November during a visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping. U.S. foreign aid in Peru, by contrast, was used to finance coffee and cacao as alternatives to cocaine production.

Elsewhere, American dollars helped fight HIV/AIDS in Africa, treated malnourished children in South Sudan and provided medical services at an immigrant shelter in Mexico.

Acknowledging that the U.S. should fund tangible foreign projects like ports and factories, Congress in 2018 established an institution to combine government funding with private investments for projects such as the trans-Africa rail project in Angola.

Overall, China spent $1.34 trillion on nearly 18,000 overseas development projects between 2000 and 2021, averaging about $61 billion a year, AidData said.

The U.S. disbursed $1.24 trillion in foreign aid, including military assistance, between 2001 and 2023, the research lab said.

USAID, created during the Cold War to counter Soviet influence, is the single largest U.S. government player in foreign aid. It paid out $43.8 billion in 2023, AidData said. That is equivalent to less than 1% of total annual government spending.

Because of the differences in the types of projects funded, China is unlikely to step in as the U.S. retreats, but Beijing still wins because foreign aid is about building relationships and goodwill, said Samantha Custer, director of policy analysis at AidData.

“These countries are watching the U.S. and how it engages with its partners and its workers, and they’re making determinations as to whether the U.S. is a reliable economic and security partner, and increasingly there are concerns that we are not,” Custer said.

That will feed into Beijing’s narrative that it’s a responsible partner and global leader while sowing doubt about the U.S., she said.

New York-based China Labor Watch, which monitors labor conditions and investigates practices such as the use of forced labor in China, relies on U.S. funding for about 90% of its budget, and the aid freeze has forced the group to lay off or put on unpaid leave most of its U.S. staff, group founder Li Qiang said.

China now has a strategic opening as the go-to alternative for countries seeking investments without political conditions, said Salvador Santino Regilme, an associate professor of international relations at Leiden University in the Netherlands.

“The broader implication of the U.S. aid freeze is a return to militarized diplomacy, where soft power is sidelined in favor of hard-power coercion,” he said.

(Asahi Shimbun)

20 February, 2025

Source: https://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/15633947

 

885-890-43-05/Polls:

Maha Kumbh Mela seen as symbol of preserving cultural and religious traditions: Ipsos IndiaBus Maha Kumbh Mela 2025 Survey

The Prayag Maha Kumbh Mela 2025, underway in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, a Hindu pilgrimage festival is perceived as a symbol of preserving cultural and religious traditions, by at least 74% of urban Indians polled. This is also significant as while the Kumbh Mela is held every 12 years, Maha Kumbh Mela marks the completion of a 12 Kumbh Mela cycle – a once in 144 years occurrence, celebrated over 45 days.

Interestingly, familiarity about the Maha Kumbh Mela was seen to be high among citizens with 42% being familiar and 32% claiming to be somewhat familiar. Though 26% were unfamiliar about the religious mega event.

 “Government has gone all out to build awareness around the Maha Kumbh Mela, given its once in 144 years occurrence and the religious significance of purifying one’s soul through the holy dip at the confluence of the holy rivers of the Ganges, Yamuna and Saraswati – the Triveni ghat, for attaining moksha/ liberation, through the Amrit Snan and Shahi Snan. And to encourage devotees to visit Prayagraj, govt has made elaborate arrangements through setting up of a temporary city over 4000 hectares, accommodating the pilgrims, with 1,50,000 tents for lodging and 1,50,000 toilets. Supplemented with mobile health units, emergency medical services, underwater drones, mobile app and other accoutrements. Prayagraj in Uttar Pradesh is hosting the Maha Kumbh Mela 2025, the world’s largest peaceful religious gathering,” said Parijat Chakraborty, Group Service Line Leader, Public Affairs, Corporate Reputation, CSR and ESG, Ipsos India.  

Though Maha Kumbh Mela has already surpassed 500 million visitors, the survey shows that the citizens were in different frames of mind: 13% claimed to have already visited the Maha Kumbh Mela, 26% were seen to be in the planning mode, 22% were unsure, 23% were uninterested and 16% were undecided. Despite all the uncertainties, the event has witnessed a large turnout.

Visitors enamoured with Maha Kumbh Mela, for different reasons 

The heightened interest among revellers to visit the Maha Kumbh Mela 2025, has been for several reasons. The key motivations emerging in the survey included: for religious/ spiritual experience (64%), for cultural experience (53%), to meet the holy men – the sadhus and gurus (50%), to witness the large-scale social gathering (41%)34% are visiting out of curiosity or for tourism and 18% claimed to be visiting the holy event to experience the grand scale of the extravaganza.   

Economic impact of Maha Kumbh Mela 2025

At least 56% of urban Indians expect a positive economic impact of the Maha Kumbh Mela on the local community. 

“Events of such magnitude, and since it is a rare holy occurrence, has drawn visitors in droves, from across the country and from overseas, benefiting the local economy. While govt had budgeted a cost of INR 63.82 billion (USD 740 mn), it is estimated to generate a revenue of 2 trillion (USD 23 bn) and boosting the local economy,” added Chakraborty. 

Large scale events come with their own challenges despite impeccable planning 

Citizens expect a few challenges emerging due to the huge influx of citizens in Prayagraj at the Maha Kumbh Mela – the challenges like overcrowding (69%), sanitation and hygiene (49%), safety and security concerns (49%), transportation and traffic control (46%), environment impact (37%), medical and emergency services (29%) and cultural and religious sensitivities (16%).

At the same time, at least 4 in 10 citizens polled, expressed their concern about the Maha Kumbh Mela and huge crowds, impacting the environment negatively. Though the views were largely divided, with 3 in 10 being neutral, 17% expecting no detrimental impact, while 11% were undecided. 

“Some of these auspicious dates have seen a steady rise in the number of visitors. Especially during Makar Sankranti (14 January), Mauni Amavasya (29 January), Vasant Panchami (3 February), Magha Purnima (12 February) and now Maha Shivaratri (last day of the Maha Kumbh Mela), and it marks the culmination of the 45-day religious festival,” stated Chakraborty.

(Ipsos India)

20 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-in/indiabus/maha-kumbh-mela-seen-symbol-preserving-cultural-and-religious-traditions-ipsos-indiabus-maha-kumbh

 

MENA

885-890-43-06/Polls

The 2025 Ramadan Handbook – Lebanon Edition

The report reveals that 9 in 10 Lebanese choose in-store shopping during Ramadan over online shopping. Despite the perception of ad overload, advertisements contribute to brand memorability and influence the purchasing decisions of 3 in 10 shoppers. When it comes to Ramadan personas, the “Content Explorer” (26%) makes up the largest persona in Lebanon. People who fit this persona are digital enthusiasts who engage deeply with Ramadan-related programs and content on social media.

(Ipsos Lebanon)

12 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-lb/2025-ramadan-handbook-lebanon-edition

885-890-43-07/Polls

The 2025 Ramadan Handbook – Egypt Edition

The report reveals that 75% choose in-store shopping during Ramadan over online shopping. Despite the perception of ad overload, advertisements contribute to brand memorability and influence the purchasing decisions of 3 in 5 shoppers. When it comes to Ramadan personas, The “Content Explorer” (35%) makes up the largest persona in Egypt. People who fit this persona are digital enthusiasts who engages deeply with Ramadan-related programs and content on social media.

(Ipsos Egypt)

12 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-eg/2025-ramadan-handbook-egypt-edition

885-890-43-08/Polls

The 2025 Ramadan Handbook – Saudi Arabia Edition

The report reveals that 67% choose in-store shopping during Ramadan over online shopping. Despite the perception of ad overload, advertisements contribute to brand memorability and influence the purchasing decisions of 55% of shoppers. When it comes to Ramadan personas, The “Passionate Shopper” (29%) makes up the largest persona in KSA. People who fit this persona are shopping lovers who indulge in the busy markets and attractive deals during Ramadan.

(Ipsos Saudi Arabia)

12 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-sa/2025-ramadan-handbook-saudi-arabia-edition

 

885-890-43-09/Polls

Spotlight*KSA: Views on Brand Engagement

 

The Spotlight report shows that digital platforms are at the heart of consumer-brand interactions, where mobile apps and social media are at the forefront, providing effortless ways to connect. This trend is especially driven by the younger generation. With the abundance of digital touchpoints, consumers now feel more in control, with 4 in 5 convinced they can influence brands. This sense of empowerment is shifting consumer expectations, as people today demand more from brands. Over half think brands should be involved in social issues, not just business, and 7 in 10 would avoid brands that aren’t socially responsible, even if they like them. These expectations are especially strong among younger consumers, who are calling for more accountability and ethical practices.

(Ipsos UAE)

4 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ae/spotlightksa-views-brand-engagement

 

AFRICA

885-890-43-10/Polls

Nigerians oppose removal of fuel subsidies, want them reinstated

A large majority of Nigerians disapprove of the government’s decision to remove fuel subsidies, with more than half calling for their reinstatement even at the expense of other key sectors such as health and education, the latest Afrobarometer survey shows. 

Almost two years after the elimination of the subsidies, public dissatisfaction with the country’s economic direction has reached record levels. More than nine in 10 Nigerians say the country is heading in the wrong direction. 

Nearly as many citizens say the economy is in bad shape, while three-fourths report poor personal living conditions. 

The most important problem that Nigerians want the government to address is the increasing cost of living, followed by crime and security, poverty, unemployment, management of the economy, and electricity. 

Key findings

▪ A large majority of respondents “disapprove” (33%) or “strongly disapprove” (52%) of the government’s decision to remove fuel subsidies. Only 12% approve of their removal (Figure 1).

▪ Almost six in 10 (58%) say the government should reinstate fuel subsidies even if this means reducing other important expenditures such as health or education (Figure 2). 

▪ More than nine in 10 Nigerians (93%) say the country is going in “the wrong direction.” This represents increases of 30 percentage points since 2017 (63%) and 4 points since the most recent survey in 2022 (89%) (Figure 3). 

▪ Nearly nine in 10 citizens (88%) say the country’s economic condition is “fairly bad” or “very bad,” up 30 percentage points from 2020 (Figure 4). o  And three-fourths (74%) report poor personal living conditions.

The increasing cost of living (33%) is the most frequently cited problem that Nigerians want the government to address, followed by crime and security (31%), poverty (27%), unemployment (27%), management of the economy (25%), and electricity (25%) (Figure 5). 

 Figure 1: Views on government's decision to remove fuel subsidies | Nigeria | 2024 

Chart showing views on government decision

Perceptions on fuel subsidy removal

Respondents were asked: Do you approve or disapprove of the government’s decision to remove fuel subsidies, or haven’t you heard enough to say? 


Figure 2: Should fuel subsidies be reinstated?
| Nigeria | 2024

Chart showing citizens support for fuel subsidy removal

Support for reinstating subsidy removal

Respondents were asked: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: The Nigerian government should reinstate fuel subsidies even if this means reducing other important expenditures such as health or education?

 

Figure 3: Overall direction of the country | Nigeria | 2012-2024 

Graph showing the overall direction of Nigeria

Perception on the overall direction of Nigeria

Respondents were asked: Would you say that the country is going in the wrong direction or going in the right direction?



Figure 4: Negative assessments of the country’s economic condition and personal living conditions | Nigeria | 2012-2024 



Nigerians assessment of the country's economic condition/living condition

Assessment of Nigeria's economic/personal living condition

Respondents were asked: In general, how would you describe: The present economic condition of this country? Your own present living conditions?



Figure 5: Most important problems | Nigeria | 2024 


Important problems citizens want the Government to address

(NOI Polls)

21 February, 2025

Source: https://www.noi-polls.com/post/nigerians-oppose-removal-of-fuel-subsidies-want-them-to-be-reinstated

 

885-890-43-11/Polls

Sudanese reject domestic violence but see it as a private matter to be handled within the family

As of October 2024, 6.9 million Sudanese were considered at heightened risk of gender based violence (GBV), more than twice the number (3.1 million) estimated before the war  between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces began in April 2023  (UNFPA, 2024; UN Women, 2024). The most common types of reported GBV cases include  rape as a war tactic, intimate partner violence, forced marriage, and forced prostitution  (UNFPA, 2024). However, obtaining accurate statistics on GBV in Sudan is nearly impossible  because of the country’s poor infrastructure and health-care system and the protracted  conflict, which has restricted communication and displaced millions (Widaatalla, 2024; World  Health Organization, 2023).  

In collaboration with international partners, the Sudanese government has taken steps to  address the scourge of GBV in the country. In March 2020, it signed a Framework of  Cooperation on the Prevention and Response to Sexual Violence in Conflict (United Nations,  2020; Stop Rape Now, 2024). The country’s National Action Plan for the Implementation of UN  Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace & Security 2020-2022 aims to protect  women and girls against all forms of GBV (Sudan Ministry of Labour and Social Development,  2020). Domestic laws directly and indirectly address GBV, such as the Criminal Act of 1991 (Human Rights Watch, 2009). 

In April 2021, after years of pressure from rights activists. the government ratified the  Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (Mohiedeen,  2021). However, while Sudan has signed the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and  Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Women in Africa (also known as the Maputo Protocol), it has yet to ratify it (African Union, 2022) as a step toward ensuring key legal safeguards, access to  justice, GBV-related support services, and international accountability.  

This dispatch reports on a special survey module included in the Afrobarometer Round 9  (2021/2023) survey to explore Africans’ perceptions of gender-based violence. 

In Sudan, GBV ranks as the second-most-important women’s-rights issue that citizens say their government and society must address. Even though a majority say it is “never justified” for a  man to use physical force to discipline his wife, most see domestic violence as a private  matter that should be resolved within the family. And while most Sudanese think the police  take GBV cases seriously, many also consider it likely that a woman reporting an incident of  GBV will be criticised, harassed, or shamed by other members of the community.

(Afrobarometer)

13 February, 2025

Source: https://www.afrobarometer.org/publication/ad947-sudanese-reject-domestic-violence-but-see-it-as-a-private-matter-to-be-handled-within-the-family/

 

WEST EUROPE

885-890-43-12/Polls

Patients struggling with NHS admin

New Ipsos polling for the King’s Fund, National Voices and Healthwatch England has explored people’s experiences of NHS admin, and the impact of that on their views of the NHS. Read more in the King’s Fund, National Voices and Healthwatch England long read, Lost in the System: the need for better admin.

Around half (52%) think the NHS is good at communicating with patients about things like appointments and test results. However, just 43% think the NHS is good at ensuring there is someone for patients to contact about their ongoing care and 28% think it is poor at this, and while 42% think the NHS is good at keeping people informed about what is happening with their care and treatment, 32% think it is poor at this.

Nearly two in three patients (64%) have experienced at least one NHS admin problem in the last year (for themselves or someone they care for). This includes around one-third of those who have used an NHS service in the last year (for themselves or for someone else) having had to chase for their results, and not been kept updated about how long they would have to wait for care or treatment.

Around one-third of NHS service users and their carers say they have had to chase for results, or have not been kept updated about how long they would have to wait for care or treatment

 

Among people who have experienced one of these issues, the most common impact of the experience is making them think that NHS money is being wasted (61%), that their time is being wasted (56%) and that NHS staff time is being wasted (55%). It also impacts on patients’ likelihood to seek care, with 45% saying it made them give up on seeking care or treatment for their condition on that occasion and 42% that it made them less likely to seek care in the future.

The most common impact of experiencing these administrative issues is making people think that NHS money is being wasted

 

Technical information

1,888 English adults aged 18-75 were asked (online) by Ipsos about how good or poor the NHS was at communicating on a range of things like appointments and test results. The research was carried out between 29 November – 1 December 2024. Quotas were set by age within gender, region and working status. Data are weighted by age within gender, region, working status, social grade and education to match the profile of the population.

(Ipsos UK)

17 February, 2025

Source: http://ipsos.com/en-uk/patients-struggling-nhs-admin

 

885-890-43-13/Polls

The Power of Product Testing with Synthetic Data

Synthetic data is revolutionizing industries from healthcare to financial services to automotive, by enabling simulations and data augmentation. At Ipsos, we believe synthetic data opens up brand new possibilities for market research, particularly in the area of product testing. However, many businesses remain uncertain about the quality of synthetic data or how to evaluate it.

In this Ipsos Views paper, our experts provide recommendations for generating and evaluating high-quality synthetic data and explore how synthetic data can be applied specifically to product testing.

Generating and evaluating synthetic data

To generate synthetic data that effectively mimics real-world data, an artificial intelligence (AI) model must first be trained on relevant, real-world data. As discussed in our first paper in the Humanizing AI series, AIs are simply algorithms; they have no intelligence of their own, until they are trained. It is through learning from training data that AIs acquire the intelligence we associate with them.

The evaluation process is also straightforward. Synthetic numerical data should, at minimum, mirror real-world data on common statistical measures. The closer synthetic data is to human data, the less risk we assume when using it, but there is always some risk because synthetic data can never perfectly mimic real-world data in every aspect.

Approaches to generating synthetic data fall into two categories: LLMs (Large Language Models) and non-LLMs, distinguished by their textual and numerical nature, respectively. We explore both approaches in this paper.

The product experience is inherently human

How humans react to products, or life in general, is not captured solely in the brain as factual or semantic knowledge, our bodies and sensory experiences play a significant role, too.  

This paper presents the findings from our two research streams carried out aiming to establish the minimum number of human respondents needed to test products alongside synthetic data to ensure viable results. To discover the key findings from the research, you can also download our useful infographic.

200 Humans vs. 50 Humans + 150 Synths

If an AI has not been trained on real-world data that is relevant to your business, it will not be able to generate synthetic data that shares the same properties as real-world data. It’s as simple as that!

Key takeaways:

1. Synthetic data will never be human.
AI alone can never echo our product experiences, which combine the five senses, emotions, expectations, and context. Therefore, our goal is to augment human input with synthetic data, not replace it.

2. Accuracy hinges on the training data.
The value of synthetic data is not binary (good or bad); the accuracy of synthetic data depends on many factors including the differences in the data we are trying to replicate, and the representativeness of the real-world data we are training an AI to learn from. The use of synthetic data should be strategic, considering the associated risks and benefits.

3. When accurate, it can power product testing.
Synthetic data can boost market research agility, making it ideal for resource-intensive areas like product testing - reducing costs, saving time, with additional benefits for detailed sub-group analyses.

(Ipsos Denmark)

10 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-dk/humanizing-ai-2-the-power-of-product-testing-with-synthetic-data

 

885-890-43-14/Polls

War in Ukraine: 66% of French people believe that European support for Ukraine must continue

French people concerned about the latest developments in the conflict in Ukraine

74% of French people say they are worried by Donald Trump's announcement of his desire to reduce American support for European security. 

 


77% by the fact that peace negotiations are taking place between the United States and Russia without European countries. While this concern is shared by all French people, LFI and RN supporters are a little less worried than the average.

 

Two out of three French people believe that European support for Ukraine should continue

Faced with these announcements of reduced American support, the French believe that European support for Ukraine must continue: 66% believe that the countries of the European Union should continue to support Ukraine from a financial and military point of view, without the support of the United States if the result of the negotiations that Donald Trump is conducting with Russia is unacceptable for Ukraine and European countries – a proportion that varies from 44% among RN supporters to 89% among EELV supporters.


 


However, the establishment of a common European defence remains unlikely to be considered by public opinion. In the event of a US withdrawal from NATO, only 38% believe that the establishment of a common European defence is desirable and realistic and 37% that it is desirable but not realistic. 

 

Thus, the sending of European soldiers to enforce a peace agreement in Ukraine divides the French: while 49% say they are in favour, 51% say they are opposed.

How do the French view the country's level of support for Ukraine?

However, this does not mean a lack of support for Ukraine. Compared to February 2024, more French people think that it is necessary to increase the delivery of humanitarian equipment to Ukraine (39%, +7 pts), the delivery of weapons to the Ukrainian army (29%, +8

pts) and the reception of Ukrainian refugees (25, +6 pts). 

Similarly, the economic sanctions put in place against Russia are more well received, with 38% of French people thinking that they should be increased (+10 points). This desire to increase the various forms of support for Ukraine is particularly strong among EELV, PS, Renaissance and LR-UDI supporters.

(Ipsos France)

22 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/fr-fr/guerre-en-ukraine-66-pourcent-des-francais-estiment-que-le-soutien-europeen-lukraine-doit-continuer

 

885-890-43-15/Polls

Valentine's Day: Money and love go hand in hand

Main findings

·         People with higher incomes are more satisfied with their love and sex lives. 83% of people in Spain feel loved.

·         Spain leads the European ranking in terms of the level of satisfaction with their sexual life: 7 out of 10 people say they are satisfied with their sexual relationships.

·         Millennials are the most satisfied with love and sex.

Valentine’s Day is approaching and, to paraphrase John Paul Young in his historic song, “Love is in the air”. February 14 is the date par excellence to celebrate love and, once again, Ipsos has published its study “Love life Satisfaction 2025”, which analyses how people perceive their love and sexual lives.

In this edition, Ipsos has incorporated the Love Life Satisfaction Index, which measures the level of satisfaction in three aspects: feeling loved, sexual life and relationship. Latin American and Asian countries have the highest data in this index, while European countries are conspicuous by their absence, although Spain and the Netherlands do manage to sneak into the global top 10. Spain, with an index of 78%, is positioned as the second European country most satisfied with its love life, just one point behind the Netherlands (79%).

But let's look separately at the three aspects that this index brings together. The majority of Spaniards say they feel loved, with 83%, again surpassed at European level only by the Netherlands (85%). Spaniards also show themselves to be highly satisfied with their relationship with their partner, with 85%. In this aspect, although the figure is very high, Spain falls in the European ranking. Countries such as the Netherlands (92%) and the United Kingdom (87%) have higher figures than Spain. It is in sexual life where people in Spain lead the European ranking, with 66% saying they feel satisfied with their sexual relations. The Netherlands with 62% is in second place and Ireland with 59% closes the European top 3.

More money, more love

It is scientifically proven that being loved, or loving and being loved in return, increases serotonin in the brain and, therefore, happiness. However, if we add purchasing power to the equation, we see that the relationship between money and love is directly proportional. That is, as the study confirms, the higher the income, the greater the likelihood of feeling loved and sexually satisfied.

Thus, 89% of the population in Spain with high incomes declares that they feel loved, while among people who earn low incomes this percentage drops to 80%.

A similar trend occurs with romantic and sexual life. People with higher incomes have greater satisfaction, as stated by 74% of people with higher purchasing power; while this percentage drops to 60% of Spanish citizens with lower incomes.

Love and sex for generations

In general, all generations say they feel loved in Spain. Baby boomers and millennials feel most loved, with 85%, while generations X and Z, with four points less, remain at 81%.

It is in sexual life where the greatest differences between generations are appreciated, with millennials being the most satisfied with their romantic and sexual life (71%) compared to 64% of X, 63% of baby boomers and 62% of Z.

(Ipsos Spain)

12 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/es-es/actitudes-amor-relaciones-y-sexo

885-890-43-16/Polls

The Power of Combination: Hybrid Research as the Key to Substantial Insights and Groundbreaking Innovations

In today's complex world, where we are flooded with information, it is no longer enough to rely on a single research method. Hybrid approaches that integrate qualitative and quantitative methods are not a luxury, but a necessity. They open up new horizons, especially through the use of artificial intelligence (AI). This development enables companies to gain indispensable consumer insights and thus decisively influence the innovation process.
 

Modern research needs hybrid approaches

The question is no longer whether hybrid approaches should be used, but how they should be optimally designed. The aim is to efficiently manage the increased effort and the need for diverse methodological expertise that hybrid research undoubtedly requires. A full-service institute like Ipsos can do this like no other: hybrid research approaches, delivered seamlessly from a single source, are our USP.

Hybrid research combines the best of both worlds: the depth of qualitative approaches and the breadth of quantitative data. Through the skillful integration of offline and online methods, data collection in real time or at the participants' own pace, AI-supported data analysis and activation, a comprehensive understanding of consumer needs is possible.
 

Why should I rely on a single method that is sure to miss something when hybrid approaches offer a full spectrum of deep insights?


Hair Shampoo 2.0: An Innovative Hybrid Research Approach

A hybrid, multi-stage research project for a shampoo manufacturer that was carried out in three countries shows how this can be achieved.

Phase 1: Netnography – Feeling the Pulse of Social Media

AI-supported social media analysis to identify trends. AI was used to examine social media posts on the topic of hair care. This enabled current trends and opinions to be recorded - the perfect basis for the further research and innovation process.

Phase 2: Mobile Self-Ethnography – Gaining Authentic Insights

Consumers document their daily use of hair care and shampoo. This gave us an authentic insight into people's habits and preferences.

Phase 3: Online Interviews – Conducting Deep Conversations and Understanding Diversity

Subsequently, individual interviews deepened the previous data and revealed consumers' wishes, problems and preferences when using hair care products.

Phase 4: Analysis – intelligently evaluate data for action-oriented insights

Here, human and artificial intelligence work together to analyze all data, identify hidden patterns and generate valuable insights. This helped the customer make decisions based on solid data.

Phase 5: Workshops – creatively implementing results

The results were presented in two workshops and used collaboratively: classic and AI-supported. The AI ​​workshop brought fresh product ideas and claims that were evaluated by human experts and aligned with the brand strategy.  

It offered the customer new opportunities to better understand and interpret consumer needs and to be creative based on that. This resulted in pioneering products that really meet the market. This is a clear competitive advantage and helps the shampoo manufacturer to secure growth for years to come.

Hybrid research approaches show how consumer insights and product innovations go hand in hand. The combination of different methods enables us to master market complexity and optimally support innovation processes. Also because the results have a higher validity. The integration of AI expands the possibilities immensely and underlines the importance of hybrid methods as the key to success.

Hybrid research turns 'what if' into 'what comes next' and enables us to move forward with confidence.

The Future of Hybrid Research: Automation and Personalization

In the future, it will also be important to combine 'real' and 'synthetic' data in a meaningful way. For example, a company could acquire its own persona bot based on market segmentation. This can be used to chat 'personally' with the identified target groups in order to bring them to life with their needs and attitudes.

In the future, the power of the combination of methods will also lie in the long-term activation and greater personalization of insights. With the help of AI, research results can be tailored more closely to the individual needs of companies. For example, marketing strategies and product developments can be aligned more precisely in the future.
 
In a complex world, hybrid research is not just a 'nice to have' – it is the compass that leads us to relevant insights and right decisions.


At a glance

·         Advantages of hybrid approaches: They provide more comprehensive insights and higher validity because they can be flexibly adapted to different research questions and business challenges.

·         Challenges: Hybrid approaches require greater effort in planning, coordination and implementation as well as expert knowledge in different methods.

·         Tools and technologies: Examples such as mobile ethnography apps, online platforms and AI software demonstrate the effective combination of tools for data collection.

·         Future prospects: Expanded integration of data from a variety of sources, including social media, customer feedback, market research and synthetic data, as well as further automation of processes and greater personalization of results will further impact research.

(Ipsos Germany)

17 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/de-de/die-macht-der-kombination-hybride-forschung-als-schlussel-zu-substanziellen-insights-und

 

885-890-43-17/Polls

Trump, Meta and power – what does this mean for Sweden?

The survey consists of a global study conducted by Novus in collaboration with Gallup International on world stability with Donald Trump as president. It has been complemented by a Swedish survey on concerns about polarization and populism, Elon Musk's statements and their impact on his company, and the role and responsibility of social media compared to traditional news media.

The majority of the survey was conducted in Sweden from February 6–11, 2025, while the global questions were asked in 40 countries during September 2024.

Novus CEO Torbjörn Sjöström has analyzed the results.

Stability in the world with Donald Trump as president of the United States

According to a Novus and Gallup Nordic survey, conducted in collaboration with Gallup International ahead of the 2024 US election, the overwhelming majority of the Swedish people, like our Nordic and Baltic neighbors, believe that the world would be more unstable with Trump as president. The fact that this is happening now does not come as a surprise to citizens. Many remember his previous presidency, and the fact that a second term would mean even greater instability was unfortunately expected.

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/novusundersokningtrumpmetaochmakten4.png

81% of Swedes believe that the US election has a major impact on Sweden's economic development, trade and peace. Therefore, what is happening now in Ukraine and Gaza, as well as trade issues such as tariffs, is no surprise to the Swedish people, nor to our Nordic and Baltic neighbors. Many saw this coming even before Trump won the US election.

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/novusundersokningtrumpmetaochmakten5.png

Responsibility for opinion polarization in society

Polarization is the driving force behind the populism that is spreading in the Western world. According to the survey, Swedes primarily believe that social media is responsible, but traditional media and politics also have a great responsibility. The rise of social media, which politicians and news media are also adapting to. The here-and-now reporting and provocative posts on social media mean that politicians get to get to the point and debate, which creates a dynamic where politics is rewarded by the logic of social media.

However, this does not mean that politicians and the media are free from responsibility. They still have their own responsibility, even if the disruptive effect of social media has changed the public discourse.

This survey was conducted during the period February 6–11, 2025, unlike the previous questions that were asked in approximately 40 countries globally during September 2024.

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/novusundersokningtrumpmetaochmakten6.png

The Swedish people are well aware of the effects that social media platforms have on society, and the concern for democracy is palpable, something Novus has reported on for over five years through various surveys. Fake posts on social media have sometimes also been spread further in traditional news media.

At the same time, this reflects how the media and politicians themselves talk about the role of social media, often without reflecting on their own responsibility in the development.

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/novusundersokningtrumpmetaochmakten7.png

Elon Musk's impact on companies linked to him

Elon Musk's provocative gesture was truly provocative and immediately damaged both Tesla's reputation and his own. We have found in other recent surveys that Musk is considered a burden to both Tesla and X.

This reputational loss is due to his arm waving and shows that there is no doubt at all about how the Swedish people perceived the gesture. They saw exactly what it looked like, and how it was interpreted. It was not something positive for Tesla or Musk.

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/novusundersokningtrumpmetaochmakten8v2.png

47% of Swedes are not active on social media, an important aspect to keep in mind when describing these platforms as democratic arenas. With a voter turnout of over 80% in Sweden, it is clear that more people participate in the democratic system than in the debate on social media.

Previous Novus surveys show that many people refrain from expressing themselves on social media for fear of hate and threats. But it is also about wanting to stay updated on the activities of friends and acquaintances, rather than participating in discussions themselves.

The silent majority is a force that is often underestimated. They stand up when needed, they react to what is happening, but they have no interest in standing on a stage and trumpeting it. If this silent majority is marginalized or intimidated into passivity, society loses a central part of the democratic conversation. Silence is often misinterpreted as acceptance, when in fact it is more often about distancing.

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/novusundersokningtrumpmetaochmakten9.png

Social media responsibility

Social media is considered to have a great responsibility, but it is worth noting that the responsibility is greatest among the older generation, which is less digital; the younger generation understands more and places fewer demands on the platforms than the older generation.

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/novusundersokningtrumpmetaochmakten10.png

It is clear that many believe that social media has a great responsibility for what they publish, but compared to editorial news media, the difference is striking, as it should be. One in three Swedes believes that social media has little or no responsibility, since they understand that it is private individuals who write. Compared to what news media produces, only 7% believe that the media has little or no responsibility.

The difference between editorial media and social media is something that citizens understand to a fairly large extent.

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/novusundersokningtrumpmetaochmakten11.png

While there is a difference between social media and editorial media, many believe that social media does not take responsibility. This is probably where knowledge of algorithms comes in, where the platforms can reward falsehoods, hatred and threats. However, the low level of trust in editorial news media's responsibility should be a wake-up call. Only 9% believe that news media fully take the responsibility that can be expected. One in three Swedes believes that the media does not take very much or no responsibility at all in relation to what should be expected.

Given that it is believed that the responsibility that editorial media has for what is published is much greater than what is expected of social media, it is a reminder for editorial media to reflect on what they themselves do, not just criticize social media's shortcomings.

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/novusundersokningtrumpmetaochmakten12.png

One in three Swedes believes that social media should prevent users from writing whatever they want. This is a bit of a philosophical question, we may all have written something we regret, but here it is more about people not wanting to see hate and threats on social media. The Swedish people do not appreciate that kind of tone in the public space.

In connection with the Koran burning, our surveys showed that a large proportion of Swedes wanted to ban demonstrations that could be perceived as provocative or offensive to someone. Which is, after all, the very essence of demonstrations and freedom of expression. At the same time, there is great resignation and frustration over how much space unacceptable behavior is given in the public sphere, and that the state often protects the one who provokes, rather than the one who is provoked. This also has consequences for Sweden's national interests, as in the case of the Koran burning, which threatened to destroy Sweden's chances of becoming a member of NATO.

Behind this, a misinterpretation of freedom of expression is also beginning to emerge that the Swede does not stand behind. A perception that you have the right to say anything without having to bear the consequences. Provoking an entire religion and then demanding protection from the police by invoking freedom of expression is an example of this.

To put this in a more everyday context, imagine someone walking up to the biggest man in the pub and saying something incredibly offensive, then hiding behind the guards when he justifiably gets angry. It is not illegal to say what you want in Sweden, but you have to be prepared for the consequences, even though no one has the right to break the law in response to what someone says. It is extremely un-Swedish to openly provoke someone and then demand protection against your own actions. This is an important aspect to consider when looking at these figures that emerge from the surveys.

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/novusundersokningtrumpmetaochmakten13.png

We asked the following question to further demonstrate what the previous question indicated. We do not want hatred, threats and lies to take up such space in the public sphere. Most Swedes would never even think of expressing themselves in the way that leading figures in power and public figures suddenly do, and we see the damage it causes. Since this is now happening and leading to negative consequences, there is a growing feeling that it may have to be banned. The reason is that constitutional laws, including freedom of expression, are perceived to be abused for personal gain. We do not want rights-grabbing or anti-democratic behavior to be allowed to occur under the protection of our democratic principles.

At the same time, the solution is not prohibition. Rather, this is an expression of resignation, where every second Swede feels that legislation seems to be the only solution. Previously, this type of norm has been maintained by the collective conscience, where news media acted as a yardstick and questioned the behavior of public figures. But today, behaviors that were previously held accountable are rewarded by giving those who act in this way even more space in the media.

It is this development that underlies why every second Swede now thinks that the laws need to be tightened. Because the public conscience that was previously maintained primarily by the news media has disappeared.

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/novusundersokningtrumpmetaochmakten14.png

The majority of the survey was conducted in Sweden from February 6–11, 2025, while the first two global questions were asked in 40 countries during September 2024.

Novus CEO Torbjörn Sjöström has analyzed the results.

(Novus)

19 February, 2025

Source: https://novus.se/egnaundersokningar-arkiv/trump-meta-och-makten/

885-890-43-18/Polls

After the Örebro incident

The Swedish people believe that if someone could have identified a warning that prevented the school shooting in Örebro, almost every second Swede (44%) would say social services. 17% believe that the healthcare system should have seen something and 13% say the police. Almost every third Swede (27%) believes that no one could have seen any warnings. 21% do not know, and 3% believe that the hunting corps should have seen warning signs.

15% of Swedes feel more unsafe after the Örebro attack. 78% do not feel more unsafe. This is a relatively expected level, since this attack was different from the shootings and explosions that have occurred. However, this does not mean that the population feels safe, something we have noted recently. In January, one in five Swedes stated that they wanted access to a firearm to defend themselves, and 35% stated that they felt more unsafe. Only 19% believed that the police would arrive in time to help if someone themselves were the victim of a crime in their home.

It is clear that the Swedish people see a mentally ill person who has committed a terrible act. 41% of Swedes believe that resources for psychiatric care are what is needed to increase security in Sweden. Schools come in second place, with 24% stating that it is important to invest resources, and third, 21% stating that the Police are the most important to invest more in. The fact that it comes in third place in this survey should also be seen from the perspective that politicians have invested resources in the Police for a long time, but psychiatric care and schools have been overlooked.

A reminder that the Swedish people do not see issues as one-dimensional. They now wish to prioritize healthcare and education over law and order, which may seem somewhat surprising if results such as these are excluded from the analysis. The police are crucial during an ongoing violent crime and in preventing crime and protecting the citizen, but are limited in preventing the mechanisms that drive people to commit crime, just as laws do not prevent someone who has decided to commit a crime.

It is also interesting that politicians were quick to immediately agree on banning a hunting weapon, the tool that was used completely in conflict with existing laws. Just because you have a weapon for hunting does not mean you have the right to use it for anything else.

This survey clearly shows that the Swedish people wonder where society was, where the agencies that are expected to catch people who are so clearly mentally ill that they do not hesitate to kill others have been. When that part fails, it is up to the police to stop ongoing or suspected planning of violent acts.

The Swedish people are not fixated on the tool that was used, which politics and the media revolved around. But more: Where did society go that would pick up on this? It is not only about batons and weapons, but at least as much about a functioning welfare society, which actually minimizes the risk of acts and violent crimes occurring, regardless of which tool a perpetrator chooses to use. Otherwise, society has already failed on several levels.

Another aspect that is also identified in the survey is that the Swedish people do not consider the hunting corps to be responsible. It is clear that few Swedes blame these organizations and the approximately 600,000 hunters in Sweden.

Torbjörn Sjöström
CEO
Novus

See below for more information about the survey.

 

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/20250223varningomnagonorebro.jpg

 

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/20250223varningomnagonorebropsymp.jpg

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/20250223satsasresurserpaorebro.jpghttps://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/copy20250223orebromerellermindreotrygg.jpg

https://novus.se/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/20250223satsasresurserpaorebropsymp.jpg

(Novus)

24 February, 2025

Source: https://novus.se/egnaundersokningar-arkiv/efter-orebro-dadet/

 

NORTH AMERICA

885-890-43-19/Polls

The Complex Landscape of Public Opinion on Deportation

Gallup's July update on American attitudes toward the deportation of immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally provides a great example of the complexity of public opinion on the issues of the day. Our polling found that 70% of Americans favored providing such immigrants the chance to become U.S. citizens if they meet certain requirements. At the same time, a substantial proportion of the population (47%) also favored deporting this group of immigrants.A number of polls conducted since then confirm a basic conclusion: Public opinion on a complex issue like deportation defies simple summarization. I’ve been looking at six recent polls asking a general question about deportation, all using probability-based sampling. The polls framed the issue in slightly different ways: “mass deportation of undocumented immigrants,” “deporting all immigrants who are here illegally,” “deporting immigrants who are in the country illegally,” “deporting all immigrants living in the United States illegally,” and so on.

  • Two of these polls produced results similar to Gallup’s findings from last summer, with support for and opposition to deportation about evenly split.
  • Three polls showed a six- to 13-percentage-point margin in favor of deportation.
  • The sixth poll, a clear outlier, found a significantly larger 34-point margin of support, with 66% in favor and 32% opposed.

All of these surveys were conducted in January 2025 and measured opinions among either national adults or national registered voters. Obviously, policymakers (and interested citizens) contemplating these results could be excused for wondering just what they tell us about public opinion on this important and timely topic. An analyst could isolate two of the polls and conclude that Americans’ support for deportation is divided, while another analyst could isolate two different polls and conclude there is strong support for deportation. The range of responses is large enough that it clearly suggests the public has not come to a unified judgment on the issue.

Explanations for Variations in Responses When Asking About the Same Issue

Surveys are designed to provide an estimate of the attitudes of the underlying sampled population (in this case, either all national adults or all registered voters). In general, we would expect routine survey samples conducted at roughly the same time to provide similar estimates of attitudes about a specific topic. That is not what we observe in the case of deportation.

  1. When we are faced with variations in survey results measuring the same issue, one of the first things to look at is question wording. For example, the poll showing the highest level of support for deportation (66%) asked about “deporting immigrants who are in the country illegally.” This question did not use modifiers such as “all,” “mass” or “millions,” which were included in other polls. This wording could have elicited more support because it did not refer to the scope of such an operation for respondents.
  1. The same type of analysis can be applied to other subtle wording differences across the deportation questions. Although we can develop some informed hypotheses about the effect of wording differences, we need experimental research to determine if they are in fact a cause of the differing results. Without such evidence, we can’t know for sure.
  1. Beyond wording, the broader survey context -- the questions respondents are asked before they reach the deportation question -- could have influenced the responses measured across surveys. And there are house and mode effects -- differences in results based on the ways in which differing organizations conduct surveys, and the modes respondents use to answer questions, mainly responding to a live interviewer versus answering questions online. But again, pinpointing such effects requires controlled experiments which, at this point, we don’t have.[1]
  1. There is also the very real possibility that the differences reflect instability in the attitudes of the underlying population. The public may recognize that, while deporting individuals who are here illegally seems straightforward in theory, the reality is far more complex. This means opinions on deportation as a general concept can vary because members of the population, from survey to survey, have differing aspects of the deportation situation in mind when they respond. The wide differences in responses when questions specifically direct the respondent to focus on certain circumstances in which deportation can take place (as we will see shortly) support this idea.

Overall, the ease with which Americans’ opinions can shift across surveys underscores the complexity of the issue and cautions us to put any single question result into context.

Questions That Provide More Detail About Deportation

As I noted above, polls whose questions include details about the circumstances of deportation produce significant differences in support.

  • Support for deportation reaches high majority levels when the question specifies that those being deported have criminal records.
  • Support drops to its lowest levels when the question specifies that deportation would separate individuals from their children and families, or would involve immigrants who came to the country illegally as children or immigrants who have been here a long time with jobs and no criminal record.

Clearly, when Americans think about deportation, they can variously take into account the range of characteristics of such immigrants, variations in their circumstances, and the varying ways in which they could be sent home. The public thus holds a set of differing views about deportation based on circumstances. (This is similar to Americans’ views on another hot-button issue, abortion, which are highly complex and variable, depending on how the specific circumstances involved are described to them.)

Support for Allowing Those in the U.S. Illegally to Remain by Meeting Certain Requirements

Gallup and other organizations have consistently over the years found support for allowing this group of immigrants to remain in the country if they meet certain requirements. This support is evident whether the question is asked independently, as Gallup did last summer, or in a forced-choice scenario, where Americans consistently favor a pathway to legal status over immediate deportation.

My analysis of Gallup data last year showed that a not-insignificant proportion of Americans can hold both of these attitudes simultaneously -- support for deporting such immigrants and support for allowing them to have a way to remain in this country. While Americans want some of these immigrants deported, they just as clearly favor allowing others to remain by following a well-defined process to gain new legal status.

Summarizing Public Opinion on Deportation

As we have seen in this review, Americans have quite variable reactions when asked a general question about deporting immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally. Some surveys show that the public supports the general idea that such people should be sent back, while others show more divided opinions. Americans appear to favor a selective or “surgical” approach to deportation, with clear support for sending back immigrants with criminal records, and much lower support for deporting those with families who would be left behind. These attitudes are coupled with clear majority support for developing a practical pathway for certain immigrants to remain if they meet specific requirements.

The wide range in American attitudes toward deportation reflects an apparent recognition that the situations of the estimated 11 million immigrants who are in the U.S. illegally vary widely and that not all can be or should be treated in the same way.

Additionally, Americans may recognize the practical issues involved in attempting to identify, detain and deport all of these estimated 11 million immigrants. Americans may also be taking into account the economic consequences of reducing available workers in industries where such immigrants provide a crucial part of the labor force. (Previous research shows that the majority of Americans want stronger efforts to stop immigrants from coming into this country illegally to begin with, including hiring more border patrol agents and building a wall along the border.)

In any case, public opinion on deportation is as complicated as the underlying challenges of deportation itself. The public is in essence saying, “Tell me more about the specifics” when asked a general question about deportation. And it is clear that such specifics can shift Americans’ views dramatically in the direction of stronger support and, in other instances, in the direction of stronger opposition.

Public opinion on this issue is particularly important at this time in our nation’s history as the Trump administration ratchets up its efforts to deport immigrants. If the administration, Congress and other policymakers take public opinion into account (as they should), they will have to develop a series of policies that come at the issue in different ways and from multiple angles.

(Gallup USA)

14 February, 2025

Source: https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/656732/complex-landscape-public-opinion-deportation.aspx

885-890-43-20/Polls

Obama Best Liked Among Living Presidents; Biden, Least


WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Of the five living men who have served as U.S. president, Barack Obama receives the highest favorable rating (59%) and Joe Biden the lowest (39%). George W. Bush and Bill Clinton are rated more positively than negatively, while opinions about Donald Trump are divided. Bush and Clinton are somewhat less familiar to Americans than the other three.

 

 

 

The results are from a Jan. 21-27 Gallup survey taken shortly after Trump’s Jan. 20 inauguration to a second term as president. The four other living presidents attended the inaugural ceremony. All five also attended the Jan. 9 funeral of former president Jimmy Carter. Trump’s and Biden’s ratings are essentially unchanged from those from a survey after the 2024 election, indicating neither has gotten an image boost from the news surrounding the presidential transition. Although Trump’s ratings are about equally split between positive and negative ratings, they are among his best since Gallup first measured opinions of him in 1999. He has had only one net-positive rating to date -- 50% favorable and 38% unfavorable -- in 2005, when he was featured in the reality television show “The Apprentice” and before he entered Republican politics. Opinions of Trump were generally poor during his 2015-2016 presidential campaign, with an average of 33% of U.S. adults viewing him positively. After he won the 2016 presidential election, his image improved, with 42% having a positive opinion of him, and this climbed further to 46% shortly after his first inauguration.


Trump’s favorability was mostly above 40% during his first term, but it dropped to 36% right before his departure in January 2021 amid a record spike in COVID-19 infections and the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill riot. His ratings returned to the 40% level in July 2023, after he was indicted in the federal classified documents case.

Opinions of Biden -- now 39% favorable and 57% unfavorable -- are barely better than his worst evaluation since he became a well-known political figure. In June 2024, the favorable/unfavorable split for Biden was 37%/61%, given concerns about his issue positions and his age as polls showed him trailing Trump in a rematch of the 2020 election. Concerns about his age only intensified in the days after a poor performance in the first presidential debate with Trump on June 27. The high point in Biden’s favorability was 61% in January 2017, near the end of his vice presidency. He nearly matched that in January 2021 with a 59% favorable rating immediately after being inaugurated as president.


Opinions of Obama Mostly Steady Since He Left Office

Obama’s image has generally been stable since late 2016, near the end of his presidency. A survey conducted in the days after the 2016 election found that 62% of U.S. adults had a favorable opinion of Obama, within the 58% to 63% range recorded since that time.


The high point in public favorability toward Obama, which Gallup has measured since 2006, was 78% in January 2009, less than two weeks before his inauguration as president. His lowest was 42% in November 2014, after the Republicans won control of the Senate and increased their majority in the House of Representatives in the midterm elections. Obama also had a 42% favorable rating in Gallup’s first measure of him in December 2006, but about half of Americans (47%) were not familiar with him at that time.

Bush Favorability Down Slightly as Fewer Hold Opinions of Him

Gallup last measured opinions of George W. Bush in 2017. At that time, 59% viewed him favorably, 37% unfavorably, and 5% did not have an opinion. Since then, his favorable score has dipped to 52% because more Americans (14%) are not familiar enough with him to offer an opinion. His unfavorable score of 34% is also down slightly.

The 2017 favorability rating has been the highest for Bush after his presidency. His highest favorable rating while president was 87% in November 2001 after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a rating exceeded only by 88% scores for Tiger Woods in 2000 and Colin Powell in 2002.


During a challenging second term as president, Bush’s favorable ratings dropped to as low as 32% in April 2008. Americans continued to hold a net-negative opinion of him in his first two years out of office. In 2013, four years after his presidency ended, Americans’ opinions of Bush were evenly split, and they have mostly been more positive than negative since then.

Clinton Image Improves as Negative Ratings Fall


As is the case for Bush, more Americans do not have an opinion about Clinton now (12%) than when Gallup last asked about him in 2017 (3%). The increase in unfamiliarity with Clinton has been accompanied by a sharp drop in negative opinions of him, to 41% from 52%. Meanwhile, his favorable rating has ticked up to 48% from 45%, resulting in Americans now having a net-positive view of Clinton.

Americans have evaluated Clinton more positively than negatively for much of the time since the 1992 Democratic National Convention, where he was first nominated for president. There have been exceptions, including a 39%/59% favorable/unfavorable division shortly after he left office in a cloud of controversy over pardons and keeping gifts intended for the White House. Later that year, opinions of Clinton were back to an even split, and by 2003, they had returned to being positive on balance. In August 2012, before that year’s Democratic National Convention, 69% of Americans rated Clinton positively, his personal best.

Bush Ratings Least Divided by Party

All five presidents are rated significantly better by supporters of their own party (Republicans for Trump and Bush; Democrats for Biden, Obama and Clinton) than by those of the opposition party.

The 86-percentage-point party gap in favorable ratings for Trump is the largest, with 93% of Republicans versus 7% of Democrats having a positive opinion of him. Ratings of Biden and Obama differ by at least 70 points between Democrats and Republicans, while for Clinton, the gap is 54 points.

Bush’s ratings are the most similar by party, with 15 points separating favorable ratings from Republicans (63%) and Democrats (48%). Those scores represent the lowest rating from a president’s own party and the highest from the opposition.


Democrats are significantly more positive toward Obama (96% favorable) than to either Biden (78%) or Clinton (77%).

 

Bottom Line

Presidential image trends tend to follow a similar pattern -- generally positive ratings around the time of their inauguration, subdued ratings while in office, usually poor ratings when their presidency ends, and improved favorability after having been out of office for some time. Obama’s trend has been an exception, with him having positive ratings near the end of his presidency that have held during his postpresidency years. If the typical historical pattern holds, Trump’s favorability rating could be expected to drop over the next four years, while Biden’s may improve.

(Gallup USA)

11 February, 2025

Source: https://news.gallup.com/poll/656330/obama-best-liked-among-living-presidents-biden-least.aspx

 

 

885-890-43-21/Polls

LGBTQ+ Identification in U.S. Rises to 9.3%


WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Gallup’s latest update on LGBTQ+ identification finds 9.3% of U.S. adults identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or something other than heterosexual in 2024. This represents an increase of more than a percentage point versus the prior estimate, from 2023. Longer term, the figure has nearly doubled since 2020 and is up from 3.5% in 2012, when Gallup first measured it.                                                                                              

 


LGBTQ+ identification is increasing as younger generations of Americans enter adulthood and are much more likely than older generations to say they are something other than heterosexual. More than one in five Gen Z adults -- those born between 1997 and 2006, who were between the ages of 18 and 27 in 2024 -- identify as LGBTQ+. Each older generation of adults, from millennials to the Silent Generation, has successively lower rates of identification, down to 1.8% among the oldest Americans, those born before 1946.

 

LGBTQ+ identification rates among young people have also increased, from an average 18.8% of Gen Z adults in 2020 through 2022 to an average of 22.7% over the past two years.

Gallup has observed smaller growth in the percentage of LGBTQ+ identifiers in some older generations over the same time period. This includes a nearly two-point increase among millennials (from 10.3% to 12.0%) and a one-point increase among Generation X (from 3.8% to 4.8%). There has not been meaningful change among baby boomers or the Silent Generation.

The latest results are based on interviews with more than 14,000 U.S. adults across all 2024 Gallup telephone surveys. Each respondent is asked whether they identify as straight or heterosexual, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or something else. Overall, 85.7% say they are straight, 5.2% are bisexual, 2.0% are gay, 1.4% are lesbian and 1.3% are transgender. Just under 1% mention some other LGBTQ+ identity, such as pansexual, asexual or queer. Five percent of respondents decline to answer the question.


Among the nearly 900 LGBTQ+ individuals Gallup interviewed last year, more than half, 56%, said they were bisexual. Twenty-one percent said they were gay, 15% lesbian, 14% transgender and 6% something else. These figures total more than 100% because the survey allows respondents to report multiple LGBTQ+ identities. The overall estimate of 9.3% of U.S. adults who identify as LGBTQ+ counts each respondent only once, even if they have multiple identities.

One reason for higher LGBTQ+ identification among younger generations of adults is that they are much more likely to consider themselves bisexual than are older people. In fact, more than half of Gen Z (59%) and millennial (52%) LGBTQ+ people are bisexual. That drops to 44% among LGBTQ+ people in Generation X, and is less than 20% among baby boomers (19%) and Silent Generation (11%) LGBTQ+ adults. Older LGBTQ+ people are most likely to identify as gay or lesbian.

LGBTQ+ Identification Higher Among Women, Liberals, Urban Residents

Beyond generation and age, LGBTQ+ identification differs by gender, political orientation and urbanicity.

  • Whether due to political sorting or something else, Democrats (14%) and independents (11%) are far more likely than Republicans (3%) to identify as LGBTQ+.
  • Even stronger differences are seen by ideology, with 21% of liberals, compared with 8% of moderates and 3% of conservatives, saying they are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender.
  • Ten percent of women versus 6% of men say they are LGBTQ+; the difference is mostly because women are more likely than men to say they are bisexual. Between 1% and 2% of U.S. adults identify their gender as nonbinary; of this group, about eight in 10 identify as LGBTQ+.
  • The gender gaps are especially pronounced in the younger generations -- 31% of Gen Z women versus 12% of Gen Z men, and 18% of millennial women versus 9% of millennial men, identify as LGBTQ+, with most of these younger women saying they are bisexual.
  • LGBTQ+ identification is higher among people living in cities (11%) and suburbs (10%) than in rural areas (7%).
  • College graduates (9%) and nongraduates (10%) are about equally likely to identify as LGBTQ+.
  • Differences in LGBTQ+ identification by racial, income, marital status, parental status and religious subgroups reflect age skews among those subgroups. For example, younger adults are less likely than older U.S. adults to be higher income, to be married, to have children, to be religious or to be Non-Hispanic White. Those groups, in turn, have lower rates of LGBTQ+ identification than lower-income, unmarried, nonparent, nonreligious and non-White Americans.

(Gallup USA)

20 February, 2025

Source: https://news.gallup.com/poll/656708/lgbtq-identification-rises.aspx

 

885-890-43-22/Polls

A look at Black-owned businesses in the U.S.

More than one-in-five Black adults in the United States say owning a business is essential to their personal definition of financial success, according to a 2023 Pew Research Center survey. While Black-owned businesses have grown significantly in the U.S. in recent years, they still make up a small share of overall firms and revenue, according to our analysis of federal data.

How we did this

A bar chart showing that about 3% of U.S. businesses were Black-or African American-owned in 2022.

In 2022, there were 194,585 U.S. firms with majority Black or African American ownership. That’s up from 124,004 in 2017, according to the latest estimates from the Annual Business Survey (ABS), conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau and the National Science Foundation. Black-owned firms’ gross revenue soared by 66% during this time span, from an estimated $127.9 billion in 2017 to $211.8 billion in 2022.

Despite this growth, majority Black-owned businesses made up only about 3% of all U.S. firms in 2022 that were classifiable by the race and ethnicity of their owners. And they accounted for just 1% of gross revenue from all classifiable companies that year. By comparison, in 2022, roughly 14% of all Americans were Black.

A note on classifiable companies

As has long been the case, White majority-owned businesses made up the greatest share of classifiable firms (84%) and their revenue (92%) in 2022. About one-in-ten classifiable firms (12%) had Asian American majority owners, and no more than 8% had majority owners from another racial or ethnic group.

How many workers do Black-owned businesses employ?

Black or African American majority-owned firms employed roughly 1.6 million workers in 2022. The firms’ annual payrolls were estimated at $61.2 billion.

About seven-in-ten Black-owned firms (71%) had between one and nine employees in 2022. Much smaller shares had 10 to 49 (13%) or 50 or more (3%) workers that year. Another 13% had paid employees at some time during the year but reported having none at the time the survey was conducted. (The ABS determines employment size by the number of paid workers during the March 12 pay period.)

What’s the most common sector for Black-owned businesses?

By far, health care and social assistance. Nearly 50,000 of the roughly 195,000 U.S. companies with majority Black or African American ownership, or 26% of the total, were part of this sector in 2022.

Looked at a different way, 8% of all classifiable U.S. businesses in the health care and social assistance sector were majority Black-owned that year.

Other common sectors included:

  • Professional, scientific and technical services (comprising about 14% of all Black-owned businesses)
  • Transportation and warehousing (9%)
  • Administrative, support, and waste management and remediation services (8%)
  • Retail trade (7%)
  • A chart showing that health care and social assistance is the most common sector among Black- or
African American-owned businesses.

    Accommodation and food services (7%)

 

Where are Black-owned businesses located?

A map showing that Black- or African American-owned businesses made up greatest share of firms in D.C., Maryland and Georgia in 2022.

Most Black or African American majority-owned businesses (90%) are located in urban areas. Just 5% are in rural areas – that is, places with fewer than 5,000 inhabitants, under the Census Bureau’s definition. The remaining 5% could not be classified by community type.

Some of the most populous states also have the greatest number of Black majority-owned businesses. Florida had 21,064 such businesses in 2022, Georgia had 16,973, Texas had 16,849 and California had 16,826.

Black majority-owned businesses made up the greatest share of all classifiable firms in the District of Columbia (16%), Maryland (10%) and Georgia (10%).

Who are Black business owners?

  • They’re more likely to be men than women. Some 54% of Black-owned firms in 2022 had men as their majority owners, while 39% had women as their majority owners. Another 7% had equal male-female ownership.
  • They tend to be middle-aged. Half of Black or African American business owners who reported their age group were ages 35 t0 54 in 2022. Another 26% were 55 to 64, 16% were 65 and older, and just 7% were younger than 35.
  • A majority have a four-year college degree. Among owners who reported their highest level of education completed, 27% had a bachelor’s degree and 34% had a graduate or professional degree beyond a bachelor’s in 2022.

What motivates Black entrepreneurs?

The ABS also asked Black or African American majority owners about nearly a dozen potential reasons why they own a business.

About nine-in-ten of those who responded said a very or somewhat important reason was the opportunity for greater income; a desire to be their own boss; or wanting to balance work and family life. Seeing business ownership as the best avenue for their ideas, goods and services (88%) and having flexible hours (87%) were also commonly cited reasons.

For most Black or African American majority owners, their business is their primary source of income. Of those who reported primary income information in 2022, 71% said this was the case.                                                                                                                                                                 (PEW)                                                                                                                                                                   12 February, 2025                                                                                                                                                             Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/02/12/a-look-at-black-owned-businesses-in-the-us/

885-890-43-23/Polls

Americans Continue to View Several Economic Issues as Top National Problems

At the start of President Donald Trump’s second term, Americans see a host of economic issues – from inflation to the affordability of health care and the federal budget deficit – as top problems facing the country.

Chart shows Health care costs, inflation and federal deficit are top concerns for public; unemployment remains low

With most adults continuing to say the nation’s economy is in only fair (45%) or poor (31%) shape, large shares of the public – including majorities of Republicans and Democrats – see multiple economic considerations as very big national problems.

Today, 63% say inflation is a very big problem for the country. This is comparable to last May and down from a high of 70% in 2022.

At the same time, the share of adults who say the affordability of health care is a very big national problem has risen 10 percentage points since last year: Today, 67% say this, up from 57% in 2024. There has also been an uptick in the share of Americans who see the federal deficit as a very big problem (53% then, 57% today), driven mostly by rising deficit concern among Democrats.

One exception is unemployment. As has been the case for the last three years, only about a quarter say it is a very big problem for the country.

How Americans rank national problems

Chart shows Economic issues top the public’s list of national concerns – including the role of money in politics

Roughly seven-in-ten Americans say “the role of money in politics” is a very big problem in the country today – the highest share of any of the 24 items asked about on the survey.

 

The affordability of health care (67%), inflation (63%), the federal budget deficit (57%) and the number of Americans living in poverty (53%) are also among the public’s top concerns.

About half or more see the ability of Republicans and Democrats to work together (56%), drug addiction (51%) and the state of moral values (50%) as very big problems in the country today.

Far smaller shares of the public see terrorism, racism or climate change as very big problems for the nation – though Republicans and Democrats disagree about the severity of some of these problems.   

Note: Refer to the topline for a full list of the 24 items asked about. The lowest four items are not shown here.

Republicans less worried about partisan cooperation, political system

Chart shows Decline in the share of Republicans who say partisan cooperation is a very big problem

There have been notable declines in the shares of Republicans who say “the ability of Democrats and Republicans to work together” and that “the way the U.S. political system operates” are very big national problems.

 

The ability of Republicans and Democrats to work together

  • In May 2024, 57% of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents said the ability of Democrats and Republicans to work together was a very big problem for the country. This has dropped to 48% today.
  • Nearly two-thirds of Democrats and Democratic leaners continue to see partisan relations as a very big national problem (63% a year ago vs. 64% today).

The way the U.S. political system operates

  • In 2019, 48% of Republicans said the way the U.S. political system operates was a very big problem; 40% say this today.
  • Democrats’ views are little changed over this period (54% then vs. 56% today).  

Democrats increasingly concerned about agreement on basic facts, state of moral values

Chart shows Democrats increasingly concerned about facts, state of moral values in U.S.

Republicans and Democrats are moving in different directions when it comes to whether Americans’ level of agreement on the basic facts and the state of moral values in the country today are big problems for the nation.

Americans’ level of agreement on basic facts

  • 46% of Democrats said in 2018 that “Americans’ level of agreement on the basic facts about issues and events” was a very big problem for the country. Today, 58% say this.
  • By contrast, there has been a 7-point decline in the share of Republicans who view this as a very big problem over this same period (39% then, 32% now).

The state of moral values

  • About a year ago, 32% of Democrats said “the state of moral values” was a very big problem. This has jumped to 51% today.
  • There has been a 13-point decline in the share of Republicans saying the state of moral values is a very big problem since last year (61% then, 48% now).

Partisans’ views of the nation’s problems

Chart shows Wide partisan differences in views of climate change, illegal immigration and guns as national problems

Republicans and Democrats generally agree on the severity of several issues facing the country – including the role of money in politics and the affordability of health care.

But Republicans and Democrats see other issue areas differently:

Among Republicans

  • Illegal immigration (73%) and inflation (73%) remain the top concerns for Republicans and Republican-leaning independents.

Among Democrats

  • The role of money in politics is the top concern (78%), followed by the affordability of health care (73%), gun violence (69%) and climate change (67%).  

There are particularly wide partisan gaps on the extent to which climate change and illegal immigration are seen as problems.

There are also at least 20-point gaps on each of the following issues: 

  • Americans’ level of agreement on the basic facts about issues and events (32% of Republicans vs. 58% of Democrats say this is a very big problem)
  • The number of Americans living in poverty (40% of Republicans, 65% of Democrats)
  • The impact of natural disasters (33% of Republicans, 54% of Democrats)
  • Inflation (73% of Republicans, 53% of Democrats)
  • Racism (15% of Republicans, 55% of Democrats)

Republicans and Democrats are more closely aligned in their views on the severity of the following issues:

  • The quality of public K-12 schools (45% of Republicans, 45% of Democrats)
  • Domestic terrorism (32% of Republicans, 36% of Democrats)
  • The state of moral values (48% of Republicans, 51% of Democrats)

Large gaps between Democrats, Republicans on immigration, gun violence, climate, racism

Chart shows Larger shares of Democrats see climate change, racism as major national problems than RepublicansOver the past decade, a number of issues have been marked by deep partisan divides, with some of the issues that rank among the top concerns for one party ranking among the lowest for the other.

Illegal immigration

For instance, 73% of Republicans say illegal immigration is a very big problem in the nation, while just 23% of Democrats say the same. The partisan gap on this question has ranged between 40 and 50 points for most of the last decade.

Gun violence

While 69% of Democrats see gun violence as a very big problem, just 26% of Republicans say the same. This 43-point gap is typical of the past decade.

Climate change

There is a 54-point gap in the share of Democrats (67%) and Republicans (13%) who rate climate change as a very big problem facing the nation, also similar to previous years. Democrats are also more likely than Republicans to see “the impact of natural disasters” as a very big problem, though the partisan gap on these views is more modest (54% of Democrats vs. 33% of Republicans).

Racism

Democrats have also consistently been much more likely than Republicans to say racism is a very big problem in the country. Today, 55% of Democrats say this, compared with 15% of Republicans.

Smaller gaps among partisans on schools, drug addiction, infrastructure

Though there are wide partisan differences on many key national problems, Republicans and Democrats are more aligned on some other issues.

Drug addiction

Today, 54% of Republicans say drug addiction is a very big problem and 46% of Democrats view this as a major problem.

Chart shows Partisan gap narrows on quality of K-12 schools and condition of roads

Views about the severity of drug addiction in the country peaked for both Republicans and Democrats in 2019 when roughly seven-in-ten in each group said it was a very big problem.

Quality of public K-12 schools

 

Identical shares of Republicans and Democrats now say the quality of public K-12 schools is a very big problem (45% each).

Republicans’ views are relatively unchanged since last year. Democrats’ concern for the quality of public K-12 schools is up 6 points from last year, closing what had been a small partisan gap in recent years.

Condition of roads, bridges and other infrastructure

Chart shows Uptick in share of Republicans and Democrats who say affordability of health care is a very big problem

Roughly three-in-ten Democrats (33%) and Republicans (29%) say the condition of roads, bridges and other infrastructure is a very big problem in the country today.

Partisans’ views of economic issues

Inflation

Inflation remains among the top concerns for Americans, with 63% describing it as a very big problem. The share saying this is roughly on par with 2024, and down from 70% in 2022.

 

Republicans remain more likely than Democrats to name inflation as a very big problem (73% vs. 53%) – though the gap is narrower than it was a year ago.

Federal budget deficit

Throughout President Joe Biden’s administration, Republicans were consistently about twice as likely as Democrats to describe the federal budget deficit as a very big problem.

Today, this gap has narrowed. The share of Democrats saying the deficit is a very big problem is 12 points higher today (47%) than last May (35%). In contrast, the share of Republicans saying the deficit is a very big problem has dropped 5 points over this period (from 71% to 66%).

Affordability of health care 

Majorities of both Democrats (73%) and Republicans (61%) see the affordability of health care as a very big problem.

Unemployment

Few in either partisan coalition see unemployment as a very big problem today: only 27% of Democrats and 21% of Republicans say it is.                                                                                (PEW)                                                                                                                                                  20 February, 2025                                                                                                                                                            Source: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/02/20/americans-continue-to-view-several-economic-issues-as-top-national-problems/

 

885-890-43-24/Polls

Beyond the Buzz: How Canadians are Embracing a Sober Tomorrow

https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/New%20shortcut.lnk_.png

We are entering an era where many consumers are re-evaluating their relationship with alcohol. According to the Ipsos Essentials, 20% of Canadians stated that they are avoiding alcohol consumption to stay healthy. The Ipsos Alcohol Consumption Tracker (ACT) highlights this behavioural shift, compelling the alcoholic beverage industry to adapt by creating low-to-no-alcoholic beverages to continue to retain portfolio market share.

 

To understand the motivations behind this shift, the Ipsos Behavioral Science team developed the Ipsos ALC Framework to help brands address drivers of reduced alcohol consumption. This framework is based on Self-Determination Theory, which posits that intrinsic motivation arises when a behavior is perceived as worthwhile, controllable, and socially connected.

Consequently, the ALC framework consists of three pillars focusing on intrinsic motivation to reduce alcohol consumption:

4.      Attitudes: Focuses on individuals' health knowledge and attitudes toward alcohol and alcohol substitutes

5.      Locus of Control: Focuses on a person's perceived control over their drinking habits and decisions

6.      Connectedness: Focuses on the robust relationship between social relationships and drinking behaviors

Attitudes

Previously, moderate alcohol consumption was believed to be beneficial (e.g., “red wine is good for the heart”). However, today, there are increasing questions about the impact of alcohol on health. Nearly two in every five legal drinking age individuals in ACT express concern about alcohol's health effects, and half report reducing their intake in 2024. The emphasis on health and wellness in the media has underscored the negative impact of alcohol — even in moderation. Non-alcoholic beverages are gaining popularity, with 34% of ACT respondents also consuming non-alcoholic options. Brands should capitalize on this trend by promoting low-to-no alcohol beverages that align with consumer health goals.

Considerations for your business:

·         Do you know if your consumer base is taking active steps to stay healthy?

·         Are you aware of specific occasions where health is prioritized over alcohol consumption? Are you poised to win there?

·         Have you considered the impact of GLP-1 usage on your business?

Locus of Control

The rise of alcohol substitutes has provided consumers with more choices, allowing them to redefine their drinking habits. The Sober Curious movement marks a departure from older norms: In 2024, 40% ACT drinkers claimed to set intentional limits on their alcohol intake; 15% of 18- to 34-year-olds take extended breaks from alcohol beverages, nearly double from that done by Canadians over 55. When drinking at bars or parties was the norm, abstaining was often seen as breaking the norm. However, the Sober Curious movement and the availability of low-to-no alcohol options at social events have created a new norm where consumers feel empowered to decide whether to drink.

Considerations for your business:

·         Do you understand your current consumers' beverage repertoire and alternative options?

·         Does your portfolio cater to the Sober Curious?

·         Have you developed a strategy to communicate, engage and win with the Sober Curious effectively?

Connectedness

Consumers tend to invest in relationships with like-minded people, often mirroring their behaviors. The motivation to reduce alcohol consumption is linked to social interactions and where these interactions occur. Peer groups typically influence drinking habits; when a group reduces alcohol intake, individuals often follow suit to fit in or gain acceptance. This shift may lead to shared interests in low-to-no alcohol beverages. While alcohol is often viewed as a social lubricant, data suggests younger generations are less likely to frequent bars and clubs compared to older generations. This change may reduce the perceived need for alcohol as an aid to socialization, motivating individuals to choose low-to-no-alcohol options. Nearly 1 in every 5 of 18 to 34 years old drinker in ACT switch between alcohol and non-alcoholic alternatives. As social dynamics evolve, mindful and moderate drinking practices are likely to become more prevalent.

Considerations for your business:

·         Are you clear on the emotional and functional benefits consumers seek from your brand?

·         What information sources do your consumers use to explore new offerings?

·         Are you aware of how the on and off premise social occasions of consumption are evolving?

(Ipsos Canada)

14 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ca/beyond-buzz-how-canadians-are-embracing-sober-tomorrow

 

 

 

 

885-890-43-25/Polls

Comprehensive Analysis of Television Consumption in Colombia

In January, the Colombian television landscape was marked by the predominance of national channels in most time slots, while international television maintains a relevant presence. Using data from CNC Ratings collected in 700 municipalities, with a representative sample of more than 200,000 households, an exhaustive study was conducted on the tuning of television consumption. The study revealed distinctive consumption patterns in different time slots, as well as a clear preference for certain channels.

 

In Colombia, the offer of international channels is wide, having almost 94% of the total offer. Even so, national channels reach 61.43% of the total share; indicating that, despite international competition, local television maintains a solid audience share and significant relevance in the country's television market. This also represents an increase compared to December of last year, when they only reached 57.48% of the total share.

 

National Channels Consumption

 

In the context of national television (Private + Public without international channels), the data show that 96.38% of the total rating is concentrated by private channels, where of this percentage, Canal Caracol takes 65.88%, Canal el RCN 28.93% and Canal 1 1.57%. This share shows the solid position of private channels in the preference of the Colombian public.

 

On the other hand, the remaining 3.62% of the national share corresponds to public channels, where of this percentage, Canal Teleantioquia takes 27.52%, Telepacifico 16.70%, Seńal Colombia 15.07% and Telecaribe 12.97%. Although to a lesser extent, these public channels still have a space in the national television market.

 

International Channel Consumption

Within the total audience of the day, international channels achieve 36.16% of the share. Of this percentage, in cable channels (96.96% of the share), Cliente Claro takes 12.91%, CITYTV 6.37%, ESPN 4.87%, TNT 2.73% and Space 2.60%, as the most popular in January.

 

Premium channels capture 3.04% of the rating among international channels, with Win Sports Premium dominating the segment with 47.73% and followed by HBO Family, HBO and HBO 2 in order as the most prominent in this category. These channels offer select programming that attracts a specific audience willing to pay for exclusive content.



Analysis by Time Slots

The analysis by time slots reveals interesting consumption patterns that reflect the preferences of the Colombian public at different times of the day.

·         In the 'Over' time slot (12:00am - 5:59am), international television accounts for 56.54% of the rating, while national channels reach 43.46%.

·         During the day ('Day', from 6:00am to 11:59am), there is an increase in national television to 61.82%, while international channels maintain a 35.08% share.

·         In the 'Early' time slot (from 12:00pm to 6:59pm), national television remains above with a 60.68% share. International programming has a 39.18%.

·         During prime time ('Prime', from 7:00pm to 10:30pm), national channels (73%) strongly surpass international television (26.93%).

·         In the 'Late' slot (from 10:30pm to 11:59pm), international television regains a slight lead with 50.64% share, national television remains with 49.2%.

 

The analysis of television consumption in Colombia reveals a clear preference for national channels. This is surely due to the broadcast of popular programs such as Yo me llamo and La casa de los famosos, as well as the broadcast of matches, in this case the South American Under-20 Cup. Even so, the diverse panorama reflects the variety of tastes and preferences of the Colombian audience, as well as the importance of offering varied and attractive programming to satisfy the demands of the constantly evolving public.

(CNC)

7 February, 2025

Source: https://www.centronacionaldeconsultoria.com/en/post/comprehensive-analysis-of-television-consumption-in-colombia-4

 

AUSTRALIA

885-890-43-26/Polls

Ipsos New Zealand Valentine's Day - Love Life Satisfaction 2025

New Zealanders report high levels of love satisfaction in Ipsos’ 30-country study

According to Ipsos’ recent Global Love Life Satisfaction poll across 30 countries, New Zealanders report high levels of love satisfaction. The poll brings together how people feel about love, romance and relationships. 

82% of New Zealanders feel loved. Furthermore, 87% of those in committed relationships express satisfaction with their partner, a figure comparable to the global average, but lower than in Thailand and the Netherlands, where satisfaction reaches 92%. New Zealand's romantic/sex life satisfaction (57%) is lower than leading countries like Colombia (74%) and Mexico (72%)

While the majority of New Zealanders feel content with their love lives, income disparities reveal some differences. The study indicates that 68% of high-income earners enjoy satisfaction in their romantic/sex lives, in contrast to 56% of middle-income and just 40% of low-income earners. This trend continues when it comes to feeling loved, with 90% of high earners feeling satisfied, compared to 81% and 63% for middle and low-income earners, respectively. 

There's little difference in satisfaction with feeling loved across generations in New Zealand. Over four in five Baby Boomers feel satisfied with the love in their lives, mirroring the sentiment among Gen Z, Millennials, and Gen X. Gen Z and Millennials’ report slightly higher satisfaction with their sex lives compared to older generations. 

(Ipsos New Zealand)

12 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en-nz/ipsos-new-zealand-valentines-day-love-life-satisfaction-2025

 

885-890-43-27/Polls

The number of smokers in Indonesia has surged since the pandemic, but fewer are coming from younger age groups

The latest Roy Morgan Indonesian survey from September 2024 shows that although the prevalence of cigarette smoking in Indonesia has been steadily increasing, and especially since the pandemic, these new smokers are not coming from younger age groups.

The Roy Morgan survey shows that over the last decade the overall number of smokers has risen from 43.2 million (30% of Indonesians aged 18+) in 2010 to 44.6 million in 2020 (31%). Over the last four years the smoking population has surged by nearly 10 million to almost 54.5 million people today – equivalent to 35% of the population, an increase of 4% points compared to only four years ago.

The current share of smokers in the Indonesian population is clearly higher than the share of Indonesians who were smokers in the pre-pandemic years of 2014-2019.

Number (and share) of Indonesians aged 18+ who smoke by year

https://roymorgan-cms-prod.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/04005400/9776-c1-2.png

Source: Roy Morgan Single Source Indonesia: October 2013 – September 2024.
Base: Indonesians aged 18+, average interviews per year of n=18,427, including n=9,983 for the last 12 months.

Older age groups (35+) now comprise a larger majority of Indonesian smokers than ever before

Over two-thirds of smokers in Indonesia (68%) are now aged 35+ - equivalent to 36.8 million people. This is a stunning increase over the last decade since 2014 when roughly half of smokers (52%, and equivalent to 22.6 million people) were aged 35+.

The largest group of smokers are in the middle age group of Indonesians aged 35-49 years old.

This group contributed to under a third of smokers, 32% (13.9 million people), a decade ago in 2014, but this share has steadily increased, reaching 36% (16.2 million people) of all smokers in 2020, and has now increased to 40% (21.8 million people) - up 8% points from 2014.

The same increase can be seen among the oldest age group of Indonesians aged 50 years and above. They accounted for 20% (8.7 million people) of all smokers a decade ago in 2014, but this had increased to 24% (10.6 million people) of all smokers in 2020 and has now reached 28% (15 million people) of all smokers – up 8% points since 2014.

In contrast, the share of Indonesian smokers aged under 35 have significantly dropped from a decade ago. Now only 22% (12.2 million people) of Indonesian smokers are aged 25-34 years old compared to nearly a third, 31% (13.3 million people), a decade ago – a decline of 9% points since 2014.

The same trend is evident with younger Indonesians aged 18-24 years old who now comprise only 10% (5.5 million people) of Indonesian smokers, down 4% points from 2020 and down 7% points from 2014 when they comprised 17% (7.4 million people) of all Indonesian smokers.

Overall, now under a third of Indonesian smokers, 32% (17.7 million people), are aged under 35 compared to almost half, 48% (20.6 million people), a decade ago.

Share of Indonesians smokers by age: 2014-2024

https://roymorgan-cms-prod.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/04005406/9776-c2.png

Source: Roy Morgan Single Source Indonesia: October 2013 – September 2024.
Base: Indonesians aged 18+, average interviews per year of n=18,427, including n=9,983 for the last 12 months.

Roy Morgan CEO Michele Levine says the composition of Indonesia’s 54 million smokers has changed significantly over the last decade with fewer young people smoking but far more people aged 35+ taking part in the unhealthy habit:

“Smoking is experiencing a rise in popularity in Indonesia. Over the last decade the number of Indonesians smoking has increased from 43.2 million in 2014 to 54.4 million today – a significant increase of more than 11 million people (+26.1% on a decade ago).

“However, there is ‘good news’ hidden within this broader trend. Fewer younger people aged under 35 are smoking now compared to a decade ago. Now 12.2 million people aged 25-34 are smokers, down over 1 million (-8.3%) from a decade ago, and just 5.5 million people aged 18-24 are smokers, down over 1.8 million (-25.2%). As a share of the overall smoking population people aged under 35 have fallen from almost half (48%) to under a third (32%).

“It is good to see that fewer and fewer young people are smoking cigarettes today. This could be seen as a positive lifestyle shift given increased awareness of the health concerns of smoking.

“However, it is interesting, and concerning, to also see that more and more older people are smoking which suggests that once one takes up the habit of smoking it becomes an incredibly difficult ‘habit to kick’.

“These trends are set to lead to significant health problems for millions of Indonesians, and escalating healthcare costs, over the years and decades to come with over a third of Indonesians now smoking compared to under 15% of people in Australia who now smoke.”

(Roy Morgan)

4 February, 2025

Source: https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/9776-cigarette-smoking-in-indonesia-press-release

 

885-890-43-28/Polls

In January Australian unemployment increased to 10.1% due to a growing workforce with not all new entrants finding jobs

In January 2025, Australian ‘real’ unemployment increased 78,000 to 1,620,000 (up 0.4% to 10.1% of the workforce) with more people looking for both part-time and full-time work.

The Australian workforce increased by 297,000 to a record high of 16,115,000 in January with both unemployment, up 78,000 to 1,620,000, and employment, up 219,000 to 14,495,000.

The January Roy Morgan Unemployment estimates were obtained by surveying an Australia-wide cross section of people aged 14+. A person is classified as unemployed if they are looking for work, no matter when. The ‘real’ unemployment rate is presented as a percentage of the workforce (employed & unemployed).

  • Overall employment increased to a record high in January due to a spike in full-time employment:

Australian employment increased 219,000 to 14,495,000. This increase was driven by a jump in full-time employment as the new year started, up 306,000 to a new record high of 9,629,000 while part-time employment fell for a second straight month, down 87,000 to 4,866,000.

  • Unemployment increased in January driven by a surge in people joining the workforce:

In January 1,620,000 Australians were unemployed (10.1% of the workforce, up 0.4%), an increase of 78,000 from December. The increase in unemployment was driven by similar rises in people looking for part-time work, up 36,000 to 837,000, and also people looking for full-time work, up 42,000 to 783,000.

  • Overall unemployment and under-employment jumped 1.1% to 21.4% in January – the highest rate of unemployment and under-employment since January 2021, over four years ago:

In addition to the unemployed, a further 1.81 million Australians (11.3% of the workforce) were under-employed, i.e. working part-time but looking for more work, up 137,000 from December – a new record high level of under-employment. In total 3.43 million Australians (21.4% of the workforce) were either unemployed or under-employed in January – the highest combined figure since June 2020.

  • Comparisons with two years ago, soon after COVID-19 restrictions ended in late 2022, show a rapidly increasing workforce is driving employment growth:

The workforce in January was a record high 16,115,000 (up 297,000 from December, and up a large 1,090,000 from two years ago) – comprised of a record high 14,495,000 employed Australians (up 219,000 from a month ago, and up a large 1,077,000 from two years ago).

ABS Comparison

Roy Morgan’s unemployment figure of 10.1% is clearly more than double the ABS estimate of 4.0% for December and is in line with the combined ABS unemployment and under-employment figure of 10.0%.

The latest monthly figures from the ABS indicate that the people working fewer hours in December 2024 due to illness, injury or sick leave was 530,700. Significantly, this is over 140,000 higher than the pre-pandemic average of the six years to December 2019 (383,850) – a difference of 146,850.

If this higher than pre-pandemic average of workers (146,850) who are working fewer hours due to illness, injury or sick leave is added to the combined ABS unemployment and under-employment figure of 1,523,000 we find a total of 1,669,850 people could be considered unemployed or under-employed, equivalent to 11.0% of the workforce.

Roy Morgan Unemployment & Under-employment (2019-2025)

https://roymorgan-cms-prod.s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/16230840/Picture6.png

(Roy Morgan)

17 February, 2025

Source: https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/9816-australian-unemployment-estimates-january-2025

 

 

MULTICOUNTRY STUDIES

885-890-43-29/Polls

What Worries the World – February 2025

Crime & violence is now the joint number one issue with inflation across 29 countries

Key findings:

·         Across 29 countries worry for crime & violence rose to 32%, equal to inflation concern. This is due to inflation staying the same and crime rising slightly from last month.

·         All LATAM countries on our list put crime as their primary issue. Notably, the proportion of Argentinians expressing worry has risen 10pp to 49%, its highest level since October 2023 (when it was 50%). 

·         Worry about crime & violence is also on the rise in Europe, with France now putting it as their top issue with 38% concerned

·         After President Trump’s inauguration, the proportion of Americans saying their “country is heading in the right direction” is up eight points (41%) to a near four-year high.

·         Germany’s right direction score is at a ten-year low of 17%, while those saying the economy is “good” hit its fifth consecutive all-time low (25%). 

·          South Korea reached their all-time high for those expressing worry about the rise of extremism, up nine points to a quarter (24%). 

·        

Likewise, some parts of Europe are concerned with extremism, with Germany (23%) & Sweden (17%) up four points and Great Britain (15%) up five points.

Crime & violence
Concerns over crime & violence have been steadily rising over the past year and now stand shoulder to shoulder with inflation as the top global worry. In a survey spanning 29 countries, fear of crime has inched upward once again, reaching the same level of concern as inflation. The last time these two issues were equally pressing was in November 2024, when crime also stood at 32%. Notably, 17 nations have reported an increase in anxiety over crime compared to the previous month, underscoring the growing unease across the world.

In February, crime emerged as the dominant concern across all LATAM countries on our list, highlighting a pervasive sense of insecurity throughout the continent. This shared anxiety reflects the region's growing struggles with safety and lawlessness. In particular, Argentina has seen a notable rise in concern, with the proportion of citizens worried about crime jumping by ten percentage points to 49%, the highest level since October 2023, when it stood at 50%. This increase is part of a broader trend across Latin America, where crime has become the central issue for many.

Similarly, Peru’s has reached a five-year high after the share citing it increased 6pp to 66%. March 2020 (71%) was the last time levels were this high.

Likewise, parts of Europe are experiencing heightened worry. It has now become France’s main worry after increasing six points to 38%, while Germany (36%) and Great Britain (29%) are up seven and Italy (31%) by five points.  

Inflation
Inflation as a worry across 29 countries remains at 32% expressing concern. This is the second time since April 2022, it shares the top spot with crime & violence.

Following President Trump’s announcement of tariffs on Canada, concern over rising prices among Canadians has surged, with the proportion expressing worry climbing five percentage points to 49%. However, this uptick is not unprecedented — February 2024 recorded an even higher peak, marking the highest level of concern that year, five points above the current figure.


Great Britain, on the other hand, has seen concern fall by 6pp to 28%. This is the second lowest score in three years, with August 2024 recording 27%.

Unemployment
Across 29 countries the share of people expressing concern over unemployment has fallen slightly to 27%.

Spain’s level of worry this month has dropped to a record low. The proportion of Spaniards specifying jobs fell 10pp to 28%. Not only is this 7pp lower than February 2024, it is the lowest level we have recorded for the country since they were added to the survey back in March 2014.

Meanwhile, South Korea’s score is up 5pp to 40% who are worried about jobs. However, this time last year was only marginally higher.

Health care
Health care as a concern across 29 countries remains at 24% mentioning it.

The proportion of Polish citizens identifying health care as a key national concern has risen by four percentage points to 39%, placing it just behind inflation (40%) as the country’s most pressing issue. This marks a six-point increase compared to February 2024, highlighting growing public anxiety over the state of healthcare.

Likewise, Belgium’s score has risen 4pp to 25% expressing worry. This is 9pp higher than this time last year and is also the highest score for the country since June 2020 (when it was 26%). It is joint third highest along with crime & violence for Belgians.

Immigration control
Immigration control as an issue across 29 countries has risen fractionally this month to 17% mentioning it.

This issue is acutely felt in Germany. The country has experienced the biggest change in concern after climbing 9pp since January to 44% expressing worry. This is also 9pp higher than February 2024’s level. 

This is the joint highest score, with November 2024 and October 2023 recording the same. The next highest was in March 2018, when 49% of Germans said they were worried.


Current economic situation

 

Across 29 countries, 37% of people describe their country’s current economic situation as “good”.

Asia-pacific countries crowd the top of the rankings, led by Singapore (80% good economy score), followed by India (77%) and Malaysia (69%). The Netherlands (58%) is the only non-Asian country where a majority describe the current economic situation as good. 

Up most from this time last year continues to be Argentina (+28pp to 34%). In contrast, Brazil’s good economy score has fallen 14 points since February 2024.

Germany also sees another bad month, down slightly to record its fifth consecutive all-time low good economy score of 25%.

(Ipsos Global)

20 February, 2025

Source: https://www.ipsos.com/en/what-worries-world